1 00:00:06,076 --> 00:00:08,130 All right, so today I'm going to be talking 2 00:00:08,130 --> 00:00:12,030 about how effective dogs versus humans are 3 00:00:12,030 --> 00:00:15,480 at being able to detect spotted lanternfly egg masses 4 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:18,430 not the adults but the actual egg masses. 5 00:00:18,430 --> 00:00:21,111 And if I can advance this, there we go. 6 00:00:21,111 --> 00:00:23,490 So there's a huge team that's been involved 7 00:00:23,490 --> 00:00:26,670 in this work and I'd like to first acknowledge the co-PIs 8 00:00:26,670 --> 00:00:30,490 on the project, Carrie Brown- Lima, and Ann Hajek, as well 9 00:00:31,806 --> 00:00:34,117 as everyone else on this slide that's contributed either 10 00:00:34,117 --> 00:00:37,980 with working with us as collaborators or in the field. 11 00:00:37,980 --> 00:00:40,710 So, many thanks to the large team and funding 12 00:00:40,710 --> 00:00:43,210 by the Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability. 13 00:00:44,610 --> 00:00:47,940 For folks who don't know much about spotted lanternfly, 14 00:00:47,940 --> 00:00:50,310 I'll give you a very brief background about them. 15 00:00:50,310 --> 00:00:53,940 They're thought to have been introduced 16 00:00:53,940 --> 00:00:55,890 from Asia on these stone slabs. 17 00:00:55,890 --> 00:00:58,380 They lay their egg masses on smooth surfaces. 18 00:00:58,380 --> 00:00:59,790 So you can see the picture 19 00:00:59,790 --> 00:01:02,370 on the upper right are the actual egg masses. 20 00:01:02,370 --> 00:01:06,150 These are the egg masses you can see 21 00:01:06,150 --> 00:01:08,250 on that stone slab. 22 00:01:08,250 --> 00:01:09,360 In 2014, 23 00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:11,910 and they arrived in Pennsylvania. 24 00:01:11,910 --> 00:01:13,350 And then despite a lot 25 00:01:13,350 --> 00:01:15,480 of efforts that have been ongoing to try to 26 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:17,850 prevent the spread, they've rapidly spread. 27 00:01:17,850 --> 00:01:21,090 I'll show a map in the next slide of that spread. 28 00:01:21,090 --> 00:01:22,530 So they're plant hoppers 29 00:01:22,530 --> 00:01:25,080 and they have these piercing, sucking mouth parts 30 00:01:25,080 --> 00:01:28,860 and they feed on and damage agricultural species, 31 00:01:28,860 --> 00:01:32,970 primarily grapes, apples, hops, peaches. 32 00:01:32,970 --> 00:01:34,904 And one of the characteristics 33 00:01:34,904 --> 00:01:37,830 of them is they excrete something called honey dew. 34 00:01:37,830 --> 00:01:40,500 And once they excrete that honey dew, for example, 35 00:01:40,500 --> 00:01:42,870 on the leaves, then there's a sooty mold that grows 36 00:01:42,870 --> 00:01:45,960 on top of them, on top of the honey dew. 37 00:01:45,960 --> 00:01:49,620 And that further damages both the crop itself 38 00:01:49,620 --> 00:01:50,643 and the leaves. 39 00:01:51,510 --> 00:01:53,243 In addition to the damage of the crops, 40 00:01:53,243 --> 00:01:56,310 they also swarm in very large numbers 41 00:01:56,310 --> 00:01:58,444 and can be quite the annoyance 42 00:01:58,444 --> 00:02:00,513 if you're trying to do anything outside. 43 00:02:01,740 --> 00:02:03,240 This is the distribution room. 44 00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:06,540 This was actually October 26th 45 00:02:06,540 --> 00:02:08,820 and they have spreads since October 26th. 46 00:02:08,820 --> 00:02:10,920 I just checked the new map yesterday 47 00:02:10,920 --> 00:02:12,360 which I didn't upload here 48 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:14,196 but there are actually new infestations, 49 00:02:14,196 --> 00:02:17,640 especially this new one popped up right here. 50 00:02:17,640 --> 00:02:19,920 So that's now considered an infestation rather 51 00:02:19,920 --> 00:02:21,420 than just an occurrence. 52 00:02:21,420 --> 00:02:26,420 So, the initial spotted lanternfly introduction 53 00:02:26,490 --> 00:02:29,843 was right here in Berks County, Pennsylvania in 2014. 54 00:02:29,843 --> 00:02:31,740 Now you can see they're 55 00:02:31,740 --> 00:02:35,587 in York, Massachusetts, Michigan, Indiana, North Carolina. 56 00:02:35,587 --> 00:02:39,810 So, rapidly spreading in Vermont. 57 00:02:39,810 --> 00:02:42,330 You can see in the [Indistinct] area right there, 58 00:02:42,330 --> 00:02:46,653 an individual detection. 59 00:02:48,718 --> 00:02:50,283 No invasion as of this point. 60 00:02:52,050 --> 00:02:54,750 And if we're thinking about managing invasive species, 61 00:02:54,750 --> 00:02:57,690 particularly if we're thinking about just single individuals 62 00:02:57,690 --> 00:03:00,420 or very small populations, we want to try to be 63 00:03:00,420 --> 00:03:03,900 in this realm of eradication or maybe containing 64 00:03:03,900 --> 00:03:05,760 the population. 65 00:03:05,760 --> 00:03:07,620 In Pennsylvania and New Jersey now, 66 00:03:07,620 --> 00:03:08,790 they're beyond the point 67 00:03:08,790 --> 00:03:11,130 of trying to contain or eradicate. 68 00:03:11,130 --> 00:03:13,800 This is where there is like asset protection mode. 69 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:16,770 But when we started this project in New York, 70 00:03:16,770 --> 00:03:19,860 we're at this stage of not having infestations. 71 00:03:19,860 --> 00:03:23,520 And so we were thinking about how do we prevent them 72 00:03:23,520 --> 00:03:25,830 from coming into the state from Pennsylvania. 73 00:03:25,830 --> 00:03:27,150 They're like knocking on our door 74 00:03:27,150 --> 00:03:28,680 and we don't want them to come in. 75 00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:32,250 That's what Vermont's situation is right now, right? 76 00:03:32,250 --> 00:03:34,260 And so, we started to think about 77 00:03:34,260 --> 00:03:37,140 these early detection, rapid response approaches 78 00:03:37,140 --> 00:03:39,250 that might be suitable for use in New York 79 00:03:40,110 --> 00:03:42,300 but it's challenging 80 00:03:42,300 --> 00:03:43,740 because 81 00:03:43,740 --> 00:03:47,070 the egg masses are very camouflaged 82 00:03:47,070 --> 00:03:48,600 and they're very difficult to find. 83 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:51,720 So this tree right here has an egg mass on it. 84 00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:52,653 Can anyone see it? 85 00:03:54,300 --> 00:03:55,490 No, probably not. 86 00:03:55,490 --> 00:03:57,150 I'm gonna zoom in, 87 00:03:57,150 --> 00:03:57,983 now, 88 00:03:57,983 --> 00:03:59,160 Can you see it there? 89 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:01,443 Still probably not is my guess. 90 00:04:02,610 --> 00:04:03,660 There it is right there. 91 00:04:03,660 --> 00:04:05,850 So they're extremely, extremely camouflaged, 92 00:04:05,850 --> 00:04:07,080 very hard to find. 93 00:04:07,080 --> 00:04:09,270 So even humans where you know 94 00:04:09,270 --> 00:04:10,718 it is on a tree, 95 00:04:10,718 --> 00:04:13,410 it's very easy to overlook them. 96 00:04:13,410 --> 00:04:15,990 And so given the complexity with trying to find them, 97 00:04:15,990 --> 00:04:17,047 what we did is we said, 98 00:04:17,047 --> 00:04:20,790 "Well, can we use dogs to try to find the egg masses?" 99 00:04:20,790 --> 00:04:22,590 Something that's very camouflage. 100 00:04:22,590 --> 00:04:24,540 Dogs can use their olfactory senses, 101 00:04:24,540 --> 00:04:27,720 we can train the dogs to smell the egg masses. 102 00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:28,553 And especially 103 00:04:28,553 --> 00:04:29,700 that honey dew 104 00:04:29,700 --> 00:04:32,836 is something that they smell as well. 105 00:04:32,836 --> 00:04:34,805 Can we train these dogs to be able to 106 00:04:34,805 --> 00:04:36,510 to find the egg masses? 107 00:04:36,510 --> 00:04:38,700 So our detection dog team here, 108 00:04:38,700 --> 00:04:40,770 we used Dia and Fagan 109 00:04:40,770 --> 00:04:44,220 and they were our trustee field workers 110 00:04:44,220 --> 00:04:46,473 in addition to their handlers. 111 00:04:47,430 --> 00:04:50,970 We surveyed 20 vineyards in New Jersey 112 00:04:50,970 --> 00:04:53,490 and Pennsylvania and we surveyed them during the winter. 113 00:04:53,490 --> 00:04:55,980 So that's the only time of the year when 114 00:04:55,980 --> 00:04:58,848 the individuals, the species isn't moving, right? 115 00:04:58,848 --> 00:05:02,400 So there are no adults in the environment at that time. 116 00:05:02,400 --> 00:05:04,380 It's just these egg masses. 117 00:05:04,380 --> 00:05:06,733 So we could think about the population being closed at 118 00:05:06,733 --> 00:05:08,400 that period of time. 119 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:12,930 So, this was the original core in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. 120 00:05:12,930 --> 00:05:15,990 We're just east of that area. 121 00:05:15,990 --> 00:05:18,270 And where we were in New York 122 00:05:18,270 --> 00:05:19,770 and here's Cornell right up here. 123 00:05:19,770 --> 00:05:22,450 And this is the the border where 124 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:24,873 the area of concern is. 125 00:05:26,550 --> 00:05:29,190 For the survey methods, we surveyed 20 vineyards 126 00:05:29,190 --> 00:05:32,040 and then the surrounding natural areas and by natural areas 127 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:33,840 usually this was like the forested area, 128 00:05:33,840 --> 00:05:36,990 kind of the upland area that was adjacent to the vineyards. 129 00:05:36,990 --> 00:05:39,060 We had 12 different transects 130 00:05:39,060 --> 00:05:40,920 so that we're within the vineyard area. 131 00:05:40,920 --> 00:05:43,500 And the average length of those was about 20 meters. 132 00:05:43,500 --> 00:05:45,200 And then we had 20 transects that were 133 00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:47,520 in these adjacent forests. 134 00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:50,880 Those were about 26 meters in length. 135 00:05:50,880 --> 00:05:53,020 We had subunits that we surveyed 136 00:05:54,159 --> 00:05:56,940 and the subunits were kind of nested within these transects. 137 00:05:56,940 --> 00:05:58,980 And so, here is for example, a transect 138 00:05:58,980 --> 00:06:01,360 in the vineyard and you can see 139 00:06:03,497 --> 00:06:04,860 the vines right here. 140 00:06:04,860 --> 00:06:06,060 And this is a metal pole. 141 00:06:06,060 --> 00:06:08,580 I don't know if it's a little bit dark 142 00:06:08,580 --> 00:06:10,830 but there's metal poles that are usually between 143 00:06:10,830 --> 00:06:13,200 these vines kind of holding them up. 144 00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:14,820 Approximately every meter is where 145 00:06:14,820 --> 00:06:15,990 these vines or poles are. 146 00:06:15,990 --> 00:06:18,030 So we considered those as sub-units. 147 00:06:18,030 --> 00:06:20,817 And then also in the forest transect, we had these transects 148 00:06:20,817 --> 00:06:22,080 and we were able to divide 'em 149 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:23,763 up into these one meter segments. 150 00:06:24,750 --> 00:06:27,150 We repeated the survey two times with humans 151 00:06:27,150 --> 00:06:29,490 and we repeated the survey two times with dogs. 152 00:06:29,490 --> 00:06:31,350 So every transect we measured, 153 00:06:31,350 --> 00:06:33,030 the same transect we measured twice 154 00:06:33,030 --> 00:06:34,590 with both humans and dogs. 155 00:06:34,590 --> 00:06:36,210 And then we gave the humans 156 00:06:36,210 --> 00:06:38,940 and the dogs an unlimited search time. 157 00:06:38,940 --> 00:06:41,310 And something important is that all 158 00:06:41,310 --> 00:06:42,480 of the sites that we went 159 00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:45,300 to had a known visible infestation. 160 00:06:45,300 --> 00:06:46,500 We knew that there were going 161 00:06:46,500 --> 00:06:48,068 to be egg masses there. 162 00:06:48,068 --> 00:06:50,970 We didn't tell the dogs or the handlers where they are. 163 00:06:50,970 --> 00:06:52,560 We didn't tell the humans where the are, 164 00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:54,360 we just knew that that vineyard 165 00:06:54,360 --> 00:06:56,983 had some kind of egg masses on it. 166 00:06:56,983 --> 00:06:58,740 And the reason that we did that is 167 00:06:58,740 --> 00:07:00,201 because we're trying to compare the difference 168 00:07:00,201 --> 00:07:01,650 between humans and dogs. 169 00:07:01,650 --> 00:07:02,820 So we needed to go to sites 170 00:07:02,820 --> 00:07:05,580 that had something to be able to detect. 171 00:07:05,580 --> 00:07:09,750 So, this isn't a very early detection scenario 172 00:07:09,750 --> 00:07:11,250 per se 173 00:07:11,250 --> 00:07:13,923 because we knew it had some kind of infestation. 174 00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:18,810 For those of you who don't know about occupancy modeling, 175 00:07:18,810 --> 00:07:20,430 I'll give you a little overview of that 176 00:07:20,430 --> 00:07:24,330 because that's the method that we use to analyze these data. 177 00:07:24,330 --> 00:07:26,460 The occupancy modeling accounts 178 00:07:26,460 --> 00:07:29,970 for imperfect detection of organisms and surveys 179 00:07:29,970 --> 00:07:32,700 and the picture or the figure at the bottom, 180 00:07:32,700 --> 00:07:34,140 I'm going to go through 181 00:07:34,140 --> 00:07:35,400 what I mean by that. 182 00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:37,200 Basically, it uses presence data. 183 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:38,700 We'll denote that as a one 184 00:07:38,700 --> 00:07:42,123 and non detection data and we'll denote that as a zero. 185 00:07:43,753 --> 00:07:45,390 And we go out and we survey an area, 186 00:07:45,390 --> 00:07:46,440 we're gonna go out and we're going 187 00:07:46,440 --> 00:07:48,190 to survey for spotted lanternflies. 188 00:07:49,230 --> 00:07:52,020 We go out and either one of two things happens. 189 00:07:52,020 --> 00:07:53,730 We either see the species, 190 00:07:53,730 --> 00:07:56,280 we see the spotted lanternfly or we don't. 191 00:07:56,280 --> 00:07:58,803 So these are our field observations right here. 192 00:08:00,250 --> 00:08:01,710 If we go out and we see the spotted lanternfly, 193 00:08:01,710 --> 00:08:05,310 there's only one kind of biological reason why 194 00:08:05,310 --> 00:08:07,200 we could have seen that spotted lanternfly 195 00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:09,630 because it was actually there, right? 196 00:08:09,630 --> 00:08:10,710 But if we go out 197 00:08:10,710 --> 00:08:13,290 and we survey the area and we don't see the species, 198 00:08:13,290 --> 00:08:15,480 one of two things might be going on. 199 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:17,084 The biological reality might be 200 00:08:17,084 --> 00:08:19,080 well, it's actually not there. 201 00:08:19,080 --> 00:08:20,392 But a second possibility is 202 00:08:20,392 --> 00:08:22,560 the spotted lanternfly 203 00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:25,200 is actually there, but we just didn't see it. 204 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:29,790 So, this issue right here is where the problem comes 205 00:08:29,790 --> 00:08:32,760 in because this is our imperfect detection. 206 00:08:32,760 --> 00:08:35,040 So as humans or as dogs, 207 00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:38,250 we don't always see the biological reality. 208 00:08:38,250 --> 00:08:40,770 So that is what we'll call field observation error 209 00:08:40,770 --> 00:08:42,720 or this imperfect detection. 210 00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:46,080 And these occupancy models allow us to account 211 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:48,376 for this imperfect detection 212 00:08:48,376 --> 00:08:51,240 and we can estimate two parameters. 213 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:53,217 We can estimate the probability of occupancy, 214 00:08:53,217 --> 00:08:55,977 the probability that a site has that species 215 00:08:55,977 --> 00:08:57,330 and then the probability 216 00:08:57,330 --> 00:08:59,760 of detection given that species is there, 217 00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:02,100 what's our probability of being able to detect it? 218 00:09:02,100 --> 00:09:03,270 And that's what we did 219 00:09:03,270 --> 00:09:05,793 in the comparison of the humans versus the dogs. 220 00:09:06,900 --> 00:09:09,780 So we used this multi-scale occupancy model 221 00:09:09,780 --> 00:09:11,850 and the two scales are the transect level 222 00:09:11,850 --> 00:09:14,280 and then the subunit level within that transect. 223 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:15,674 The transects, 224 00:09:15,674 --> 00:09:18,420 we can think about those as being related 225 00:09:18,420 --> 00:09:21,390 to the probability of invasion from a source. 226 00:09:21,390 --> 00:09:22,873 So, if you're in the vineyard, 227 00:09:22,873 --> 00:09:25,500 it's most likely to be invaded 228 00:09:25,500 --> 00:09:26,950 from the forest site because 229 00:09:26,950 --> 00:09:29,770 the spotted lanternfly is associated 230 00:09:29,770 --> 00:09:32,900 with true species like tree of heaven that are likely coming 231 00:09:32,900 --> 00:09:35,790 from the surrounding natural areas. 232 00:09:35,790 --> 00:09:38,400 And then the subunits within that transect, 233 00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:41,460 each individual vine or pole or one meter segment 234 00:09:41,460 --> 00:09:44,070 within the forest can be thought to be related 235 00:09:44,070 --> 00:09:46,410 to the intensity of infestation. 236 00:09:46,410 --> 00:09:49,800 So how many of those one meter segments within 237 00:09:49,800 --> 00:09:51,449 that transect 238 00:09:51,449 --> 00:09:54,690 have the spotted lanternfly egg masses? 239 00:09:54,690 --> 00:09:56,850 And then we could estimate the detection probability 240 00:09:56,850 --> 00:10:00,390 of the subunits and compare humans versus dogs. 241 00:10:00,390 --> 00:10:02,580 So here are the occupancy results. 242 00:10:02,580 --> 00:10:04,380 First off, at the transect level, 243 00:10:04,380 --> 00:10:07,140 so this is an individual transect in the vineyard 244 00:10:07,140 --> 00:10:10,380 or an individual transect within the forest area. 245 00:10:10,380 --> 00:10:15,030 The occupancy of egg masses was very high in both of them. 246 00:10:15,030 --> 00:10:20,030 Within the vineyards, 0.94 and then within the forest, 0.85. 247 00:10:20,520 --> 00:10:23,220 So most of the transects that we were surveying 248 00:10:23,220 --> 00:10:25,050 had egg masses on them. 249 00:10:25,050 --> 00:10:27,923 However, if we go down to the subunit level, 250 00:10:27,923 --> 00:10:30,540 this is within those one meter segments, 251 00:10:30,540 --> 00:10:32,610 the vineyard had an occupancy 252 00:10:32,610 --> 00:10:37,203 at the subunit level of 0.47 and the forest at 0.13. 253 00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:41,220 And so despite very high occupancy at 254 00:10:41,220 --> 00:10:44,913 both the vineyards and the forest at the transect level, 255 00:10:46,181 --> 00:10:47,070 the forest had much lower, 256 00:10:47,070 --> 00:10:50,580 we could think of it as infestation level 257 00:10:50,580 --> 00:10:54,085 within the individual one meter transects. 258 00:10:54,085 --> 00:10:56,400 And this is showing the subunit occupancy 259 00:10:56,400 --> 00:10:58,800 on the right, we have the occupancy probability 260 00:10:58,800 --> 00:11:01,914 on the Y axis and then we're comparing vines, 261 00:11:01,914 --> 00:11:04,290 the metal poles within the vineyard. 262 00:11:04,290 --> 00:11:06,000 So those are kind of combined 263 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:07,890 into what we're calling the vineyard 264 00:11:07,890 --> 00:11:09,360 and then the forested sites. 265 00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:11,490 So two things that you'll see, one is 266 00:11:11,490 --> 00:11:15,750 that the higher infestation sites had a higher probability 267 00:11:15,750 --> 00:11:17,190 of occupancy. 268 00:11:17,190 --> 00:11:18,360 And then the second thing 269 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:21,780 is that the metal poles had a higher probability 270 00:11:21,780 --> 00:11:24,600 of occupancy than did the vines. 271 00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:27,810 And so I mentioned that the spotted lanternfly likes to 272 00:11:27,810 --> 00:11:30,510 lay their egg masses on smooth surfaces 273 00:11:30,510 --> 00:11:35,510 and the metal poles are smooth relative to the rough vines. 274 00:11:35,790 --> 00:11:36,688 So they, 275 00:11:36,688 --> 00:11:40,110 kind of have a say a "preference" 276 00:11:40,110 --> 00:11:43,776 for these vines or for the poles over the vines. 277 00:11:43,776 --> 00:11:48,231 We can also look at the distance 278 00:11:48,231 --> 00:11:49,590 from forest. 279 00:11:49,590 --> 00:11:53,010 So, we have the vineyard transects that were laid out. 280 00:11:53,010 --> 00:11:54,480 We surveyed these transects 281 00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:56,310 but we could measure the distance 282 00:11:56,310 --> 00:11:58,710 from that transect to that upland forest 283 00:11:58,710 --> 00:12:00,990 and look at the probability of occupancy 284 00:12:00,990 --> 00:12:04,440 as a function of how far away it is from the forest. 285 00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:06,044 And our prediction would be 286 00:12:06,044 --> 00:12:09,860 that the occupancy should be higher the closer you are 287 00:12:09,860 --> 00:12:11,520 to the forests because that's 288 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:13,320 where the adults would be coming 289 00:12:13,320 --> 00:12:15,180 from out of the forest because 290 00:12:15,180 --> 00:12:18,540 of that association with with tree of heaven for example. 291 00:12:18,540 --> 00:12:20,250 And that's exactly what we saw. 292 00:12:20,250 --> 00:12:22,550 This is the occupancy probability 293 00:12:22,550 --> 00:12:25,440 and distance to forest on the x axis. 294 00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:27,870 And the closer you are to the forest, 295 00:12:27,870 --> 00:12:30,183 the higher the probability of occupancy. 296 00:12:31,080 --> 00:12:32,850 As you get away from the forest, 297 00:12:32,850 --> 00:12:35,370 within those transects, there was a lower probability 298 00:12:35,370 --> 00:12:37,833 that there was going to be egg masses there. 299 00:12:37,833 --> 00:12:39,180 So this has implications for where you might think 300 00:12:39,180 --> 00:12:42,960 about searching for egg masses within vineyards. 301 00:12:42,960 --> 00:12:47,040 If you look at this, somewhere around 75 meters 302 00:12:47,040 --> 00:12:49,632 or closer, would be really good places to search 303 00:12:49,632 --> 00:12:53,553 since those have the highest occupancy probabilities. 304 00:12:55,350 --> 00:12:56,940 This is consistent with a study 305 00:12:56,940 --> 00:13:00,390 in Pennsylvania where they were looking at egg masses 306 00:13:00,390 --> 00:13:03,240 and they found that 44% of them were 307 00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:06,780 within 15 meters of the edge of the vineyard. 308 00:13:06,780 --> 00:13:09,813 So again, there's strong association with the forest. 309 00:13:11,160 --> 00:13:13,260 Now I'm switching to the detection results. 310 00:13:13,260 --> 00:13:16,560 This is the difference between the humans and the dogs. 311 00:13:16,560 --> 00:13:18,570 And if you look 312 00:13:18,570 --> 00:13:21,690 at the figure on the right, 313 00:13:21,690 --> 00:13:24,160 this is detection probability on the Y axis. 314 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:26,490 We have the humans searching the vineyards 315 00:13:26,490 --> 00:13:28,290 and the dogs serving the vineyards, 316 00:13:28,290 --> 00:13:29,580 humans searching the forest 317 00:13:29,580 --> 00:13:31,500 and then dogs surveying the forest. 318 00:13:31,500 --> 00:13:34,530 And what you can see here is that within the vineyards, 319 00:13:34,530 --> 00:13:37,017 humans had a higher detection probability 320 00:13:37,017 --> 00:13:38,580 than did the dogs. 321 00:13:38,580 --> 00:13:42,810 They had 1.8% higher detection probabilities 322 00:13:42,810 --> 00:13:44,220 than did the dogs. 323 00:13:44,220 --> 00:13:47,340 Now humans use visual search. 324 00:13:47,340 --> 00:13:50,430 The picture that I showed you on the tree was hard to see. 325 00:13:50,430 --> 00:13:52,717 But when you're in a vineyard and you're up close to 326 00:13:52,717 --> 00:13:57,540 a vine, a grapevine that is only this high, 327 00:13:57,540 --> 00:14:00,480 it's really easy to see all of the egg masses 328 00:14:00,480 --> 00:14:01,650 that are there. 329 00:14:01,650 --> 00:14:04,470 However, when you go out into the forest, 330 00:14:04,470 --> 00:14:06,690 we can see that the dogs are much better. 331 00:14:06,690 --> 00:14:09,240 The dogs had a much higher detection probability 332 00:14:09,240 --> 00:14:12,270 and did 3.4 times better than did the humans. 333 00:14:12,270 --> 00:14:13,140 And the reason why is 334 00:14:13,140 --> 00:14:15,960 because dogs can use their olfactory sensors 335 00:14:15,960 --> 00:14:19,080 and we as humans are pretty useless in that context. 336 00:14:19,080 --> 00:14:20,958 It's really hard brushy vegetation, 337 00:14:20,958 --> 00:14:24,180 we don't know where to search, we can't see anything. 338 00:14:24,180 --> 00:14:25,890 Yeah, it's just like stems 339 00:14:25,890 --> 00:14:28,593 and leaves and it's like kind of impossible. 340 00:14:30,240 --> 00:14:32,250 We can also think about the search efficiency. 341 00:14:32,250 --> 00:14:33,950 So we had detections, 342 00:14:33,950 --> 00:14:37,350 how well we're doing at detecting them 343 00:14:37,350 --> 00:14:39,480 but if you think about how much time it took, 344 00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:41,913 this turns into an issue of costs. 345 00:14:42,864 --> 00:14:45,360 So, the dogs actually ended up searching 346 00:14:45,360 --> 00:14:47,970 for a longer period of time than humans. 347 00:14:47,970 --> 00:14:51,419 And in the vineyards, the humans had more detections 348 00:14:51,419 --> 00:14:56,419 and the time that it took didn't overcome the dogs. 349 00:14:57,447 --> 00:14:59,790 And so the human, the number of detections 350 00:14:59,790 --> 00:15:02,630 per hour was 31 detections per hour for humans, 351 00:15:02,630 --> 00:15:05,190 24 detections per hour for dogs. 352 00:15:05,190 --> 00:15:08,340 So humans were better in terms of their efficiency. 353 00:15:08,340 --> 00:15:10,830 In the forest, dogs were still slightly better 354 00:15:10,830 --> 00:15:12,870 despite the longer time that it took them 355 00:15:12,870 --> 00:15:13,980 to search these areas. 356 00:15:13,980 --> 00:15:16,590 So it took dogs 7.6 detections 357 00:15:16,590 --> 00:15:18,990 or they did 7.6 detections 358 00:15:18,990 --> 00:15:23,010 per hour and humans had 6.7 detections per hour. 359 00:15:23,010 --> 00:15:24,930 However, I'll note that 360 00:15:24,930 --> 00:15:27,360 I think that the number of detections 361 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:30,060 and not the efficiency is probably more important when 362 00:15:30,060 --> 00:15:32,520 we're thinking about early detection situations where 363 00:15:32,520 --> 00:15:35,275 it's really important to be able to detect those 364 00:15:35,275 --> 00:15:36,948 individuals. 365 00:15:36,948 --> 00:15:40,233 So probably the cost of the search time 366 00:15:40,233 --> 00:15:44,223 is worth it relative to the the gain. 367 00:15:45,180 --> 00:15:48,750 And then infestation level, this is really not surprising. 368 00:15:48,750 --> 00:15:51,150 The higher infestation sites had higher detection 369 00:15:51,150 --> 00:15:53,670 probability, so there's just more egg masses that are 370 00:15:53,670 --> 00:15:55,619 available to be detected. 371 00:15:55,619 --> 00:15:58,410 Finally, what does this mean in practice, 372 00:15:58,410 --> 00:16:01,170 if you're going out there and doing some searches. 373 00:16:01,170 --> 00:16:04,590 One, I would recommend that you search vineyards 374 00:16:04,590 --> 00:16:05,970 that are closer to the forest, 375 00:16:05,970 --> 00:16:07,890 within about 75 meters. 376 00:16:07,890 --> 00:16:10,830 Second one is searching larger trees near the edges, 377 00:16:10,830 --> 00:16:14,610 especially at the higher elevations because the adults 378 00:16:14,610 --> 00:16:18,720 will be coming down from those higher elevation tree sites, 379 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:21,750 searching the metal poles and the vineyards is a good idea. 380 00:16:21,750 --> 00:16:23,990 And then using dogs to search the vineyards 381 00:16:23,990 --> 00:16:26,547 in these early detections situations is still 382 00:16:26,547 --> 00:16:27,600 a good approach. 383 00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:30,623 We were, again, we were surveying in what would be 384 00:16:30,623 --> 00:16:33,450 considered a moderate to high level infestation sites. 385 00:16:33,450 --> 00:16:35,226 And then the dogs were particularly good 386 00:16:35,226 --> 00:16:38,280 in the forested sites where humans kind 387 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:39,113 of fell apart 388 00:16:39,113 --> 00:16:43,410 because our visual search is impeded in those forest sites. 389 00:16:43,410 --> 00:16:47,820 So thank dogs have a great utility in these forested sites. 390 00:16:47,820 --> 00:16:49,590 Thanks to all the vineyard owners 391 00:16:49,590 --> 00:16:51,510 for access to their land. 392 00:16:51,510 --> 00:16:54,821 And then finally, I will take any questions. 393 00:16:54,821 --> 00:16:57,488 (students clap) 394 00:17:01,470 --> 00:17:03,480 [Moderator] Somebody in the chat does have a question. 395 00:17:03,480 --> 00:17:05,943 She asked, did the handlers ever report, 396 00:17:08,397 --> 00:17:10,800 Did the handlers ever report 397 00:17:10,800 --> 00:17:15,387 that the dogs alert for lanternfly when not working? 398 00:17:15,387 --> 00:17:19,184 And if it gets widespread and established with the dogs 399 00:17:19,184 --> 00:17:22,170 then would the dogs always be working? 400 00:17:22,170 --> 00:17:25,545 Yeah. So this issue of the dogs, 401 00:17:25,545 --> 00:17:27,420 so I can probably for folks 402 00:17:27,420 --> 00:17:30,237 that don't know how the dogs work, I go over them 403 00:17:30,237 --> 00:17:34,200 but basically you're training the dogs to detect something 404 00:17:34,200 --> 00:17:37,800 and the dogs are motivated by like any normal dog, 405 00:17:37,800 --> 00:17:39,300 they're motivated by the attention, 406 00:17:39,300 --> 00:17:41,610 they're motivated by some kind of reward. 407 00:17:41,610 --> 00:17:44,970 So every time that they find an egg mass, 408 00:17:44,970 --> 00:17:45,837 you have to reward them 409 00:17:45,837 --> 00:17:47,811 and you throw them a ball and you know, like a 410 00:17:47,811 --> 00:17:49,850 think about a yellow lab or something, 411 00:17:49,850 --> 00:17:51,300 they're just like, "Oh yeah." 412 00:17:51,300 --> 00:17:52,920 and then they go get the ball. 413 00:17:52,920 --> 00:17:55,320 They wanna keep working because you know 414 00:17:55,320 --> 00:17:57,453 their handler just rewarded them. 415 00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:00,810 So, this issue about the number 416 00:18:00,810 --> 00:18:03,270 of detections is particularly important 417 00:18:03,270 --> 00:18:06,960 because if they are everywhere, 418 00:18:06,960 --> 00:18:08,640 you're gonna have to keep rewarding them 419 00:18:08,640 --> 00:18:09,990 and rewarding them and rewarding them. 420 00:18:09,990 --> 00:18:11,730 So we did have to reward them. 421 00:18:11,730 --> 00:18:14,970 The dogs are basically pulled when the search 422 00:18:14,970 --> 00:18:16,118 is done. 423 00:18:16,118 --> 00:18:17,033 So, in terms of, 424 00:18:17,033 --> 00:18:20,553 are they still finding them when they're not working? 425 00:18:21,649 --> 00:18:23,640 There's a signal basically 426 00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:26,580 that the handler handler will use to tell the dog, 427 00:18:26,580 --> 00:18:28,551 like, "Okay, now it's work time." 428 00:18:28,551 --> 00:18:30,933 So there isn't necessarily that issue. 429 00:18:31,909 --> 00:18:33,287 [Moderator] You have one more minute 430 00:18:33,287 --> 00:18:36,939 if you want to take this last question. 431 00:18:36,939 --> 00:18:39,480 [Student] Will you be publishing 432 00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:41,670 this somewhere accessible? 433 00:18:41,670 --> 00:18:43,440 Yep, we're writing it up right now. 434 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:46,829 And so I'd say we'll send it out to a journal probably 435 00:18:46,829 --> 00:18:49,383 in the next two months, something like that. 436 00:18:51,497 --> 00:18:52,900 [Moderator] Thank you. 437 00:18:52,900 --> 00:18:55,567 (students clap)