1 00:00:08,989 --> 00:00:11,920 - [Narrator] All right well, we will start with Josh Blouin. 2 00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:14,940 He is with the Vermont Cooperative Fish 3 00:00:14,940 --> 00:00:16,420 and Wildlife Research Unit 4 00:00:16,420 --> 00:00:18,510 through the Rubenstein School of Environment 5 00:00:18,510 --> 00:00:21,390 and Natural Resources at the University of Vermont. 6 00:00:21,390 --> 00:00:25,630 And he will be presenting today about 7 00:00:25,630 --> 00:00:28,240 Moose Habitat Selection and Fitness Consequences 8 00:00:28,240 --> 00:00:32,643 during two critical winter tick life stages in Vermont. 9 00:00:35,070 --> 00:00:37,320 - [Joshua] Good afternoon, my name is Joshua Blouin, 10 00:00:37,320 --> 00:00:39,820 I'm a masters student at the University of Vermont, 11 00:00:39,820 --> 00:00:42,330 and today I'll be discussing the second chapter 12 00:00:42,330 --> 00:00:43,870 of my masters thesis, 13 00:00:43,870 --> 00:00:45,680 Moose Habitat Selection and 14 00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:49,140 Fitness Consequences During Two Critical Winter Tick 15 00:00:49,140 --> 00:00:51,363 Life Stages in Vermont. 16 00:00:52,980 --> 00:00:54,320 So due to time constraints 17 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:56,910 I just wanna very quickly give some background. 18 00:00:56,910 --> 00:00:59,920 Moose populations have been declining in Vermont 19 00:00:59,920 --> 00:01:04,370 and a study was initiated in 2017 that ran through 2019 20 00:01:04,370 --> 00:01:06,750 to examine mortality and productivity rates 21 00:01:06,750 --> 00:01:08,040 here in the State. 22 00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:11,660 So 126 moose were fixed with GPS radio callers 23 00:01:11,660 --> 00:01:14,800 in wildlife management units E1 and E2 24 00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:16,500 in Northeastern, Vermont. 25 00:01:16,500 --> 00:01:19,310 This study and Jacob Dubbo from the University 26 00:01:19,310 --> 00:01:24,040 of Vermont Thesis Work found that heavy infestations 27 00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:26,530 of winter ticks is really a driving force 28 00:01:26,530 --> 00:01:28,710 of mortality for our population 29 00:01:28,710 --> 00:01:31,160 especially in the Northeast corner of the State. 30 00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:33,880 And when I say heavy infestations, I'm talking greater 31 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:37,860 than 60,000 winter ticks on a single calf 32 00:01:37,860 --> 00:01:39,290 just under a year old. 33 00:01:39,290 --> 00:01:42,140 So this is a really gruesome hard way 34 00:01:42,140 --> 00:01:45,353 for these individuals to ultimately perish. 35 00:01:48,340 --> 00:01:52,920 So what is the relationship between winter ticks and moose? 36 00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:55,640 So I just wanna quickly go through this life cycle. 37 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:59,160 So we'll start when the tick larvae are climbing 38 00:01:59,160 --> 00:02:04,010 onto vegetation and seeking a host, preferably a moose. 39 00:02:04,010 --> 00:02:06,560 Once on the moose, these winter techs go through 40 00:02:06,560 --> 00:02:09,850 two life stages, nymph and adult on the moose 41 00:02:09,850 --> 00:02:14,590 taking blood meals and molting between each stage. 42 00:02:14,590 --> 00:02:17,120 During the late winter early spring period, 43 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:20,580 these female ticks take their most significant blood meal 44 00:02:20,580 --> 00:02:22,970 in preparation to drop-off the moose. 45 00:02:22,970 --> 00:02:25,300 So after they've engorged with blood, 46 00:02:25,300 --> 00:02:27,340 these female ticks drop from the moose 47 00:02:27,340 --> 00:02:29,670 into preferably leaf litter, 48 00:02:29,670 --> 00:02:33,060 where they then lay their eggs and the cycle continues. 49 00:02:33,060 --> 00:02:35,340 I think it's really important at this stage 50 00:02:35,340 --> 00:02:39,830 to point out these important winter tick life stages. 51 00:02:39,830 --> 00:02:43,160 And again that is the peak questing period 52 00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:44,720 and the peak drop-off periods. 53 00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:47,860 So that fall questing period is that 54 00:02:47,860 --> 00:02:49,780 we defined as a 50 day period 55 00:02:49,780 --> 00:02:52,880 where these winter ticks are really seeking 56 00:02:52,880 --> 00:02:56,560 that host or that moose and the spring drop-off period 57 00:02:56,560 --> 00:02:59,450 when those female winter ticks are taking 58 00:02:59,450 --> 00:03:02,760 their largest blood meal, which typically drives 59 00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:05,703 those calves under a year old to mortality. 60 00:03:08,120 --> 00:03:10,920 So what do we know about moose habitat selection 61 00:03:10,920 --> 00:03:14,770 during these two really critical winter tick life periods? 62 00:03:14,770 --> 00:03:18,210 Well one important study here in new England examined 63 00:03:18,210 --> 00:03:21,550 third-order or within home range habitat selection 64 00:03:21,550 --> 00:03:24,150 during the questing and drop-off periods. 65 00:03:24,150 --> 00:03:26,960 And I'll talk here in just a second about what I mean 66 00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:29,340 by third-order habitat selection, 67 00:03:29,340 --> 00:03:32,910 but the key findings from Christine Healey's paper in 2018 68 00:03:32,910 --> 00:03:36,190 found that, moose were selecting the same habitats 69 00:03:36,190 --> 00:03:39,910 during both the questing and the spring drop-off periods, 70 00:03:39,910 --> 00:03:44,240 which was really promoting this winter tick and moose cycle 71 00:03:44,240 --> 00:03:46,610 as winter ticks tend to be fairly immobile. 72 00:03:46,610 --> 00:03:49,733 So where they drop-off is typically where they're picked up. 73 00:03:51,840 --> 00:03:55,730 So I wanna transition quickly into describing what I mean 74 00:03:55,730 --> 00:03:59,540 by first, second and third-order habitat selection. 75 00:03:59,540 --> 00:04:03,540 So in 1980, Johnson described this hierarchal manner 76 00:04:03,540 --> 00:04:04,780 of habitat selection. 77 00:04:04,780 --> 00:04:07,730 And it's important to note these different scales 78 00:04:07,730 --> 00:04:10,560 as analysis and interpretation of selection 79 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:14,560 may change depending on which scale you're examining. 80 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:17,987 So first-order habitat selection is interested 81 00:04:17,987 --> 00:04:20,400 and is more core scale examination 82 00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:23,160 of where a species tends to be found. 83 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:25,630 What is their geographic range? 84 00:04:25,630 --> 00:04:29,490 While second-order habitat selection is referring to 85 00:04:29,490 --> 00:04:31,260 the selection of a home range 86 00:04:31,260 --> 00:04:32,870 within that geographical range. 87 00:04:32,870 --> 00:04:35,340 So where are animals? 88 00:04:35,340 --> 00:04:37,310 Where do they tend to spend the most time 89 00:04:37,310 --> 00:04:39,410 within their geographical range? 90 00:04:39,410 --> 00:04:42,700 While third-order habitat selection is more interested 91 00:04:42,700 --> 00:04:46,300 in this fine scale examination of habitat components 92 00:04:46,300 --> 00:04:48,810 within an individual's home range. 93 00:04:48,810 --> 00:04:53,100 So this is what Christine Healey was examining for 94 00:04:53,100 --> 00:04:54,460 during these two time periods. 95 00:04:54,460 --> 00:04:56,910 So what were moose using within their home range? 96 00:04:56,910 --> 00:04:59,970 And this is also what I used in the first chapter 97 00:04:59,970 --> 00:05:03,510 of my thesis when I was examining utilization 98 00:05:03,510 --> 00:05:05,343 distributions for individual moose. 99 00:05:09,530 --> 00:05:12,660 And so we have a better understanding of what mortality 100 00:05:12,660 --> 00:05:14,900 and reproductive rates look like from this study, 101 00:05:14,900 --> 00:05:17,200 as well as the suitability of habitats 102 00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:18,790 from my first chapter, 103 00:05:18,790 --> 00:05:20,440 and this third-order selection 104 00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:22,750 during these important winter took life stages 105 00:05:22,750 --> 00:05:25,710 outlined by Healey in 2018. 106 00:05:25,710 --> 00:05:27,760 But an analysis of habitat selection 107 00:05:27,760 --> 00:05:29,400 at these more core scales 108 00:05:29,400 --> 00:05:32,000 first and second-order habitat selection 109 00:05:32,000 --> 00:05:33,930 and how selection decisions 110 00:05:33,930 --> 00:05:37,250 may ultimately affect the fitness of moose 111 00:05:37,250 --> 00:05:39,270 could provide really important insights 112 00:05:39,270 --> 00:05:42,823 for their management as they're in decline. 113 00:05:44,770 --> 00:05:49,040 So the objectives of this chapter were to investigate 114 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:52,150 that first-order habitat selection of adult female moose 115 00:05:52,150 --> 00:05:55,960 during those two important winter tick life stages 116 00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:59,000 using multi-season occupancy framework. 117 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:01,700 And the second objective was to evaluate 118 00:06:01,700 --> 00:06:05,240 fitness consequences of habitat selection 119 00:06:05,240 --> 00:06:08,650 during the fall questing period for cows 120 00:06:08,650 --> 00:06:10,520 who had calves that survived 121 00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:12,750 versus cows who had calves that perished 122 00:06:12,750 --> 00:06:15,733 due to heavy winter tick infestations. 123 00:06:18,690 --> 00:06:21,520 So to get at first-order habitat selection 124 00:06:21,520 --> 00:06:23,500 by adult female moose, 125 00:06:23,500 --> 00:06:27,450 we imposed a grid of roughly 1700 patches 126 00:06:27,450 --> 00:06:29,560 across our study area. 127 00:06:29,560 --> 00:06:32,760 Each one square kilometer in size. 128 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:36,600 We then filtered our GPS radio caller by two periods 129 00:06:36,600 --> 00:06:39,340 so that tick questing and the tick drop-off period 130 00:06:39,340 --> 00:06:42,390 for all female moose captured during the study, 131 00:06:42,390 --> 00:06:47,390 and this resulted in over 12,000 GPS locations of 74 moose. 132 00:07:00,190 --> 00:07:03,710 So the next step was to identify habitat variables 133 00:07:03,710 --> 00:07:06,360 of potential importance to moose occupancy. 134 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:10,790 So we used LiDAR Habitat Structure, 135 00:07:10,790 --> 00:07:13,120 so this really fine scale examination 136 00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:16,040 of the height classifications of vegetation 137 00:07:16,040 --> 00:07:21,040 as well as these NLCD habitat composition variable. 138 00:07:21,050 --> 00:07:24,580 So what is the forest type of these areas? 139 00:07:24,580 --> 00:07:27,000 And so we can map these across our study area. 140 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:30,730 Here's an example of some of our composition 141 00:07:30,730 --> 00:07:33,550 and structure variables as well as terrain 142 00:07:33,550 --> 00:07:37,123 such as elevation and slope mapped across our study area. 143 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:44,200 So as you might imagine, incorporating both this structure 144 00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:47,150 and this composition habitat variables 145 00:07:47,150 --> 00:07:50,060 into a model can be rather complex 146 00:07:50,060 --> 00:07:54,010 and often these relationships are correlated. 147 00:07:54,010 --> 00:07:56,940 And so we created a principal component analysis 148 00:07:56,940 --> 00:08:00,060 or a PCA to account for their complexity 149 00:08:00,060 --> 00:08:02,920 and some often correlated relationships 150 00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:04,480 between habitat structure 151 00:08:04,480 --> 00:08:06,670 and composition variables. 152 00:08:06,670 --> 00:08:09,830 So each principal component is explaining 153 00:08:09,830 --> 00:08:13,330 or was explaining a different combination of the variables 154 00:08:13,330 --> 00:08:15,780 which were ultimately driven by these loadings. 155 00:08:15,780 --> 00:08:18,930 When I say loadings, the figure on the right here 156 00:08:18,930 --> 00:08:20,850 is showing with arrows 157 00:08:20,850 --> 00:08:24,130 how certain habitat variables are ultimately 158 00:08:24,130 --> 00:08:26,769 affecting our principal component. 159 00:08:26,769 --> 00:08:30,240 And I think the big picture here is to focus on 160 00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:31,430 on the right, you know, 161 00:08:31,430 --> 00:08:35,400 we have all of these structure and composition variables 162 00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:37,130 that are pulling these principal components 163 00:08:37,130 --> 00:08:40,740 in different ways, but we ultimately end up with 164 00:08:40,740 --> 00:08:41,780 the map on the left 165 00:08:41,780 --> 00:08:45,240 that is four primary principle components 166 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:48,793 that describes all 11 of those habitat variables. 167 00:08:50,610 --> 00:08:53,050 So now that we have gritted our landscape, 168 00:08:53,050 --> 00:08:55,150 created our patches or our sites 169 00:08:55,150 --> 00:08:57,930 and identified our important habitat variables, 170 00:08:57,930 --> 00:09:00,830 we are now interested in mapping the distribution of moose 171 00:09:00,830 --> 00:09:03,230 across patches on the landscape. 172 00:09:03,230 --> 00:09:04,890 So we create an encounter history 173 00:09:04,890 --> 00:09:08,440 for each of those important winter tick life stages. 174 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:11,370 And you can see here from on the figure on the right 175 00:09:11,370 --> 00:09:14,050 if you can imagine that gridded landscape again 176 00:09:14,050 --> 00:09:17,220 the green patches are identifying patches on the landscape 177 00:09:17,220 --> 00:09:20,240 that were occupied by moose during that time period 178 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:23,670 or the white patches were areas where moose were undetected, 179 00:09:23,670 --> 00:09:26,420 and this encounter histories are showing changes 180 00:09:26,420 --> 00:09:30,693 in occupancy patterns through time and across space. 181 00:09:31,810 --> 00:09:34,700 And so these multi-season occupancy models 182 00:09:34,700 --> 00:09:39,140 really allow us to examine those changes through time. 183 00:09:39,140 --> 00:09:41,200 And there are four key parameters 184 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:43,210 to a multi-season occupancy model, 185 00:09:43,210 --> 00:09:45,330 but for simplicity and time constraints, 186 00:09:45,330 --> 00:09:47,700 we'll really focus on these three. 187 00:09:47,700 --> 00:09:51,890 So the initial probability that moose occupy a patch, 188 00:09:51,890 --> 00:09:54,090 is based on those habitats structure 189 00:09:54,090 --> 00:09:56,020 and composition variables. 190 00:09:56,020 --> 00:09:59,780 So psi is looking at, in that first year 191 00:09:59,780 --> 00:10:02,450 in early 2017 that dropout period, 192 00:10:02,450 --> 00:10:05,130 what is really driving that initial probability 193 00:10:05,130 --> 00:10:07,940 that moose will be there and in a patch. 194 00:10:07,940 --> 00:10:11,250 Next colonization and extinction parameters, 195 00:10:11,250 --> 00:10:14,270 they're really focusing on what is driving changes 196 00:10:14,270 --> 00:10:17,443 in occupancy over time and through space. 197 00:10:18,460 --> 00:10:22,600 And so for example in the drop-off tick period in 2017, 198 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:26,140 the patches within this red rectangle are moose 199 00:10:26,140 --> 00:10:28,670 there was undetected, no moose were detected there 200 00:10:28,670 --> 00:10:30,400 but in the following time period, 201 00:10:30,400 --> 00:10:33,150 that questing period in 2017, 202 00:10:33,150 --> 00:10:35,980 some of these patches were occupied by moose. 203 00:10:35,980 --> 00:10:39,910 So what is driving those colonization rates? 204 00:10:39,910 --> 00:10:41,560 And same for extinction, 205 00:10:41,560 --> 00:10:46,560 so patches that were colonized in 2018 drop-off period 206 00:10:47,100 --> 00:10:50,970 but then in the following questing period of 2018 207 00:10:50,970 --> 00:10:52,050 moose were not there. 208 00:10:52,050 --> 00:10:54,053 So what is driving these changes? 209 00:10:56,030 --> 00:10:59,440 So we used our presence to evaluate these changes 210 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:02,980 in occupancy patterns, across the patches and through time. 211 00:11:02,980 --> 00:11:05,900 So we created a model set of 24 models 212 00:11:05,900 --> 00:11:09,360 each representing an alternative hypothesis 213 00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:12,740 explaining these changes in occupancy. 214 00:11:12,740 --> 00:11:15,490 I don't have time to go into the model set 215 00:11:15,490 --> 00:11:18,460 but just know that there was one clear top model 216 00:11:18,460 --> 00:11:23,460 that was examining the probabilities of extinction 217 00:11:23,640 --> 00:11:27,350 and colonization as a function of the habitat structure 218 00:11:27,350 --> 00:11:29,083 and composition variables. 219 00:11:30,670 --> 00:11:33,570 So this brings us to the key results for objective one. 220 00:11:33,570 --> 00:11:36,610 So we mapped the probabilities of both the colonization 221 00:11:36,610 --> 00:11:39,300 and the extinction rates for our top model. 222 00:11:39,300 --> 00:11:42,110 So the areas of darker red in our study area 223 00:11:42,110 --> 00:11:44,750 are showing higher probabilities 224 00:11:44,750 --> 00:11:47,300 of either extinction or colonization, 225 00:11:47,300 --> 00:11:49,610 while the white patches are showing areas 226 00:11:49,610 --> 00:11:51,730 of lower probabilities. 227 00:11:51,730 --> 00:11:54,550 So there are a couple of key takeaways from this figure. 228 00:11:54,550 --> 00:11:57,720 Number one in the upper right-hand figure 229 00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:00,040 we notice that during the fall questing period 230 00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:02,650 the probability of extinction is very low 231 00:12:02,650 --> 00:12:04,880 for most patches in our study area. 232 00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:08,140 And this likely means that moose are moving around much more 233 00:12:08,140 --> 00:12:09,360 during this time, 234 00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:10,910 which makes sense given what we know 235 00:12:10,910 --> 00:12:13,910 about moose behavior during the mating season. 236 00:12:13,910 --> 00:12:16,540 Given that, let's focus on the time period 237 00:12:16,540 --> 00:12:18,820 when moose are dropping ticks on the landscape. 238 00:12:18,820 --> 00:12:21,000 So the two figures on the left. 239 00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:23,130 So patches where the probability 240 00:12:23,130 --> 00:12:27,880 of extinction was low and colonization was high 241 00:12:27,880 --> 00:12:29,720 during the spring drop-off period, 242 00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:31,670 is really showing these areas with the 243 00:12:31,670 --> 00:12:35,110 highest probability of moose occupancy. 244 00:12:35,110 --> 00:12:36,990 And these are really characterized 245 00:12:36,990 --> 00:12:40,880 by higher proportions of young or shrub forage 246 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:44,550 mixed forest at those greater elevations. 247 00:12:44,550 --> 00:12:48,240 I think it's also really important at this point to remember 248 00:12:48,240 --> 00:12:51,200 that where winter ticks drop-off moose, 249 00:12:51,200 --> 00:12:54,113 is likely where they will quest the following fall. 250 00:12:55,290 --> 00:12:57,900 So this brings us to our next objective. 251 00:12:57,900 --> 00:13:00,610 Are there important patterns or relationships 252 00:13:00,610 --> 00:13:04,610 between the habitats adult female moose are selecting 253 00:13:04,610 --> 00:13:07,200 during that period when they're picking ticks up 254 00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:08,933 and the fate of their offspring. 255 00:13:11,060 --> 00:13:13,757 So to determine these patterns of habitat selection 256 00:13:13,757 --> 00:13:15,380 and the fate of their offspring, 257 00:13:15,380 --> 00:13:18,150 we radio collar moose in January, 258 00:13:18,150 --> 00:13:20,330 we would follow these adult females 259 00:13:21,410 --> 00:13:23,540 throughout the winter into early may 260 00:13:23,540 --> 00:13:26,210 when they typically gave birth to a calf, 261 00:13:26,210 --> 00:13:28,900 we'd follow that calf through the summertime, 262 00:13:28,900 --> 00:13:30,410 come the following January 263 00:13:30,410 --> 00:13:34,520 we asked the capture crew to really target these cows 264 00:13:34,520 --> 00:13:36,150 that we knew had calves. 265 00:13:36,150 --> 00:13:38,340 So we had observed them all summer. 266 00:13:38,340 --> 00:13:43,340 And they were able to go out and capture 10 cow calf pairs. 267 00:13:43,960 --> 00:13:47,390 And what this allowed for was this inference 268 00:13:47,390 --> 00:13:49,980 of where was that cow calf pair 269 00:13:49,980 --> 00:13:53,240 during the fall time period when they were picking up ticks. 270 00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:56,360 And now that we've collared that calf in January 271 00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:57,840 we know their ultimate fate, 272 00:13:57,840 --> 00:14:01,490 so some died due to heavy winter tick infestations 273 00:14:01,490 --> 00:14:02,630 and some lived, 274 00:14:02,630 --> 00:14:04,853 and thankfully it was split in half. 275 00:14:06,530 --> 00:14:09,110 So from this two resource selection functions 276 00:14:09,110 --> 00:14:11,310 were estimated one for adult females 277 00:14:11,310 --> 00:14:14,010 whose calves survived age one, 278 00:14:14,010 --> 00:14:17,130 and one for adult females whose calves perished 279 00:14:17,130 --> 00:14:19,140 prior to age one. 280 00:14:19,140 --> 00:14:21,460 So due to time, I just wanna quickly breeze 281 00:14:21,460 --> 00:14:24,420 through these methods for objective two. 282 00:14:24,420 --> 00:14:26,360 So we greeted the landscape 283 00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:28,300 but this time at a much finer scale, 284 00:14:28,300 --> 00:14:30,880 so 200 meters squared patches. 285 00:14:30,880 --> 00:14:34,150 Also similar to objective one we performed this PSA 286 00:14:34,150 --> 00:14:36,510 to really account for complexities 287 00:14:36,510 --> 00:14:39,873 and correlation between our habitat variable. 288 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:44,300 So for each resource selection function, 289 00:14:44,300 --> 00:14:48,340 we estimated used or unused patches 290 00:14:48,340 --> 00:14:49,970 as a function of the different 291 00:14:49,970 --> 00:14:53,290 principle components describing our habitat variables. 292 00:14:53,290 --> 00:14:57,500 So for each individual, we used all of the patches they used 293 00:14:57,500 --> 00:15:00,620 and a thousand randomly selected unused patches. 294 00:15:00,620 --> 00:15:03,050 We then repeated this 10,000 times 295 00:15:03,050 --> 00:15:05,160 to end up with a resource selection function 296 00:15:05,160 --> 00:15:07,000 for each individual. 297 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:09,750 So these were then aggregated across the individuals 298 00:15:09,750 --> 00:15:12,040 who had calves that lived versus those 299 00:15:12,040 --> 00:15:13,413 who had calves that died. 300 00:15:14,570 --> 00:15:17,650 So this brings us to our key results for objective two. 301 00:15:17,650 --> 00:15:20,440 So if we look at this figure here on the X-axis 302 00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:24,150 our principle components describing our habitat variables 303 00:15:24,150 --> 00:15:26,300 and on the Y-axis are our estimates. 304 00:15:26,300 --> 00:15:29,000 And so we can see from this box plot 305 00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:32,360 that if a cow has a calf that died, 306 00:15:32,360 --> 00:15:34,250 so fate equals zero, 307 00:15:34,250 --> 00:15:39,250 those clear bars versus the cows with calves that survived 308 00:15:39,490 --> 00:15:41,440 there are clear differences in how 309 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:43,220 they are selecting habitats 310 00:15:43,220 --> 00:15:45,070 when they're picking up winter ticks. 311 00:15:46,450 --> 00:15:50,150 And so this brings us to the major key result 312 00:15:50,150 --> 00:15:53,930 which is females with calves that died 313 00:15:53,930 --> 00:15:56,610 were selecting habitats with higher proportions 314 00:15:56,610 --> 00:15:59,660 of young, mixed forest at higher elevations. 315 00:15:59,660 --> 00:16:01,860 And if you remember from objective one, 316 00:16:01,860 --> 00:16:06,200 these were areas where the probability of occupancy 317 00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:07,600 during the time period 318 00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:09,530 when they're dropping ticks was highest. 319 00:16:09,530 --> 00:16:12,850 So where the highest occupancy of moose 320 00:16:12,850 --> 00:16:14,800 where they're dropping their ticks, 321 00:16:14,800 --> 00:16:17,890 cows that were spending the most time in those areas 322 00:16:17,890 --> 00:16:22,270 where their offspring were perishing 323 00:16:22,270 --> 00:16:25,350 from heavy winter tick infestations. 324 00:16:25,350 --> 00:16:28,770 While the individuals with calves that survived 325 00:16:28,770 --> 00:16:31,000 were selecting habitats with 326 00:16:31,000 --> 00:16:33,460 adequate young deciduous forest, 327 00:16:33,460 --> 00:16:37,890 but also habitats with higher proportions of mature canopy, 328 00:16:37,890 --> 00:16:41,250 evergreen forest, and wetlands at lower elevations. 329 00:16:41,250 --> 00:16:44,750 So their second order habitat selection patterns 330 00:16:44,750 --> 00:16:49,420 were deviating from the majority of the moose 331 00:16:49,420 --> 00:16:51,253 in their occupancy analysis. 332 00:16:52,730 --> 00:16:54,620 So these are really exciting results 333 00:16:54,620 --> 00:16:56,880 in that they show fitness consequences 334 00:16:56,880 --> 00:17:00,470 of habitat selection decisions made by female moose 335 00:17:00,470 --> 00:17:03,110 during that time when they're picking up ticks. 336 00:17:03,110 --> 00:17:07,350 In our analysis of first and second order habitat selection 337 00:17:07,350 --> 00:17:10,030 in combination with Healey's 2018 338 00:17:10,030 --> 00:17:12,150 third-order habitat selection, 339 00:17:12,150 --> 00:17:14,450 really gives this detailed examination 340 00:17:14,450 --> 00:17:17,540 of moose habitat selection patterns 341 00:17:17,540 --> 00:17:20,780 and how those selection decisions may ultimately relate 342 00:17:20,780 --> 00:17:23,060 to winter tick infestations. 343 00:17:23,060 --> 00:17:24,840 So in terms of management, 344 00:17:24,840 --> 00:17:28,230 our model coefficients and mapped results 345 00:17:28,230 --> 00:17:31,060 really help to define these potential hotspots 346 00:17:31,060 --> 00:17:34,370 for both moose and for winter ticks. 347 00:17:34,370 --> 00:17:36,850 And so Timber Management, for instance, 348 00:17:36,850 --> 00:17:41,810 may benefit from this knowledge of potential hotspots 349 00:17:41,810 --> 00:17:45,400 by encouraging habitats that benefit both moose 350 00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:47,920 but limit winter tick loads. 351 00:17:47,920 --> 00:17:50,510 So potentially encouraging uneven age 352 00:17:50,510 --> 00:17:52,343 selective cuts for example. 353 00:17:53,560 --> 00:17:54,910 In terms of winter ticks, 354 00:17:54,910 --> 00:17:58,900 little is known about the ecology, abundance and management 355 00:17:58,900 --> 00:18:01,310 of these winter ticks in their natural settings. 356 00:18:01,310 --> 00:18:05,830 So management and research may benefit from these 357 00:18:05,830 --> 00:18:08,260 the knowledge of these potential hotspots 358 00:18:08,260 --> 00:18:11,620 and really focus future research that can ultimately 359 00:18:11,620 --> 00:18:13,610 help break the negative impacts 360 00:18:13,610 --> 00:18:16,373 of this winter tick moose cycle. 361 00:18:17,560 --> 00:18:19,800 So with that, I will end my talk here today, 362 00:18:19,800 --> 00:18:21,540 thank you so much for listening, 363 00:18:21,540 --> 00:18:23,110 I just wanna give a real quick shout out 364 00:18:23,110 --> 00:18:25,630 to some of the organizations that made this study possible 365 00:18:25,630 --> 00:18:28,250 such as the Silvio Conte Wildlife Refuge, 366 00:18:28,250 --> 00:18:29,710 and all the kind staff there 367 00:18:29,710 --> 00:18:32,580 particularly Refuge Manager, Steve Agius, 368 00:18:32,580 --> 00:18:34,710 also to VELCO for their continued support 369 00:18:34,710 --> 00:18:36,570 throughout the project. 370 00:18:36,570 --> 00:18:39,160 A handful of people to thank, particularly my advisors 371 00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:41,410 Jen Murdoch, and Terry Donovan, 372 00:18:41,410 --> 00:18:45,010 and folks from the State such as Cedric Alexander, 373 00:18:45,010 --> 00:18:47,940 Scott Darling, Mark Scott, and Tony Smith. 374 00:18:47,940 --> 00:18:49,220 So thank you for tuning in 375 00:18:49,220 --> 00:18:52,170 and I'll be happy to answer any questions folks might have. 376 00:18:56,020 --> 00:18:57,765 - [Jason] This is Jason Helf. 377 00:18:57,765 --> 00:18:58,598 Can you hear me - [Joshua] Oh hey Jason 378 00:18:58,598 --> 00:18:59,733 yep I can hear you. 379 00:18:59,733 --> 00:19:01,990 - [Jason] It's really interesting that it looks 380 00:19:01,990 --> 00:19:04,630 like the high elevation habitats may pose 381 00:19:04,630 --> 00:19:06,330 to be maybe a little bit riskier 382 00:19:06,330 --> 00:19:08,720 for tick acquisition for these moose, 383 00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:12,400 so I'm thinking with respect to climate change, 384 00:19:12,400 --> 00:19:14,400 is that potentially a good thing? 385 00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:17,280 Does that suggest that these lower elevation habitats 386 00:19:17,280 --> 00:19:22,200 may provide viable areas for moose longer than we think 387 00:19:22,200 --> 00:19:23,350 moving into the future? 388 00:19:25,020 --> 00:19:26,630 - [Joshua] Yeah, I think that's a really good question 389 00:19:26,630 --> 00:19:28,053 and a good point, 390 00:19:29,050 --> 00:19:30,370 because I think it's important 391 00:19:30,370 --> 00:19:32,670 when we're thinking about the relationship 392 00:19:32,670 --> 00:19:35,310 between winter ticks and mooses, 393 00:19:35,310 --> 00:19:38,667 how weather may ultimately affect winter ticks. 394 00:19:38,667 --> 00:19:42,170 And we know from some research at UVM 395 00:19:42,170 --> 00:19:45,910 with Sheryl Sullivan's work and others elsewhere 396 00:19:45,910 --> 00:19:49,760 in New England in kind of a laboratory setting, 397 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:52,860 that weather and cold can really impact these winter ticks 398 00:19:52,860 --> 00:19:56,110 and so, yeah, maybe these higher elevation habitats 399 00:19:56,110 --> 00:19:59,940 may prove to be detrimental for winter ticks 400 00:19:59,940 --> 00:20:01,160 as the weather changes. 401 00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:05,593 It's hard to know but I think the big takeaway is, 402 00:20:06,690 --> 00:20:09,800 this is pointing towards kind of supporting the theory 403 00:20:09,800 --> 00:20:13,560 of higher moose densities are kind of driving 404 00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:15,160 this parasite load. 405 00:20:15,160 --> 00:20:18,460 And so those cows or calves that are kind of 406 00:20:18,460 --> 00:20:20,570 selecting the perimeter, 407 00:20:20,570 --> 00:20:24,330 the periphery habitats that may be 408 00:20:24,330 --> 00:20:27,070 seen as potentially suboptimal 409 00:20:27,070 --> 00:20:28,840 in terms of forage and things, 410 00:20:28,840 --> 00:20:32,790 may ultimately be really beneficial for their fitness. 411 00:20:32,790 --> 00:20:36,760 And so, yeah, it's an interesting dynamic there but 412 00:20:36,760 --> 00:20:39,570 it's a good question about future weather patterns 413 00:20:39,570 --> 00:20:43,163 and how that might affect that the tick levels as well.