1 00:00:09,450 --> 00:00:12,060 All right, everyone. Go for it, Tracy and Tom. 2 00:00:12,060 --> 00:00:14,403 Thanks again for being here for this webinar. 3 00:00:18,243 --> 00:00:19,861 Okay, so I guess I'll start 4 00:00:19,861 --> 00:00:21,240 and just greet everybody as well. 5 00:00:21,240 --> 00:00:23,940 I'm Tom Faris with the Agency of Education. 6 00:00:23,940 --> 00:00:27,000 I'm going into my seventh year with the agency, now. 7 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:32,000 Prior to that, I worked in schools as a special educator 8 00:00:32,910 --> 00:00:36,360 and then as a school administrator for a number of years. 9 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:38,110 I've also worked in a variety 10 00:00:40,053 --> 00:00:42,769 of residential 11 00:00:42,769 --> 00:00:45,870 and other types of program settings. 12 00:00:45,870 --> 00:00:50,310 So my experience with restraint seclusion 13 00:00:50,310 --> 00:00:54,570 is pretty extensive in terms of experience 14 00:00:54,570 --> 00:00:55,683 as a practitioner. 15 00:00:56,610 --> 00:01:00,330 My involvement with the technical sides 16 00:01:00,330 --> 00:01:04,440 of Rule 4500 really began 17 00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:07,690 largely last February when I helped 18 00:01:08,536 --> 00:01:11,890 to take some responsibility for supervising reports 19 00:01:11,890 --> 00:01:14,190 that come into the agency regarding Rule 4500. 20 00:01:17,177 --> 00:01:18,870 And I'm Tracy Harris. 21 00:01:18,870 --> 00:01:22,740 Like Tom, I have also worked in public schools 22 00:01:22,740 --> 00:01:25,440 and approved independent schools 23 00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:29,163 in Vermont for many, many, many years. 24 00:01:30,900 --> 00:01:35,900 And I've been with the Agency of Ed for coming on, 25 00:01:36,665 --> 00:01:39,150 well, I guess it has been 12 years now, 26 00:01:39,150 --> 00:01:43,500 and I've been, up until a couple years ago, 27 00:01:43,500 --> 00:01:46,140 I was the lead at the agency 28 00:01:46,140 --> 00:01:49,773 for all things related to restraints and seclusions. 29 00:01:52,694 --> 00:01:55,140 But Tom is very capable, 30 00:01:55,140 --> 00:01:59,430 and now I am just pulled in as a content expert 31 00:01:59,430 --> 00:02:03,494 when there are tricky situations or when there're, 32 00:02:03,494 --> 00:02:05,760 I'm on the special ed team at the Agency of Education. 33 00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:10,020 So if there may be issues involving restraint and seclusion 34 00:02:10,020 --> 00:02:12,540 of students on IEPs 35 00:02:12,540 --> 00:02:17,540 where it may impact their IEP services, 36 00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:20,133 I can get called into that too. 37 00:02:25,552 --> 00:02:26,880 Okay, so first to just start 38 00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:29,842 with the general purposes of Rule 4500. 39 00:02:29,842 --> 00:02:31,157 So you can see on your screen,, 40 00:02:32,250 --> 00:02:35,910 the purpose is for positive and safe environments. 41 00:02:35,910 --> 00:02:40,860 We're looking to ensure that students are not subjected 42 00:02:40,860 --> 00:02:43,650 to inappropriate use of restraint and seclusion, 43 00:02:43,650 --> 00:02:45,420 and that we do emphasize the use 44 00:02:45,420 --> 00:02:48,330 of positive behavioral interventions and supports. 45 00:02:48,330 --> 00:02:53,330 Rule 4500 is for emergency situations. 46 00:02:53,460 --> 00:02:58,460 It is not intended to be for behavior modification 47 00:02:58,500 --> 00:03:00,873 or other educational purposes. 48 00:03:08,820 --> 00:03:10,670 So we'll start with some definitions. 49 00:03:12,300 --> 00:03:17,040 And this, I'm finding is really a critical definition 50 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:19,230 of seclusion because I found that there is a fair amount 51 00:03:19,230 --> 00:03:20,970 of confusion in some places 52 00:03:20,970 --> 00:03:22,833 about the definition of seclusion. 53 00:03:24,332 --> 00:03:27,210 The most significant piece to me is that first part, 54 00:03:27,210 --> 00:03:29,640 that it's the confinement of a student alone 55 00:03:29,640 --> 00:03:30,963 in a room or area. 56 00:03:33,367 --> 00:03:35,250 I've had opportunities to speak 57 00:03:35,250 --> 00:03:36,810 with a number of people in the field. 58 00:03:36,810 --> 00:03:37,830 End of the hall. 59 00:03:41,083 --> 00:03:41,916 A number of people in the field 60 00:03:41,916 --> 00:03:44,670 who have not necessarily been aware 61 00:03:44,670 --> 00:03:47,130 of that requirement that the student has to be alone 62 00:03:47,130 --> 00:03:49,650 and that they've been counting seclusion situations 63 00:03:49,650 --> 00:03:52,530 where another staff member has been in the room 64 00:03:52,530 --> 00:03:54,420 with the student, maybe processing with them 65 00:03:54,420 --> 00:03:56,220 or assisting them in some way. 66 00:03:56,220 --> 00:03:58,473 Those situations would not be seclusion. 67 00:04:00,060 --> 00:04:03,660 It also requires that the student is prevented from leaving 68 00:04:03,660 --> 00:04:06,948 or reasonably believes that they're prevented from leaving. 69 00:04:06,948 --> 00:04:08,620 And that sometimes could come up 70 00:04:09,536 --> 00:04:10,860 with a degree of subjectivity 71 00:04:10,860 --> 00:04:12,600 because we don't know necessarily 72 00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:14,580 exactly what a student believes. 73 00:04:14,580 --> 00:04:16,860 But I think we can make reasonable inferences based 74 00:04:16,860 --> 00:04:18,550 on the cues that we've given them 75 00:04:19,474 --> 00:04:22,740 and the circumstances that they're in. 76 00:04:22,740 --> 00:04:26,410 And it doesn't include timeout or private processing 77 00:04:27,510 --> 00:04:29,851 where a student isn't left alone 78 00:04:29,851 --> 00:04:32,133 or is interacting with an adult. 79 00:04:37,170 --> 00:04:39,290 All right, we're gonna be making extensive use 80 00:04:39,290 --> 00:04:41,640 of these polls during this presentation, 81 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:42,870 and these will be opportunities 82 00:04:42,870 --> 00:04:45,363 for you to respond to a variety of scenarios. 83 00:04:46,320 --> 00:04:49,740 The way that we're going to try to make these work is 84 00:04:49,740 --> 00:04:53,280 to use a cascading method to get your responses. 85 00:04:53,280 --> 00:04:56,520 These are gonna be a yes or no question at the end. 86 00:04:56,520 --> 00:05:01,380 So when we're finished looking at the scenario question 87 00:05:01,380 --> 00:05:03,720 will be whether the following scenario involves 88 00:05:03,720 --> 00:05:05,728 a use of seclusion, 89 00:05:05,728 --> 00:05:07,950 and you have an opportunity to put in the chat 90 00:05:07,950 --> 00:05:10,710 whether you think this is an incident of seclusion 91 00:05:10,710 --> 00:05:14,190 and perhaps some information about why or why not. 92 00:05:14,190 --> 00:05:15,023 But we're gonna ask 93 00:05:15,023 --> 00:05:19,143 that you not put your answer in until we cue you. 94 00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:23,403 We'll get kind of a cascade of responses at that point. 95 00:05:24,570 --> 00:05:26,160 You can type it in, 96 00:05:26,160 --> 00:05:28,774 but don't push send right until the cue to do so. 97 00:05:28,774 --> 00:05:30,633 Right. Right. 98 00:05:31,470 --> 00:05:36,470 That allows everybody to have their own private think time 99 00:05:36,660 --> 00:05:40,650 and not feel pressured when you're seeing other responses. 100 00:05:40,650 --> 00:05:44,643 So we'll give what feels like an appropriate amount of time. 101 00:05:48,420 --> 00:05:52,200 Well, I'm just, because some people may be better able 102 00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:54,360 to process this if they hear it, 103 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:56,130 I don't typically read whole slides, 104 00:05:56,130 --> 00:05:58,650 but I'll read the scenario for people. 105 00:05:58,650 --> 00:06:01,530 This is about a student named Zuri who began kicking a peer 106 00:06:01,530 --> 00:06:04,380 who was in line in front of her and wouldn't stop 107 00:06:04,380 --> 00:06:07,323 when her BI attempted to intervene and deescalate. 108 00:06:08,826 --> 00:06:11,400 The BI walked her to a quiet room and the door was closed. 109 00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:13,020 Zuri was not permitted to leave 110 00:06:13,020 --> 00:06:15,483 until she discussed the incident with her BI. 111 00:06:18,120 --> 00:06:21,420 Together, Zuri and her BI processed the situation 112 00:06:21,420 --> 00:06:23,550 and made a plan for what to do next time 113 00:06:23,550 --> 00:06:25,830 she became upset with the peer. 114 00:06:25,830 --> 00:06:28,770 So your question to answer is whether or not 115 00:06:28,770 --> 00:06:31,200 this is a use of seclusion. 116 00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:34,680 And if you wish to put in some further information 117 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:36,580 about why or why not you believe that. 118 00:06:38,062 --> 00:06:39,953 We'll give you a moment to think about it. 119 00:06:58,530 --> 00:07:00,510 All right, if you press enter for your answers, 120 00:07:00,510 --> 00:07:02,823 we'll see what people have responded. 121 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:12,953 All right. 122 00:07:22,590 --> 00:07:25,410 It's looking like the nos have it 123 00:07:25,410 --> 00:07:27,600 with a few yeses sprinkled in. 124 00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:29,703 So let's discuss this. 125 00:07:33,329 --> 00:07:34,860 Okay, so the answer, the correct answer is no, 126 00:07:34,860 --> 00:07:38,040 this does not describe an incident of seclusion. 127 00:07:38,040 --> 00:07:41,400 Zuri and her BI were together in the enclosed space, 128 00:07:41,400 --> 00:07:42,780 and she wasn't alone in the room, 129 00:07:42,780 --> 00:07:46,203 and she was able to to interact with the BI. 130 00:07:48,450 --> 00:07:51,210 Are there any other thoughts or questions about this 131 00:07:51,210 --> 00:07:52,233 before we move on? 132 00:07:53,940 --> 00:07:56,813 You can either raise your hand or put something in the chat. 133 00:07:58,331 --> 00:07:59,603 [Participant] I don't have any of those features. 134 00:08:03,830 --> 00:08:05,700 So it's not an either or. 135 00:08:05,700 --> 00:08:08,100 Both conditions are met 136 00:08:08,100 --> 00:08:12,573 in order to be considered a seclusion. 137 00:08:13,410 --> 00:08:15,480 In fact, it's best practice 138 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:19,410 in many cases to have an adult 139 00:08:19,410 --> 00:08:22,470 in a private space 140 00:08:22,470 --> 00:08:24,520 in which they can co-regulate 141 00:08:25,590 --> 00:08:29,833 and then process once the student is deescalated. 142 00:08:40,624 --> 00:08:42,840 All right, moving on. 143 00:08:42,840 --> 00:08:45,900 The next scenario, given the same situation, 144 00:08:45,900 --> 00:08:48,450 but instead of going with her BI to the quiet room, 145 00:08:48,450 --> 00:08:51,000 Zuri chose to go there herself and to cool down 146 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:53,310 before processing with the BI. 147 00:08:53,310 --> 00:08:54,600 She was allowed to do so. 148 00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:55,740 She closed the door, 149 00:08:55,740 --> 00:08:57,030 she was told to open the door 150 00:08:57,030 --> 00:08:59,370 whenever she felt ready to talk. 151 00:08:59,370 --> 00:09:00,693 Is this seclusion? 152 00:09:01,530 --> 00:09:04,860 So put your answers in chat, 153 00:09:04,860 --> 00:09:09,153 but wait for the cue to submit them. 154 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:29,223 All right, go ahead. 155 00:10:08,033 --> 00:10:10,590 Okay, it looks again as though the majority, 156 00:10:10,590 --> 00:10:13,383 if not everybody said that, no, this was not seclusion. 157 00:10:15,112 --> 00:10:16,950 Can we go to the next slide? 158 00:10:16,950 --> 00:10:19,350 No, this is not seclusion either. 159 00:10:19,350 --> 00:10:21,060 As many of you noted, 160 00:10:21,060 --> 00:10:23,070 Zuri entered the room on her own accord 161 00:10:23,070 --> 00:10:27,810 and she was able to exit when she felt ready to exit. 162 00:10:27,810 --> 00:10:29,280 So she did not, 163 00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:30,570 there was no reason for her to believe 164 00:10:30,570 --> 00:10:32,340 that she could not leave 165 00:10:32,340 --> 00:10:35,370 and it was her decision to go there in the first place. 166 00:10:35,370 --> 00:10:38,283 Any other thoughts or questions about this scenario? 167 00:10:51,240 --> 00:10:54,205 All right, next situation, (laughs) 168 00:10:54,205 --> 00:10:56,730 and we're still with Zuri and her BI. 169 00:10:56,730 --> 00:10:59,700 This time Zuri became highly aggressive toward her BI 170 00:10:59,700 --> 00:11:01,890 once they entered the quiet room together 171 00:11:01,890 --> 00:11:05,190 and didn't respond to deescalation strategies. 172 00:11:05,190 --> 00:11:06,480 Given the level of aggression 173 00:11:06,480 --> 00:11:09,060 and the failure of other less restrictive techniques, 174 00:11:09,060 --> 00:11:11,790 the BI exited the room and gave Zuri the directive 175 00:11:11,790 --> 00:11:13,050 that she was to remain there 176 00:11:13,050 --> 00:11:15,360 until she was told she could leave. 177 00:11:15,360 --> 00:11:17,190 Is this seclusion? 178 00:11:17,190 --> 00:11:21,423 Again, wait for the cue before submitting your answers. 179 00:11:22,650 --> 00:11:24,640 We'll give you about 15 seconds. 180 00:11:39,845 --> 00:11:42,012 Okay. Submit your answers. 181 00:11:59,980 --> 00:12:01,830 Okay, as the majority of you, 182 00:12:01,830 --> 00:12:03,060 if not all of you answered, 183 00:12:03,060 --> 00:12:05,760 yes, this does represent a seclusion. 184 00:12:05,760 --> 00:12:08,190 She was confined alone in the quiet room 185 00:12:08,190 --> 00:12:10,440 and had to remain until given permission to leave. 186 00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:13,083 So this very clearly was an incident of seclusion. 187 00:12:15,341 --> 00:12:16,860 And Evan had a question. 188 00:12:16,860 --> 00:12:18,870 Yep. I see another question here as well. 189 00:12:18,870 --> 00:12:21,960 So why don't we take those questions. 190 00:12:21,960 --> 00:12:25,170 So, Evan was saying 191 00:12:25,170 --> 00:12:28,950 that it sounds like the criterion 192 00:12:28,950 --> 00:12:33,000 of confinement alone supersedes the student's feeling 193 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:34,920 of not being able to leave. 194 00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:39,920 If an adult is in the room with a student and can't leave, 195 00:12:40,380 --> 00:12:43,980 that is not a seclusion because they're not alone. 196 00:12:43,980 --> 00:12:46,530 Both conditions have to be met 197 00:12:46,530 --> 00:12:49,981 in order to be considered a seclusion. 198 00:12:49,981 --> 00:12:50,814 Mm-hm. 199 00:12:54,660 --> 00:12:56,340 Was there another question? 200 00:12:56,340 --> 00:12:58,123 There was another question 201 00:12:58,123 --> 00:12:59,130 but I don't have the chat in front of me, 202 00:12:59,130 --> 00:13:00,690 but it flashes by me. 203 00:13:00,690 --> 00:13:03,690 I saw there was a question somewhere in the chat about this. 204 00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:08,883 I think that was the, oh, no. 205 00:13:11,490 --> 00:13:13,740 I think that was another participant sharing 206 00:13:13,740 --> 00:13:15,840 this similar question that Evan had. 207 00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:18,060 So that's an excellent question. 208 00:13:18,060 --> 00:13:19,890 Thanks for answering that Tracy as well. 209 00:13:19,890 --> 00:13:21,690 That's really helpful to understand. 210 00:13:22,560 --> 00:13:23,393 Yeah. 211 00:13:29,519 --> 00:13:31,325 -Okay. -One more time with Zuri. 212 00:13:31,325 --> 00:13:34,133 One more time With Zuri, poor Zuri is having a rough day. 213 00:13:36,030 --> 00:13:37,530 In this case, again, 214 00:13:37,530 --> 00:13:39,690 became highly aggressive toward her BI 215 00:13:39,690 --> 00:13:41,250 once they entered the quiet room together 216 00:13:41,250 --> 00:13:44,223 and was not responding to deescalation strategies. 217 00:13:45,210 --> 00:13:46,770 Given that level of aggression, 218 00:13:46,770 --> 00:13:49,410 the failure of other less restrictive interventions, 219 00:13:49,410 --> 00:13:52,740 the BI exited the room, but left the door open. 220 00:13:52,740 --> 00:13:54,630 Zuri was directed to remain in the room 221 00:13:54,630 --> 00:13:56,700 until she was told she could leave. 222 00:13:56,700 --> 00:13:58,603 Is this seclusion? 223 00:13:58,603 --> 00:14:01,590 And again, take time to put this in chat, 224 00:14:01,590 --> 00:14:05,823 but don't hit the response until you get the cue. 225 00:14:21,690 --> 00:14:23,613 Okay. Now you can respond. 226 00:14:42,610 --> 00:14:44,883 Okay, we're getting some mixed responses to this, 227 00:14:44,883 --> 00:14:49,110 this scenario 'cause this is a little bit more complex. 228 00:14:49,110 --> 00:14:50,720 We've moved to this slide and... 229 00:14:51,810 --> 00:14:53,973 Yeah, this is a seclusion. 230 00:14:55,380 --> 00:14:57,900 Again, Zuri was confined alone in the quiet room, 231 00:14:57,900 --> 00:15:00,930 and she had to remain there until given permission. 232 00:15:00,930 --> 00:15:03,330 Some people who said that this was not a seclusion 233 00:15:03,330 --> 00:15:05,110 were noting that the door was open 234 00:15:06,464 --> 00:15:10,423 and that Zuri was visible to the BI. 235 00:15:11,490 --> 00:15:13,500 A couple of points there, 236 00:15:13,500 --> 00:15:16,260 going back to the condition that she reasonably believed 237 00:15:16,260 --> 00:15:19,620 that she could not leave the room until she had permission. 238 00:15:19,620 --> 00:15:21,663 That's a critical element of seclusion. 239 00:15:22,500 --> 00:15:24,120 Something to keep in mind as well, 240 00:15:24,120 --> 00:15:26,010 that in any seclusion, 241 00:15:26,010 --> 00:15:28,890 the student has to be monitored continually. 242 00:15:28,890 --> 00:15:33,720 So the simply the fact that the BI had eyes on Zuri 243 00:15:33,720 --> 00:15:36,090 would be a condition we would expect regardless 244 00:15:36,090 --> 00:15:38,100 of whether it was seclusion or not, 245 00:15:38,100 --> 00:15:39,750 but especially if it were seclusion. 246 00:15:39,750 --> 00:15:43,350 So being able to see the student or having the door open 247 00:15:43,350 --> 00:15:45,960 does not remove this 248 00:15:45,960 --> 00:15:48,303 as a situation of seclusion. 249 00:15:50,367 --> 00:15:52,533 And just a point of clarification, 250 00:15:53,460 --> 00:15:54,840 even with the door shut, 251 00:15:54,840 --> 00:15:57,330 the door should have a window 252 00:15:57,330 --> 00:16:00,210 because one of the requirements is that you do need 253 00:16:00,210 --> 00:16:03,000 to have eyes on at all times. 254 00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:06,030 But being in seclusion, 255 00:16:06,030 --> 00:16:10,560 you don't even have to have a door to be in seclusion. 256 00:16:10,560 --> 00:16:15,090 In some cases there may not be a seclusion room, 257 00:16:15,090 --> 00:16:19,000 or you may be somewhere out in the community 258 00:16:20,310 --> 00:16:24,683 and you just are confining the student to a space, 259 00:16:25,740 --> 00:16:29,403 an alcove in the hallway, for an example. 260 00:16:30,780 --> 00:16:33,240 So doors are not required 261 00:16:33,240 --> 00:16:36,540 for something to be considered a seclusion. 262 00:16:36,540 --> 00:16:37,920 Yeah. 263 00:16:37,920 --> 00:16:40,890 And also the, again, emphasizing that element 264 00:16:40,890 --> 00:16:43,743 that the student reasonably believes they cannot leave. 265 00:16:44,610 --> 00:16:47,160 We've had scenarios brought to our attention where, 266 00:16:49,106 --> 00:16:50,970 say in a planning room situation, 267 00:16:50,970 --> 00:16:53,250 a single student is in a planning room, 268 00:16:53,250 --> 00:16:56,280 there is a smaller space, 269 00:16:56,280 --> 00:16:58,230 enclosed space off the planning room. 270 00:16:58,230 --> 00:17:02,610 A second student comes in to access the planning room, 271 00:17:02,610 --> 00:17:05,280 and the first student is directed into the smaller space 272 00:17:05,280 --> 00:17:07,110 and told they need to remain in there 273 00:17:07,110 --> 00:17:12,110 while the staff deals with the incoming student. 274 00:17:12,510 --> 00:17:14,343 That is a seclusion as well. 275 00:17:15,870 --> 00:17:17,700 So you really have to be careful 276 00:17:17,700 --> 00:17:19,470 about how you use these spaces 277 00:17:19,470 --> 00:17:22,290 and what sort of instructions students have. 278 00:17:22,290 --> 00:17:25,290 If you are giving them instruction 279 00:17:25,290 --> 00:17:26,673 that they are not to leave, 280 00:17:27,840 --> 00:17:31,320 then in most cases you probably are imposing a seclusion 281 00:17:31,320 --> 00:17:32,770 whether you intend to or not. 282 00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:38,880 Before we move on to physical escort, 283 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:41,760 are there any further thoughts or concerns about seclusion 284 00:17:41,760 --> 00:17:43,860 that people would like to raise right now? 285 00:17:46,620 --> 00:17:48,513 There are some questions here, 286 00:17:50,370 --> 00:17:52,890 and it gets into splitting hairs. 287 00:17:52,890 --> 00:17:56,970 I'll be the first to acknowledge that. 288 00:17:56,970 --> 00:18:00,480 So one person has asked, 289 00:18:00,480 --> 00:18:02,880 what if you're sitting in the doorway, 290 00:18:02,880 --> 00:18:04,800 the student is not trying to leave, 291 00:18:04,800 --> 00:18:07,533 but you are asking the student not to leave. 292 00:18:10,050 --> 00:18:14,470 So I would say that that is a matter of 293 00:18:16,380 --> 00:18:20,100 are you considering yourself and does the student perceive 294 00:18:20,100 --> 00:18:22,800 that you are in the room with them, 295 00:18:22,800 --> 00:18:26,313 able to co-regulate or process? 296 00:18:27,490 --> 00:18:32,490 And if that's the case, then, then no, it's not a seclusion. 297 00:18:32,820 --> 00:18:35,550 However, if you are standing, 298 00:18:35,550 --> 00:18:38,040 I think the other question is 299 00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:41,103 if I'm standing right outside of the door, 300 00:18:43,320 --> 00:18:47,400 standing on the other side of the threshold 301 00:18:47,400 --> 00:18:48,600 with the door open, 302 00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:52,020 but not physically over that threshold 303 00:18:52,020 --> 00:18:54,693 or even standing in the doorway itself, 304 00:18:55,650 --> 00:18:57,693 just giving more proximity. 305 00:18:58,710 --> 00:19:01,263 So again, I think, 306 00:19:02,940 --> 00:19:07,940 what you should be using as the criteria 307 00:19:08,760 --> 00:19:13,690 is does the student believe that you are there with them 308 00:19:14,940 --> 00:19:19,940 to process, to co-regulate, to answer questions? 309 00:19:22,350 --> 00:19:25,620 I would, yeah, 310 00:19:25,620 --> 00:19:28,680 sometimes kids need just a little bit more proximity 311 00:19:28,680 --> 00:19:32,070 because those seclusion rooms can be small 312 00:19:32,070 --> 00:19:37,070 and they may feel, you know, with two bodies in there, 313 00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:40,260 they may feel crowded. 314 00:19:40,260 --> 00:19:42,840 So if that's the case, 315 00:19:42,840 --> 00:19:44,340 and if you're making it clear 316 00:19:44,340 --> 00:19:47,370 that you're there to process with them, 317 00:19:47,370 --> 00:19:50,040 that you're gonna try some deep breathing with them, 318 00:19:50,040 --> 00:19:54,213 for example, that wouldn't be considered a seclusion. 319 00:19:55,170 --> 00:19:58,170 However, if you are, you know, 320 00:19:58,170 --> 00:20:01,950 standing there in the threshold, with your body, 321 00:20:01,950 --> 00:20:05,130 not interacting, not co-regulating 322 00:20:05,130 --> 00:20:07,530 and making it clear that your body is there 323 00:20:07,530 --> 00:20:09,693 to prevent them from leaving, 324 00:20:11,100 --> 00:20:15,993 then I would say that that would be a seclusion. 325 00:20:17,550 --> 00:20:19,560 So it can be tricky. 326 00:20:19,560 --> 00:20:22,203 A lot of times it's professional judgment. 327 00:20:25,620 --> 00:20:27,164 Yeah. 328 00:20:27,164 --> 00:20:29,039 Yeah, yeah. 329 00:20:29,039 --> 00:20:31,620 It's not always as cut and dried 330 00:20:31,620 --> 00:20:34,773 as we might like it to be given the rule. 331 00:20:36,270 --> 00:20:39,570 A lot of it does come down to your intent and purpose. 332 00:20:39,570 --> 00:20:41,730 So if you're there as essentially 333 00:20:41,730 --> 00:20:44,070 as a way of blocking the student 334 00:20:44,070 --> 00:20:45,990 and keeping them in a space, 335 00:20:45,990 --> 00:20:47,940 then that is most likely seclusion. 336 00:20:47,940 --> 00:20:51,243 If you are there to co-regulate, to help deescalate, 337 00:20:52,290 --> 00:20:53,250 then perhaps not, 338 00:20:53,250 --> 00:20:56,223 especially if you're in close proximity to the student. 339 00:20:58,530 --> 00:21:00,280 I see there's some other questions. 340 00:21:15,728 --> 00:21:18,300 It looks like there's a couple additional. 341 00:21:18,300 --> 00:21:20,580 If a deescalated student has become calm 342 00:21:20,580 --> 00:21:24,210 and asked to be alone in the room to help them calm down, 343 00:21:24,210 --> 00:21:26,703 can the adult just step outside of the room. 344 00:21:30,300 --> 00:21:33,180 If the student believes that they can leave? Sure. 345 00:21:33,180 --> 00:21:34,740 -Yep. -Yeah. 346 00:21:34,740 --> 00:21:36,378 -Yep. -In fact, 347 00:21:36,378 --> 00:21:38,940 that's a great coping mechanism 348 00:21:38,940 --> 00:21:41,553 that the student is using right then. 349 00:21:42,610 --> 00:21:43,443 -Mm-hm. -And I imagine. 350 00:21:43,443 --> 00:21:45,150 Yeah, as long as the student has control. 351 00:21:45,150 --> 00:21:46,980 Yeah, so similar to the next question, 352 00:21:46,980 --> 00:21:49,560 what if the student is asked to stay in a room 353 00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:51,813 to protect them from another student? 354 00:21:53,040 --> 00:21:56,340 So I guess if an adult is asking a student to stay in a room 355 00:21:56,340 --> 00:21:58,263 to protect them from another student. 356 00:22:00,540 --> 00:22:03,810 That's a good question that we haven't had. 357 00:22:03,810 --> 00:22:06,360 Yeah, I think it, 358 00:22:06,360 --> 00:22:07,800 that does touch on something 359 00:22:07,800 --> 00:22:10,080 that I've had some personal experience with, 360 00:22:10,080 --> 00:22:12,843 actually, that happened to a nephew of mine, sadly. 361 00:22:14,970 --> 00:22:19,050 And I can just tell you, I can share what his feeling was 362 00:22:19,050 --> 00:22:21,630 at that time was that he felt he was being secluded 363 00:22:21,630 --> 00:22:24,630 in an office and he was told he could not leave 364 00:22:24,630 --> 00:22:26,940 and it was unsafe for him to leave. 365 00:22:26,940 --> 00:22:28,560 I think, you know, 366 00:22:28,560 --> 00:22:31,050 hopefully this is an unusual circumstance, 367 00:22:31,050 --> 00:22:36,050 but if it were to happen, I think to take a moment 368 00:22:36,900 --> 00:22:39,809 to just process with the student and say, 369 00:22:39,809 --> 00:22:41,790 if this feels unsafe for you, 370 00:22:41,790 --> 00:22:43,320 there are other places you can be, 371 00:22:43,320 --> 00:22:45,153 you don't have to remain here. 372 00:22:46,417 --> 00:22:47,700 Give them some other options 373 00:22:47,700 --> 00:22:50,130 because otherwise, I think, that potentially 374 00:22:50,130 --> 00:22:52,440 would be considered seclusion 375 00:22:52,440 --> 00:22:56,670 and a violation as well because the student is not there 376 00:22:56,670 --> 00:22:59,910 because they are posing a risk of imminent harm. 377 00:22:59,910 --> 00:23:00,743 Yeah. 378 00:23:05,310 --> 00:23:09,450 Melissa asks a really good question and she asks, 379 00:23:09,450 --> 00:23:13,570 at what age do these concepts of self-control come in 380 00:23:14,452 --> 00:23:17,100 as this rule applies to three-year-old children? 381 00:23:17,100 --> 00:23:18,783 That's absolutely correct. 382 00:23:19,740 --> 00:23:21,280 And so it is 383 00:23:24,660 --> 00:23:29,250 critical that you make it really blatant to the student 384 00:23:29,250 --> 00:23:31,683 whether or not they're allowed to leave. 385 00:23:32,760 --> 00:23:35,253 And unless, 386 00:23:36,450 --> 00:23:38,010 how do I say this? 387 00:23:38,010 --> 00:23:38,843 There are 388 00:23:41,910 --> 00:23:44,280 early education centers 389 00:23:44,280 --> 00:23:47,790 that are governed solely by DCF 390 00:23:47,790 --> 00:23:52,570 and not public 391 00:23:53,880 --> 00:23:56,130 early ed centers. 392 00:23:56,130 --> 00:23:57,453 In those centers, 393 00:23:58,470 --> 00:24:00,360 I believe DCF regulations say 394 00:24:00,360 --> 00:24:03,753 that students are not allowed to be secluded. 395 00:24:06,330 --> 00:24:08,610 I'm not the early ed expert here, 396 00:24:08,610 --> 00:24:10,773 but I believe that that is the case. 397 00:24:12,630 --> 00:24:16,080 Yeah, and I will also say I'm not the early ed expert, 398 00:24:16,080 --> 00:24:18,360 but I'm aware that there is a whole other layer 399 00:24:18,360 --> 00:24:22,710 of regulation involving Agency of Human Services 400 00:24:22,710 --> 00:24:26,700 as well as Agency of Ed that that's at play here. 401 00:24:26,700 --> 00:24:28,330 And I'd recommend that you talk 402 00:24:29,237 --> 00:24:33,697 with in early ed with that expertise, questions about that. 403 00:24:35,041 --> 00:24:38,041 (people chattering) 404 00:24:44,010 --> 00:24:46,290 All right, we should probably go on 405 00:24:46,290 --> 00:24:48,273 to the next definition. 406 00:24:49,590 --> 00:24:50,423 Okay. 407 00:24:51,851 --> 00:24:54,060 And I don't, I'll confess, Tracy, 408 00:24:54,060 --> 00:24:56,280 I don't have the slide numbers in front of me here 409 00:24:56,280 --> 00:24:58,330 as I'm not sure where we had divided our. 410 00:24:59,722 --> 00:25:02,710 Oh, it's still you, unless you'd like me to take care of. 411 00:25:02,710 --> 00:25:04,343 -Okay, that's fine. -Okay. 412 00:25:06,090 --> 00:25:08,883 All right. So the next area is physical escort. 413 00:25:10,230 --> 00:25:12,045 And this is another area 414 00:25:12,045 --> 00:25:13,830 where we get frequent questions about this. 415 00:25:13,830 --> 00:25:17,823 And, again, there may be some element of subjectivity here. 416 00:25:18,750 --> 00:25:23,410 A physical escort involves momentary touching or holding 417 00:25:24,420 --> 00:25:26,280 without use of force, 418 00:25:26,280 --> 00:25:29,343 a student exhibits no or minimal resistance. 419 00:25:30,414 --> 00:25:33,180 And it's strictly for the purpose of directing movement. 420 00:25:33,180 --> 00:25:34,860 It's not considered a restraint 421 00:25:34,860 --> 00:25:37,020 if those conditions are met. 422 00:25:37,020 --> 00:25:42,020 So essentially the student still has the greatest degree 423 00:25:42,360 --> 00:25:45,000 of control over their own movement. 424 00:25:45,000 --> 00:25:48,450 And this escort may be more for the purpose 425 00:25:48,450 --> 00:25:50,460 of providing direction to the student 426 00:25:50,460 --> 00:25:54,660 of which way to move or, you know, 427 00:25:54,660 --> 00:25:57,723 kind of queuing rather than forcing the student. 428 00:26:04,890 --> 00:26:06,850 This is opposed to a moving restraint 429 00:26:08,190 --> 00:26:10,743 where there is definite use of physical force. 430 00:26:12,626 --> 00:26:16,560 It's more than a minimal touch or a cue. 431 00:26:16,560 --> 00:26:19,170 It involves restriction of the students moving. 432 00:26:19,170 --> 00:26:22,440 And in my mind, one of the most important pieces 433 00:26:22,440 --> 00:26:24,270 is that the student is actively resisting, 434 00:26:24,270 --> 00:26:26,070 that the student does not, 435 00:26:26,070 --> 00:26:29,970 is not choosing to move in the way 436 00:26:29,970 --> 00:26:33,150 or in the direction that staff are indicating. 437 00:26:33,150 --> 00:26:34,770 And that this would be a restraint 438 00:26:34,770 --> 00:26:36,693 that's governed by Rule 4500. 439 00:26:37,560 --> 00:26:40,830 And if this is being used, 440 00:26:40,830 --> 00:26:43,080 then it has to be used according to the protocols 441 00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:45,150 of the restraint training program 442 00:26:45,150 --> 00:26:47,313 that your school or district has adopted. 443 00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:54,060 And here we have a side by side that illustrates some 444 00:26:54,060 --> 00:26:57,003 of the differences between escort and moving restraint. 445 00:26:57,840 --> 00:27:00,070 And I, you know, I will acknowledge that 446 00:27:03,180 --> 00:27:05,763 there's room for some gray area between the two. 447 00:27:06,660 --> 00:27:09,070 There's a certain amount of question 448 00:27:12,061 --> 00:27:14,670 of intent or understanding on the part of the student. 449 00:27:14,670 --> 00:27:18,690 You know, when we talk about momentary 450 00:27:18,690 --> 00:27:20,790 or temporary physical contact, 451 00:27:20,790 --> 00:27:24,328 we don't, I've had people ask me how many seconds? 452 00:27:24,328 --> 00:27:27,783 And we don't have rules that specify that sort of thing. 453 00:27:30,060 --> 00:27:32,910 To some extent you may need 454 00:27:32,910 --> 00:27:35,730 to apply some interpretation here in terms 455 00:27:35,730 --> 00:27:37,890 of what you're doing with this student. 456 00:27:37,890 --> 00:27:39,690 I think in most cases, 457 00:27:39,690 --> 00:27:43,410 generally the vast majority of cases, it's pretty clear. 458 00:27:43,410 --> 00:27:45,570 But there certainly are going to be circumstances 459 00:27:45,570 --> 00:27:47,610 where maybe it's not crystal clear 460 00:27:47,610 --> 00:27:50,610 as to whether this is an escort or a moving restraint. 461 00:27:50,610 --> 00:27:52,710 And it also is quite possible 462 00:27:52,710 --> 00:27:55,593 that an escort could become a moving restraint. 463 00:27:58,380 --> 00:28:00,660 And I wanted to add 464 00:28:00,660 --> 00:28:03,630 that there are some semantics involved here. 465 00:28:03,630 --> 00:28:07,260 There are some restraint training programs 466 00:28:07,260 --> 00:28:09,430 that use the term escort 467 00:28:13,050 --> 00:28:15,900 and what it means is it's a moving restraint. 468 00:28:15,900 --> 00:28:18,840 So for example, if you are using a technique 469 00:28:18,840 --> 00:28:23,190 where two staff members lock 470 00:28:23,190 --> 00:28:25,560 each of the students' arms 471 00:28:25,560 --> 00:28:27,270 and they walk with them, 472 00:28:27,270 --> 00:28:30,204 that would be considered a moving restraint, 473 00:28:30,204 --> 00:28:34,203 even though your program calls that an escort. 474 00:28:36,060 --> 00:28:39,000 And the other thing I wanted to mention 475 00:28:39,000 --> 00:28:42,930 is that some training programs do not allow moving escorts. 476 00:28:42,930 --> 00:28:44,130 They are dangerous, 477 00:28:44,130 --> 00:28:49,130 it is dangerous to be moving an actively resisting student. 478 00:28:49,320 --> 00:28:53,250 So I would suggest that if you need to do that, 479 00:28:53,250 --> 00:28:55,650 you do it really momentarily, 480 00:28:55,650 --> 00:28:59,820 just enough time to get the student to a safer place 481 00:28:59,820 --> 00:29:04,323 or to a more private space to preserve their dignity. 482 00:29:05,817 --> 00:29:10,817 And then you make it a stationary restraint. 483 00:29:11,818 --> 00:29:14,735 (audio stuttering) 484 00:29:15,757 --> 00:29:17,050 Oh, that's weird. 485 00:29:17,050 --> 00:29:19,470 Yeah, I think somebody may have unmuted for a moment. 486 00:29:19,470 --> 00:29:22,470 Yeah, I'm just gonna reiterate what Tracy said 487 00:29:22,470 --> 00:29:24,240 because I think this is important, 488 00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:25,900 that moving restraints are 489 00:29:27,840 --> 00:29:30,295 one of the more risky or dangerous, 490 00:29:30,295 --> 00:29:33,090 potentially dangerous activities that could take place. 491 00:29:33,090 --> 00:29:34,620 And if there are alternatives 492 00:29:34,620 --> 00:29:36,780 to implementing a moving restraint, 493 00:29:36,780 --> 00:29:38,910 you certainly should consider those. 494 00:29:38,910 --> 00:29:41,880 Also, knowing just Vermont schools 495 00:29:41,880 --> 00:29:44,280 and the age of many of our buildings, 496 00:29:44,280 --> 00:29:48,120 a moving restraint may involve encountering stairways 497 00:29:48,120 --> 00:29:50,760 and moving restraint with stairways 498 00:29:50,760 --> 00:29:53,880 is an especially dangerous maneuver. 499 00:29:53,880 --> 00:29:56,253 Very dangerous, yes. 500 00:29:58,260 --> 00:30:00,400 And there's a question 501 00:30:01,357 --> 00:30:05,091 about what if the student lifts their legs up 502 00:30:05,091 --> 00:30:08,553 while you're escorting them. 503 00:30:10,230 --> 00:30:14,440 This person has been advised to release them 504 00:30:15,390 --> 00:30:19,173 or to put a hold on the student, and that is correct. 505 00:30:20,400 --> 00:30:25,230 There are no approved restraint training programs 506 00:30:25,230 --> 00:30:28,230 that allow a child to be carried. 507 00:30:28,230 --> 00:30:32,880 So you have to be using a hold or an escort 508 00:30:32,880 --> 00:30:35,013 that you have been trained to use. 509 00:30:38,160 --> 00:30:42,300 Oh, someone, I'm sorry. 510 00:30:42,300 --> 00:30:45,960 When it says just an initial and then a last name, 511 00:30:45,960 --> 00:30:47,463 I don't know what to call you. 512 00:30:48,917 --> 00:30:53,917 So Ms. Foster or Mister, Megan says that Handle with Care 513 00:30:54,060 --> 00:30:57,213 does allow you to lift the student. 514 00:30:58,050 --> 00:30:59,970 I was not aware of that. 515 00:30:59,970 --> 00:31:03,423 So that's something for me to check in on. 516 00:31:04,260 --> 00:31:06,540 Thanks for raising that, Megan. 517 00:31:06,540 --> 00:31:09,632 Yeah, there may be some elements 518 00:31:09,632 --> 00:31:11,940 of Handle with Care that are not part 519 00:31:11,940 --> 00:31:13,170 of the Vermont approval. 520 00:31:13,170 --> 00:31:16,380 I'm not speaking out of great knowledge right now, 521 00:31:16,380 --> 00:31:19,241 but I think there have been some questions 522 00:31:19,241 --> 00:31:21,990 about the entire Handle with Care process 523 00:31:21,990 --> 00:31:24,090 as opposed to elements of Handle with Care 524 00:31:24,090 --> 00:31:26,190 that are approved for Vermont. 525 00:31:26,190 --> 00:31:27,990 I could be mistaken about that, 526 00:31:27,990 --> 00:31:29,943 but I believe that has been an issue. 527 00:31:31,680 --> 00:31:33,257 So that's something 528 00:31:33,257 --> 00:31:34,110 that we're gonna have to do some research on 529 00:31:34,110 --> 00:31:36,870 and we will get back to you, Megan, 530 00:31:36,870 --> 00:31:41,340 and anyone else that wants guidance on that. 531 00:31:41,340 --> 00:31:42,640 -Yeah. -We can do that. 532 00:31:44,790 --> 00:31:46,653 Meanwhile, we have another poll. 533 00:31:47,550 --> 00:31:49,980 So the question is whether the following incident involves 534 00:31:49,980 --> 00:31:52,560 an escort or a moving restraint 535 00:31:52,560 --> 00:31:57,560 and an opportunity to state why or why you think not. 536 00:31:57,810 --> 00:32:00,780 So Ben was asked to step into the hallway 537 00:32:00,780 --> 00:32:03,000 to discuss a matter with the classroom assistant. 538 00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:05,490 He refused and crawled under his desk. 539 00:32:05,490 --> 00:32:07,320 The assistant was able to coax Ben out 540 00:32:07,320 --> 00:32:08,280 from beneath the desk, 541 00:32:08,280 --> 00:32:10,440 but Ben refused to leave the classroom, 542 00:32:10,440 --> 00:32:13,590 told the assistant he was going to stay where he was. 543 00:32:13,590 --> 00:32:15,930 The assistant placed an arm across Ben's shoulders 544 00:32:15,930 --> 00:32:17,430 and engaged him in conversation 545 00:32:17,430 --> 00:32:19,230 while slowly moving toward the door. 546 00:32:19,230 --> 00:32:24,230 Ben grumbled, but, the check gets in the way, complained, 547 00:32:24,360 --> 00:32:26,940 but slowly moved along with the assistant. 548 00:32:26,940 --> 00:32:29,490 So again, don't submit your answer 549 00:32:29,490 --> 00:32:30,810 until you're given the cue, 550 00:32:30,810 --> 00:32:33,690 but the question is whether this was an escort 551 00:32:33,690 --> 00:32:34,863 or moving restraint. 552 00:32:51,070 --> 00:32:52,863 Okay, you can enter your answers. 553 00:33:04,770 --> 00:33:07,863 Looks like we have 100% agreement on this one. 554 00:33:13,020 --> 00:33:14,376 Yeah. 555 00:33:14,376 --> 00:33:17,580 And as everyone or virtually everybody has responded, 556 00:33:17,580 --> 00:33:20,130 yeah, this was an escort, not a moving restraint. 557 00:33:20,130 --> 00:33:23,970 There was minimal force, the student resisted verbally, 558 00:33:23,970 --> 00:33:25,770 but not physically. 559 00:33:25,770 --> 00:33:28,500 And so as such, it was not something 560 00:33:28,500 --> 00:33:30,723 that needs to be re reported as a restraint. 561 00:33:39,300 --> 00:33:40,500 Okay. 562 00:33:40,500 --> 00:33:42,480 We have some more definitions here 563 00:33:42,480 --> 00:33:44,780 about some of the types of physical restraint. 564 00:33:47,130 --> 00:33:48,510 So first of all, in general, 565 00:33:48,510 --> 00:33:51,510 physical restraint is the use of physical force 566 00:33:51,510 --> 00:33:53,970 to prevent an imminent and substantial risk 567 00:33:53,970 --> 00:33:56,733 of bodily harm to the student or others. 568 00:34:00,810 --> 00:34:02,950 So this obviously does not define 569 00:34:03,900 --> 00:34:05,970 how you implement a physical restraint. 570 00:34:05,970 --> 00:34:08,220 This talks about the purpose for physical restraint. 571 00:34:08,220 --> 00:34:09,960 And it's important, I'll read that again, 572 00:34:09,960 --> 00:34:12,750 that it's to prevent an imminent and substantial risk 573 00:34:12,750 --> 00:34:15,273 of bodily harm to the student or others. 574 00:34:18,270 --> 00:34:20,850 There are two types of physical restraint 575 00:34:20,850 --> 00:34:25,850 that we are hoping to, 576 00:34:26,610 --> 00:34:28,473 that would rarely be implemented. 577 00:34:30,480 --> 00:34:32,250 Those are the prone restraint and the supine restraint. 578 00:34:32,250 --> 00:34:36,150 Prone is where student is face down on their stomach. 579 00:34:36,150 --> 00:34:38,883 Supine is where the student is held on their back. 580 00:34:44,580 --> 00:34:47,970 These are prohibited except when the student's size 581 00:34:47,970 --> 00:34:50,220 or the severity of the behavior require it 582 00:34:50,220 --> 00:34:52,350 because the less restrictive restraint has failed 583 00:34:52,350 --> 00:34:53,733 or would be ineffective. 584 00:34:57,150 --> 00:34:59,790 The reason for that is not only are they more restrictive, 585 00:34:59,790 --> 00:35:00,900 they're more dangerous. 586 00:35:00,900 --> 00:35:03,300 These are restraints where there's some risk of interfering 587 00:35:03,300 --> 00:35:05,373 with the students' breathing, 588 00:35:06,540 --> 00:35:09,243 where other types of injury become more possible. 589 00:35:11,220 --> 00:35:15,480 There are a number of states in the US 590 00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:18,870 that have outright restricted these altogether, 591 00:35:18,870 --> 00:35:20,193 that do not permit these. 592 00:35:21,030 --> 00:35:23,063 Vermont does permit them. 593 00:35:23,063 --> 00:35:26,640 But the rule is very clear that these are only to be used 594 00:35:26,640 --> 00:35:29,250 in what we would hopefully feel 595 00:35:29,250 --> 00:35:31,170 are extraordinary circumstances 596 00:35:31,170 --> 00:35:32,820 where there are no other options. 597 00:35:35,970 --> 00:35:37,770 So another poll. 598 00:35:37,770 --> 00:35:40,430 Question of whether this incident represents restraint 599 00:35:40,430 --> 00:35:41,823 or why or why not. 600 00:35:43,890 --> 00:35:46,260 So we're back to Ben. 601 00:35:46,260 --> 00:35:48,540 This time, Ben pulled the assistant's hair 602 00:35:48,540 --> 00:35:51,393 and used his knee to strike the assistant's jaw. 603 00:35:52,230 --> 00:35:53,280 As the assistant was able 604 00:35:53,280 --> 00:35:56,070 to unclench Ben's fist from his hair, 605 00:35:56,070 --> 00:35:59,730 and with her hands beneath the forearms, 606 00:35:59,730 --> 00:36:01,830 she guided into a standing position. 607 00:36:01,830 --> 00:36:03,692 She spoke quietly 608 00:36:03,692 --> 00:36:06,930 and used verbal deescalation techniques to calm Ben. 609 00:36:06,930 --> 00:36:09,240 Ben continued to reach toward the assistant's hair, 610 00:36:09,240 --> 00:36:10,470 kicked at her shins. 611 00:36:10,470 --> 00:36:13,200 And at this point the assistant used an approved maneuver 612 00:36:13,200 --> 00:36:15,720 that involved wrapping Ben's upper arm with hers 613 00:36:15,720 --> 00:36:18,180 and attempted to guide him toward the door. 614 00:36:18,180 --> 00:36:20,010 Ben attempted to dig his heels in, 615 00:36:20,010 --> 00:36:21,480 but due to his small size, 616 00:36:21,480 --> 00:36:23,940 the assistant was able to move him toward the doorway 617 00:36:23,940 --> 00:36:25,623 in spite of Ben's opposition. 618 00:36:26,460 --> 00:36:28,290 So we're gonna take about 15 seconds 619 00:36:28,290 --> 00:36:30,810 for you to respond and chat 620 00:36:30,810 --> 00:36:33,900 as to whether or not you think this represents a restraint. 621 00:36:33,900 --> 00:36:36,003 And then we'll review the answers. 622 00:36:52,140 --> 00:36:53,640 All right, enter your answers. 623 00:37:27,030 --> 00:37:28,127 Great. 624 00:37:28,127 --> 00:37:31,590 And as it seems from the answers I've seen, 625 00:37:31,590 --> 00:37:33,450 people correctly were responding 626 00:37:33,450 --> 00:37:36,420 this was in fact a moving restraint. 627 00:37:36,420 --> 00:37:38,550 It required more than minimal force, 628 00:37:38,550 --> 00:37:40,173 Ben was actively resisting. 629 00:37:43,200 --> 00:37:46,600 And as such it had to be reported as a restraint 630 00:37:47,782 --> 00:37:50,493 and as governed by the 4500 rules. 631 00:37:51,690 --> 00:37:56,690 A question in my own mind when I was reading the scenario is 632 00:37:56,790 --> 00:38:01,790 I wondered was it necessary for the assistant 633 00:38:01,860 --> 00:38:05,793 to apply a moving restraint. 634 00:38:07,890 --> 00:38:11,970 And not having been there not knowing what the scenario is, 635 00:38:11,970 --> 00:38:13,680 it wouldn't be for me to judge, 636 00:38:13,680 --> 00:38:15,180 but it would be a question I'd have 637 00:38:15,180 --> 00:38:16,530 if this were reported to me 638 00:38:16,530 --> 00:38:19,530 about was it necessary to remove Ben from the classroom 639 00:38:19,530 --> 00:38:21,990 and implement a somewhat more risky moving restraint? 640 00:38:21,990 --> 00:38:25,020 Or could could there have been a restraint that took place 641 00:38:25,020 --> 00:38:30,020 there in the classroom and pose somewhat less risk for Ben? 642 00:38:30,210 --> 00:38:32,130 Just a personal question. 643 00:38:32,130 --> 00:38:33,420 Are there other thoughts or questions 644 00:38:33,420 --> 00:38:34,770 that people had about this? 645 00:38:53,250 --> 00:38:56,830 There is a somewhat unrelated question here 646 00:38:58,710 --> 00:39:03,710 that asks if a medical professional prescribes a restraint 647 00:39:06,480 --> 00:39:09,780 that it doesn't fall under 4,500 648 00:39:09,780 --> 00:39:11,973 and doesn't need to be reported. 649 00:39:13,770 --> 00:39:18,300 So the answer to that question is a little tricky. 650 00:39:18,300 --> 00:39:23,300 It depends on what type of restraint is being prescribed 651 00:39:24,540 --> 00:39:27,540 and for what reason. 652 00:39:27,540 --> 00:39:31,740 If a medical professional is prescribing, 653 00:39:31,740 --> 00:39:36,740 I'll just use a very exaggerated sort of thing, 654 00:39:38,640 --> 00:39:42,010 like if a medical professional says 655 00:39:43,254 --> 00:39:46,800 that a student in a wheelchair needs to be harnessed in 656 00:39:46,800 --> 00:39:51,800 using more than just the seatbelt on the wheelchair, 657 00:39:51,900 --> 00:39:55,173 and that is for positional, 658 00:39:57,710 --> 00:40:00,270 bodily mechanics, having the students sit straight up 659 00:40:00,270 --> 00:40:02,430 and not slump over. 660 00:40:02,430 --> 00:40:07,140 If that's the case, and if that particular harness 661 00:40:07,140 --> 00:40:11,220 is designed to be used for that reason, 662 00:40:11,220 --> 00:40:15,531 then that would not be considered a restraint. 663 00:40:15,531 --> 00:40:18,570 It is a mechanical restraint, 664 00:40:18,570 --> 00:40:23,570 but because it was prescribed by the physician 665 00:40:23,610 --> 00:40:28,320 and it was and the particular harness 666 00:40:28,320 --> 00:40:31,590 was meant to be used for that reason 667 00:40:31,590 --> 00:40:35,100 and the school nurse has trained everyone 668 00:40:35,100 --> 00:40:39,060 in how to make sure that that harness is in place, 669 00:40:39,060 --> 00:40:43,290 then that does not count as a seclusion 670 00:40:43,290 --> 00:40:46,500 and doesn't need to be reported. 671 00:40:46,500 --> 00:40:51,243 However, there are some doctors who may prescribe that, 672 00:40:53,790 --> 00:40:56,979 for example, I think we had an instance 673 00:40:56,979 --> 00:41:01,770 where a physician prescribed some sort of device 674 00:41:01,770 --> 00:41:04,740 where it would lock the student's arm 675 00:41:04,740 --> 00:41:07,680 so that the student couldn't bend their arm 676 00:41:07,680 --> 00:41:10,530 because the student had self-injurious behaviors 677 00:41:10,530 --> 00:41:12,873 that involved biting their arm. 678 00:41:14,820 --> 00:41:18,030 That would be something that should be involved, 679 00:41:18,030 --> 00:41:22,050 should be included in a student's health plan, 680 00:41:22,050 --> 00:41:25,390 and the school nurse should be the one 681 00:41:28,152 --> 00:41:29,793 that is in charge of that. 682 00:41:33,300 --> 00:41:36,513 It just feels to me like that is, 683 00:41:39,690 --> 00:41:41,520 there's room for interpretation, 684 00:41:41,520 --> 00:41:44,520 but to me it feels like 685 00:41:44,520 --> 00:41:48,240 if you are only putting that device on 686 00:41:48,240 --> 00:41:51,750 when the student is acting up, 687 00:41:51,750 --> 00:41:55,740 that would require a high level of training 688 00:41:55,740 --> 00:42:00,150 on how to get that brace on. 689 00:42:00,150 --> 00:42:03,720 And it seems like it could be dangerous doing that 690 00:42:03,720 --> 00:42:06,990 to a child that's actively resisting. 691 00:42:06,990 --> 00:42:10,473 So the nurse would need to really guide that. 692 00:42:11,640 --> 00:42:14,073 I would not recommend it. 693 00:42:15,870 --> 00:42:18,600 I'm sure there are lots of other examples 694 00:42:18,600 --> 00:42:21,130 and they probably would be worth 695 00:42:22,890 --> 00:42:26,310 just calling Tom or I and discussing it. 696 00:42:26,310 --> 00:42:29,790 And I'm sorry that you didn't get an answer 697 00:42:29,790 --> 00:42:31,713 when you asked that previously. 698 00:42:32,880 --> 00:42:35,790 Just make sure you direct that to... 699 00:42:35,790 --> 00:42:36,930 Oh, go ahead. 700 00:42:36,930 --> 00:42:39,180 Yeah, this sort of situation actually has come up 701 00:42:39,180 --> 00:42:42,570 a few times recently, people contacting me. 702 00:42:42,570 --> 00:42:44,280 And again, it typically involves 703 00:42:44,280 --> 00:42:46,630 what would be considered mechanical restraints. 704 00:42:47,670 --> 00:42:51,573 And the question has a couple of times lately been about, 705 00:42:52,500 --> 00:42:57,480 I think five point restraints on a school bus for a student 706 00:42:57,480 --> 00:43:00,600 and whether that would be considered a restraint. 707 00:43:00,600 --> 00:43:05,600 And my answer to that is it depends. 708 00:43:05,730 --> 00:43:08,580 If this is something that has to be used 709 00:43:08,580 --> 00:43:10,890 because a student is physically incapable 710 00:43:10,890 --> 00:43:13,740 of supporting themselves in the seat 711 00:43:13,740 --> 00:43:17,760 and needs that in order to be able to remain seated, 712 00:43:17,760 --> 00:43:19,590 but because they have a physical condition 713 00:43:19,590 --> 00:43:22,890 that prevents them from safely sitting in the seat, 714 00:43:22,890 --> 00:43:25,800 then that's probably a medical appliance 715 00:43:25,800 --> 00:43:29,250 and wouldn't be considered a mechanical restraint. 716 00:43:29,250 --> 00:43:32,850 If it's being used to control the student's behavior though, 717 00:43:32,850 --> 00:43:35,910 if this is a student who may be interacting with others 718 00:43:35,910 --> 00:43:38,490 or may be engaging in self-injurious behavior 719 00:43:38,490 --> 00:43:41,940 and the belts are used to prevent that, 720 00:43:41,940 --> 00:43:45,180 then that would be a mechanical restraint. 721 00:43:45,180 --> 00:43:49,413 So purpose sometimes is also a factor. 722 00:43:57,540 --> 00:44:01,950 All right, and this perhaps the question was anticipating 723 00:44:01,950 --> 00:44:02,790 this next slide, 724 00:44:02,790 --> 00:44:05,610 which does reference that physical restraints 725 00:44:05,610 --> 00:44:08,790 do not include the bottom techniques prescribed 726 00:44:08,790 --> 00:44:11,973 by qualified medical professional. 727 00:44:14,730 --> 00:44:17,760 Momentary periods of physical restriction accomplished 728 00:44:17,760 --> 00:44:21,720 with limited force, minimum contact, 729 00:44:21,720 --> 00:44:24,060 and hand-over-hand assistance with a task. 730 00:44:24,060 --> 00:44:26,940 And there's a variety of things that are included here. 731 00:44:26,940 --> 00:44:29,520 I can tell you from my experience 732 00:44:29,520 --> 00:44:31,320 in responding to questions about this, 733 00:44:31,320 --> 00:44:34,980 the first one probably is the most frequent question 734 00:44:34,980 --> 00:44:37,530 that comes my way is that there's a situation 735 00:44:37,530 --> 00:44:41,520 where a student maybe initiates a movement 736 00:44:41,520 --> 00:44:43,240 to strike someone else 737 00:44:44,580 --> 00:44:49,437 and a staff member puts up a hand and blocks that 738 00:44:49,437 --> 00:44:51,720 and was that a restraint? 739 00:44:51,720 --> 00:44:53,910 And the answer to that most likely would be no. 740 00:44:53,910 --> 00:44:55,500 Again, you want to hear the details, 741 00:44:55,500 --> 00:44:58,380 you can't give a blanket answer to any situation, 742 00:44:58,380 --> 00:45:02,200 but that momentary physical restriction with limited force 743 00:45:03,984 --> 00:45:07,083 is usually not gonna be considered a restraint. 744 00:45:08,760 --> 00:45:11,400 Hand-over-hand assistance with a task. 745 00:45:11,400 --> 00:45:13,530 To me, that that in my mind, 746 00:45:13,530 --> 00:45:18,390 that goes back to work I did many years ago with students 747 00:45:18,390 --> 00:45:22,050 who had to learn some basic living skills 748 00:45:22,050 --> 00:45:24,660 such as toothbrushing or feeding themselves 749 00:45:24,660 --> 00:45:27,870 that required hand-over-hand support 750 00:45:27,870 --> 00:45:32,310 in order to learn the mechanics of some of the tasks. 751 00:45:32,310 --> 00:45:34,170 That's not considered a restraint, 752 00:45:34,170 --> 00:45:36,363 that that can be a teaching method. 753 00:45:37,999 --> 00:45:39,030 And then obviously we've just talked 754 00:45:39,030 --> 00:45:44,030 about some of the mechanical restraints 755 00:45:44,610 --> 00:45:46,923 that are prescribed by medical professional, 756 00:45:47,910 --> 00:45:49,950 techniques might also be more 757 00:45:49,950 --> 00:45:52,713 in the lines of physical therapy, for instance. 758 00:45:53,610 --> 00:45:56,623 There might be some situations where, you know, 759 00:45:56,623 --> 00:45:59,520 a student may not be particularly happy 760 00:45:59,520 --> 00:46:02,460 about engaging in some physical therapy, 761 00:46:02,460 --> 00:46:06,210 but it is necessary for their physical wellbeing. 762 00:46:06,210 --> 00:46:08,490 And it is prescribed by a professional 763 00:46:08,490 --> 00:46:10,710 and typically implemented by somebody 764 00:46:10,710 --> 00:46:13,160 with very specific training in implementing that. 765 00:46:18,540 --> 00:46:19,983 All right, another poll. 766 00:46:21,240 --> 00:46:24,570 Does this incident represent an acceptable use of restraint? 767 00:46:24,570 --> 00:46:26,580 Why or why not? 768 00:46:26,580 --> 00:46:27,420 So in this case, 769 00:46:27,420 --> 00:46:30,732 Kara is a fourth grade student with disabilities, 770 00:46:30,732 --> 00:46:33,300 has previously used a wheelchair for mobility reasons. 771 00:46:33,300 --> 00:46:34,260 Over the past year, 772 00:46:34,260 --> 00:46:36,870 she's made significant progress in physical therapy 773 00:46:36,870 --> 00:46:38,850 and is able to move without the use of the chair 774 00:46:38,850 --> 00:46:40,530 most of the time. 775 00:46:40,530 --> 00:46:42,900 Her chair is still available in case of emergencies, 776 00:46:42,900 --> 00:46:45,390 such as a building evacuation 777 00:46:45,390 --> 00:46:49,233 so that she could be assisted to exit quickly if need be. 778 00:46:50,100 --> 00:46:52,770 Recently, Kara's BI has been using the wheelchair 779 00:46:52,770 --> 00:46:56,040 to keep Kara contained when she became dysregulated. 780 00:46:56,040 --> 00:46:57,840 Sometimes Kara will yell loudly, 781 00:46:57,840 --> 00:46:59,400 throw herself onto the floor, 782 00:46:59,400 --> 00:47:01,770 or throw books in the BI's face. 783 00:47:01,770 --> 00:47:04,410 So the BI will strap her in the wheelchair. 784 00:47:04,410 --> 00:47:05,820 Often just the suggestion 785 00:47:05,820 --> 00:47:07,350 that Kara will need to go to the chair 786 00:47:07,350 --> 00:47:10,290 helps her BI deescalate her behavior. 787 00:47:10,290 --> 00:47:15,290 So 15 seconds again, is this an acceptable use of restraint? 788 00:47:30,760 --> 00:47:32,253 Okay, respond please. 789 00:48:09,440 --> 00:48:10,288 All right. 790 00:48:10,288 --> 00:48:12,330 It appears that the majority of responses are that no, 791 00:48:12,330 --> 00:48:13,500 this is not acceptable. 792 00:48:13,500 --> 00:48:14,793 This is not permissible. 793 00:48:16,989 --> 00:48:18,180 I'll go to the answer. 794 00:48:18,180 --> 00:48:20,310 Yeah, this is not acceptable. 795 00:48:20,310 --> 00:48:23,433 It's clearly a mechanical restraint and it's not permitted. 796 00:48:24,270 --> 00:48:26,700 Kara doesn't need the wheelchair. 797 00:48:26,700 --> 00:48:29,790 So it's not a prescribed or authorized device. 798 00:48:29,790 --> 00:48:32,390 The straps are being used as a mechanical restraint. 799 00:48:33,840 --> 00:48:37,140 Even if she's presenting a risk of imminent physical harm, 800 00:48:37,140 --> 00:48:42,130 this is not a restraint that would be permitted and 801 00:48:45,390 --> 00:48:49,030 that the BI should be looking at other types of intervention 802 00:48:49,920 --> 00:48:52,083 instead of strapping Kara into the chair. 803 00:48:58,440 --> 00:49:02,673 Okay, I'm gonna take over for a period of time now, 804 00:49:03,510 --> 00:49:06,300 and we are going to 805 00:49:06,300 --> 00:49:11,300 really dissect these terms of substantial risk 806 00:49:12,570 --> 00:49:17,043 and imminent harm and significant bodily harm. 807 00:49:19,500 --> 00:49:21,720 Just so we're really clear, 808 00:49:21,720 --> 00:49:26,720 the only reasons that you can use a seclusion or restraint 809 00:49:27,000 --> 00:49:31,680 are when a student is posing 810 00:49:31,680 --> 00:49:36,300 an imminent risk of substantial harm 811 00:49:36,300 --> 00:49:39,060 or significant bodily harm. 812 00:49:39,060 --> 00:49:42,300 These are emergency interventions only. 813 00:49:42,300 --> 00:49:46,293 They're not to be used in any sort of planned way. 814 00:49:47,370 --> 00:49:49,890 They're only a last resort 815 00:49:49,890 --> 00:49:53,400 when there is a substantial risk of harm. 816 00:49:53,400 --> 00:49:58,400 So let's dissect these terms. 817 00:49:58,860 --> 00:50:03,860 Imminent means that the child's behavior is 818 00:50:04,230 --> 00:50:09,230 or will be immediate or it could occur at any time. 819 00:50:09,900 --> 00:50:12,030 So it's right there in your face, 820 00:50:12,030 --> 00:50:16,530 it is happening or it's about to happen. 821 00:50:16,530 --> 00:50:20,700 The students gotta chair above their head 822 00:50:20,700 --> 00:50:22,983 and they're getting ready to throw it. 823 00:50:24,270 --> 00:50:26,760 It means the child has the ability 824 00:50:26,760 --> 00:50:29,910 or the means to enact a physical injury 825 00:50:29,910 --> 00:50:32,430 or bodily harm through their behavior. 826 00:50:32,430 --> 00:50:37,050 So if I am threatening to throw a chair 827 00:50:37,050 --> 00:50:39,510 or if I don't have a chair, 828 00:50:39,510 --> 00:50:42,480 but instead I'm going like this, 829 00:50:42,480 --> 00:50:47,480 well, I don't really have the means to do that right now. 830 00:50:49,080 --> 00:50:53,160 And even after adults have provided lessons, 831 00:50:53,160 --> 00:50:57,510 less restrictive interventions to deescalate the behavior, 832 00:50:57,510 --> 00:51:01,133 the child's behavior persists. 833 00:51:01,133 --> 00:51:05,490 So that all those things combined equal imminent, 834 00:51:05,490 --> 00:51:07,890 it's right there, it is about to happen. 835 00:51:07,890 --> 00:51:12,890 The student has the means and the intent to enact that harm. 836 00:51:14,580 --> 00:51:16,710 The next definition 837 00:51:16,710 --> 00:51:20,463 that we're gonna talk about is significant bodily harm. 838 00:51:21,840 --> 00:51:24,450 Here the bar is set really high. 839 00:51:24,450 --> 00:51:28,860 The standard is high for what you, 840 00:51:28,860 --> 00:51:32,340 what type of harm the student's behavior must pose 841 00:51:32,340 --> 00:51:35,910 in order to allow 842 00:51:35,910 --> 00:51:37,740 a restraint or seclusion. 843 00:51:37,740 --> 00:51:41,820 So significant bodily harm means that it's severe enough 844 00:51:41,820 --> 00:51:43,800 to cause a cut, an abrasion, 845 00:51:43,800 --> 00:51:46,980 a bruise, burn or disfigurement. 846 00:51:46,980 --> 00:51:50,590 It's severe enough to cause physical pain or illness 847 00:51:51,571 --> 00:51:55,290 or significant enough 848 00:51:55,290 --> 00:51:57,090 to impair the function 849 00:51:57,090 --> 00:52:00,753 of a bodily member organ or mental faculty. 850 00:52:02,070 --> 00:52:06,120 So we're gonna do some polls around this 851 00:52:06,120 --> 00:52:09,480 and I'm going to describe Chloe, 852 00:52:09,480 --> 00:52:12,543 who is a high school junior rugby player, 853 00:52:13,560 --> 00:52:16,260 and she is angry with the score 854 00:52:16,260 --> 00:52:21,030 that she received on a quiz and lashed out at her teacher. 855 00:52:21,030 --> 00:52:25,710 She loudly provided very specific threats to the teacher, 856 00:52:25,710 --> 00:52:29,880 such as, I'm gonna slash your throat with a 10-inch blade 857 00:52:29,880 --> 00:52:33,993 and I'm gonna run your baby over with my boyfriend's car. 858 00:52:36,829 --> 00:52:37,920 (sneezes) Excuse me. 859 00:52:37,920 --> 00:52:40,320 At first, the teacher praised the other students 860 00:52:40,320 --> 00:52:44,370 who are sitting quietly and planfully ignored Chloe. 861 00:52:44,370 --> 00:52:46,110 When Chloe continued, 862 00:52:46,110 --> 00:52:49,200 the teacher positioned herself at a safe distance, 863 00:52:49,200 --> 00:52:51,060 but closer to Chloe's desk, 864 00:52:51,060 --> 00:52:54,090 speaking softly and quietly prompting her 865 00:52:54,090 --> 00:52:57,270 to use one of her anger management skills 866 00:52:57,270 --> 00:53:00,145 and giving her the choice to take a break 867 00:53:00,145 --> 00:53:03,030 and process her feelings with another staff member. 868 00:53:03,030 --> 00:53:05,490 Chloe stubbornly remained in her seat, 869 00:53:05,490 --> 00:53:07,980 arms crossed over her chest 870 00:53:07,980 --> 00:53:11,675 and continued with the verbal, 871 00:53:11,675 --> 00:53:14,403 very graphic, very loud threats. 872 00:53:15,930 --> 00:53:20,370 So does Chloe's behavior 873 00:53:20,370 --> 00:53:23,220 pose a substantial risk 874 00:53:23,220 --> 00:53:24,903 and an imminent risk? 875 00:53:39,060 --> 00:53:42,453 Okay, go ahead and hit Enter. 876 00:53:50,760 --> 00:53:53,283 I'm seeing almost all no's. 877 00:53:56,130 --> 00:53:59,460 And so the answer is that, 878 00:53:59,460 --> 00:54:02,370 no, Chloe's behavior is not posing 879 00:54:02,370 --> 00:54:04,923 a substantial risk of harm yet. 880 00:54:06,150 --> 00:54:09,540 She is remained seated in her desk, 881 00:54:09,540 --> 00:54:14,010 even with her arms crossed across her chest, 882 00:54:14,010 --> 00:54:17,640 and she doesn't have a 10-inch blade 883 00:54:17,640 --> 00:54:19,290 on her person right now. 884 00:54:19,290 --> 00:54:21,090 She's not wielding that blade. 885 00:54:21,090 --> 00:54:25,110 And chances are her boyfriend's car is not 886 00:54:25,110 --> 00:54:29,310 inside the school building ready to be called 887 00:54:29,310 --> 00:54:30,993 to run over the teacher. 888 00:54:32,970 --> 00:54:37,623 Let's go to the next slide, which still involves Chloe. 889 00:54:38,730 --> 00:54:43,500 This time Chloe begins angrily tearing pieces of paper 890 00:54:43,500 --> 00:54:45,540 from her spiral notebook. 891 00:54:45,540 --> 00:54:47,700 She's wadding them up into balls. 892 00:54:47,700 --> 00:54:50,130 And I should mention that once again, 893 00:54:50,130 --> 00:54:54,090 Chloe's a high school student, very large and strong, 894 00:54:54,090 --> 00:54:56,280 she's on the rugby team. 895 00:54:56,280 --> 00:54:59,359 She's wadding them up into balls 896 00:54:59,359 --> 00:55:01,710 and throwing them directly at her teacher. 897 00:55:01,710 --> 00:55:03,180 She has good aim. 898 00:55:03,180 --> 00:55:05,580 And several of the paper balls strike 899 00:55:05,580 --> 00:55:07,983 the teacher's head and torso. 900 00:55:09,060 --> 00:55:11,940 Is Chloe's behavior now posing 901 00:55:11,940 --> 00:55:14,463 a substantial risk of imminent harm. 902 00:55:16,830 --> 00:55:19,383 Once again, type in your answer, 903 00:55:20,303 --> 00:55:23,973 but don't press Send until I give you the cue. 904 00:55:36,182 --> 00:55:38,682 Okay, go ahead and press Send. 905 00:55:42,480 --> 00:55:46,203 I'm seeing some mixed responses, but mostly no's. 906 00:55:47,280 --> 00:55:50,730 And the answer is no. 907 00:55:50,730 --> 00:55:54,930 This doesn't represent a substantial risk of harm. 908 00:55:54,930 --> 00:55:58,710 It is imminent. She is in the act of doing it. 909 00:55:58,710 --> 00:56:03,710 But paper balls don't pose the risk of a serious injury. 910 00:56:05,940 --> 00:56:08,310 You know, I suppose a case could be made 911 00:56:08,310 --> 00:56:12,480 that it could strike the teacher's open eyeball 912 00:56:12,480 --> 00:56:15,360 and cause a tear to her cornea. 913 00:56:15,360 --> 00:56:17,310 But I think that would be 914 00:56:17,310 --> 00:56:21,510 a very rare possibility 915 00:56:21,510 --> 00:56:22,380 of that happening. 916 00:56:22,380 --> 00:56:25,260 And, generally, paper balls don't 917 00:56:25,260 --> 00:56:27,600 really cause any serious injuries. 918 00:56:27,600 --> 00:56:30,060 So no, that wouldn't be, 919 00:56:30,060 --> 00:56:31,770 that wouldn't rise to the standard 920 00:56:31,770 --> 00:56:35,343 of allowing a physical restraint or a seclusion. 921 00:56:36,360 --> 00:56:39,633 Let's go to the next poll that is still with Chloe. 922 00:56:40,830 --> 00:56:45,630 This time, when the teacher moved closer to Chloe's desk, 923 00:56:45,630 --> 00:56:50,160 Chloe stood up and hurled her desk at the teacher, 924 00:56:50,160 --> 00:56:52,680 then began grabbing random objects 925 00:56:52,680 --> 00:56:56,520 like chairs, the classroom globe, staplers, 926 00:56:56,520 --> 00:56:59,403 and she threw those at the teacher as well. 927 00:57:00,270 --> 00:57:05,010 Does Chloe's behavior now pose a substantial risk, 928 00:57:05,010 --> 00:57:07,323 an imminent risk of substantial harm. 929 00:57:23,460 --> 00:57:25,203 Go ahead and press Send now. 930 00:57:27,802 --> 00:57:30,517 I'm seeing a big cascade here. 931 00:57:35,550 --> 00:57:36,383 Okay. 932 00:57:37,740 --> 00:57:38,610 Yes. 933 00:57:38,610 --> 00:57:40,590 The answer is that yes, 934 00:57:40,590 --> 00:57:43,893 this is a substantial and imminent threat. 935 00:57:45,000 --> 00:57:48,270 Chloe has access to all of these objects. 936 00:57:48,270 --> 00:57:50,130 They are heavy objects 937 00:57:50,130 --> 00:57:54,060 that could cause significant physical injuries. 938 00:57:54,060 --> 00:57:57,600 And she's carrying through with these threats now, 939 00:57:57,600 --> 00:58:00,390 it's no longer just a verbal threat. 940 00:58:00,390 --> 00:58:02,253 She is actually doing so. 941 00:58:05,370 --> 00:58:08,580 Certainly, the teacher would want to move away. 942 00:58:08,580 --> 00:58:10,770 The teacher would probably ask 943 00:58:10,770 --> 00:58:14,070 to have the classroom evacuated. 944 00:58:14,070 --> 00:58:18,150 And if there were no other adults, 945 00:58:18,150 --> 00:58:22,020 the teacher would need to remain nearby. 946 00:58:22,020 --> 00:58:23,940 But she would probably want 947 00:58:23,940 --> 00:58:28,110 to seclude Chloe 948 00:58:28,110 --> 00:58:29,280 in that room. 949 00:58:29,280 --> 00:58:31,740 But we will get more into the fine line 950 00:58:31,740 --> 00:58:34,650 between whether or not seclusion is allowable 951 00:58:34,650 --> 00:58:35,643 in just a minute. 952 00:58:38,340 --> 00:58:42,520 And also just like to add that I saw several people noted 953 00:58:43,710 --> 00:58:48,710 that some of the prior activities were not imminent harm, 954 00:58:49,050 --> 00:58:50,880 but they were of concern. 955 00:58:50,880 --> 00:58:52,935 And I think that's, 956 00:58:52,935 --> 00:58:54,745 it's important to note that simply 957 00:58:54,745 --> 00:58:57,180 because something does not represent imminent harm, 958 00:58:57,180 --> 00:58:58,710 it does not rise to that bar. 959 00:58:58,710 --> 00:59:02,010 It doesn't mean that it goes unaddressed. 960 00:59:02,010 --> 00:59:03,150 Absolutely. 961 00:59:03,150 --> 00:59:07,860 That we're talking about restraint and seclusion here, 962 00:59:07,860 --> 00:59:10,890 but there are other levels 963 00:59:10,890 --> 00:59:14,250 of intervention that could and should take place 964 00:59:14,250 --> 00:59:16,890 when a situation like this arises. 965 00:59:16,890 --> 00:59:18,360 And we're not saying 966 00:59:18,360 --> 00:59:20,880 that this is something to simply ignore. 967 00:59:20,880 --> 00:59:25,462 Another example that I see not infrequently is 968 00:59:25,462 --> 00:59:27,900 when a student, particularly a very young student, 969 00:59:27,900 --> 00:59:30,120 may make a threat in the classroom 970 00:59:30,120 --> 00:59:31,923 that they're going to use a firearm. 971 00:59:32,940 --> 00:59:35,280 Clearly they don't have a firearm with them. 972 00:59:35,280 --> 00:59:37,680 And that that is not a threat 973 00:59:37,680 --> 00:59:40,380 of imminent harm in that moment. 974 00:59:40,380 --> 00:59:42,420 However, it's a concern 975 00:59:42,420 --> 00:59:45,949 and one that definitely needs to be followed through 976 00:59:45,949 --> 00:59:48,240 by the school officials just to ensure 977 00:59:48,240 --> 00:59:51,090 does that student have access outside of school? 978 00:59:51,090 --> 00:59:53,190 Is this something that we need to continue to monitor? 979 00:59:53,190 --> 00:59:56,250 And sadly, we've seen recently 980 00:59:56,250 --> 00:59:58,740 that there's little, if any, age limit 981 00:59:58,740 --> 01:00:01,890 to when these circumstances could arise. 982 01:00:01,890 --> 01:00:05,400 So just to say we're not advising 983 01:00:05,400 --> 01:00:06,720 that you simply ignore something 984 01:00:06,720 --> 01:00:08,520 because it doesn't rise to that bar. 985 01:00:11,820 --> 01:00:12,653 Correct. 986 01:00:14,070 --> 01:00:18,900 Let's go on to discuss the permissible use of seclusion. 987 01:00:18,900 --> 01:00:20,040 And this is tricky. 988 01:00:20,040 --> 01:00:24,840 This is an area in which we've gotten lots of questions, 989 01:00:24,840 --> 01:00:27,072 a lot of debate, 990 01:00:27,072 --> 01:00:30,720 and we have actually issued some written guidance 991 01:00:30,720 --> 01:00:32,490 around that, around this. 992 01:00:32,490 --> 01:00:35,100 And you'll find that in some of the materials 993 01:00:35,100 --> 01:00:38,340 that Cassandra has posted on the web. 994 01:00:38,340 --> 01:00:42,330 So seclusion may be used 995 01:00:42,330 --> 01:00:44,160 only when, you're gonna hear me say 996 01:00:44,160 --> 01:00:45,570 this over and over again, 997 01:00:45,570 --> 01:00:48,120 the student's behavior poses imminent risk 998 01:00:48,120 --> 01:00:51,180 of substantial physical injury, 999 01:00:51,180 --> 01:00:55,320 only when less restrictive interventions have failed 1000 01:00:55,320 --> 01:00:59,490 or would be ineffective to prevent harm, 1001 01:00:59,490 --> 01:01:02,430 only to be used by staff who are trained 1002 01:01:02,430 --> 01:01:06,093 to use a restraint or seclusion. 1003 01:01:06,960 --> 01:01:11,553 Seclusions are only to be temporary interventions. 1004 01:01:12,480 --> 01:01:15,690 They're meant to be monitored at all times. 1005 01:01:15,690 --> 01:01:18,753 The student must be monitored at all times. 1006 01:01:19,860 --> 01:01:23,820 The seclusion space has to be large enough 1007 01:01:23,820 --> 01:01:28,800 to allow safe, sorry, I'm getting pinged 1008 01:01:28,800 --> 01:01:30,480 and it's distracted. 1009 01:01:30,480 --> 01:01:35,070 We have an an agency-wide meeting going on right now 1010 01:01:35,070 --> 01:01:37,050 and I keep getting notifications. 1011 01:01:37,050 --> 01:01:37,883 Anyway. 1012 01:01:40,530 --> 01:01:43,320 The seclusion space needs to be large enough 1013 01:01:43,320 --> 01:01:45,720 to permit safe movement. 1014 01:01:45,720 --> 01:01:48,840 It needs to be adequately lit, heated, ventilated, 1015 01:01:48,840 --> 01:01:51,030 free of dangerous objects, 1016 01:01:51,030 --> 01:01:52,890 and it needs to be in compliance 1017 01:01:52,890 --> 01:01:55,323 with all fire and safety codes. 1018 01:01:56,940 --> 01:01:58,710 Seclusion can be used 1019 01:01:58,710 --> 01:02:03,150 if there are no known contraindications. 1020 01:02:03,150 --> 01:02:06,070 For example, some students 1021 01:02:08,495 --> 01:02:09,510 may have a history of trauma 1022 01:02:09,510 --> 01:02:12,960 that involved severe neglect 1023 01:02:12,960 --> 01:02:14,520 where they had been left alone 1024 01:02:14,520 --> 01:02:17,910 in their rooms for long periods of time. 1025 01:02:17,910 --> 01:02:20,640 And a team may have gotten together 1026 01:02:20,640 --> 01:02:21,970 or a therapist 1027 01:02:26,250 --> 01:02:27,083 may have advised 1028 01:02:27,083 --> 01:02:30,390 that seclusion is really contraindicated for this student. 1029 01:02:30,390 --> 01:02:35,250 So you can't use seclusion in those instances. 1030 01:02:35,250 --> 01:02:36,760 And also seclusion 1031 01:02:39,090 --> 01:02:43,590 is permissible when physical intervention 1032 01:02:43,590 --> 01:02:45,633 is contraindicated. 1033 01:02:47,130 --> 01:02:49,210 So let's advance this slide 1034 01:02:50,098 --> 01:02:52,377 and let me review all of these . 1035 01:02:53,430 --> 01:02:55,560 Again, imminent risk, 1036 01:02:55,560 --> 01:02:58,350 less restrictive interventions have failed, 1037 01:02:58,350 --> 01:03:01,410 temporary interventions only when monitored, 1038 01:03:01,410 --> 01:03:04,217 space meets criteria. 1039 01:03:04,217 --> 01:03:07,377 There are no known contraindications to seclusions 1040 01:03:08,370 --> 01:03:12,240 and only when physical restraint 1041 01:03:12,240 --> 01:03:13,953 is contraindicated. 1042 01:03:15,090 --> 01:03:20,090 This is a point that is made very clearly in the rules. 1043 01:03:22,410 --> 01:03:24,060 And what it suggests, 1044 01:03:24,060 --> 01:03:27,810 and what it means is that physical restraint 1045 01:03:27,810 --> 01:03:30,840 is the preferable intervention. 1046 01:03:30,840 --> 01:03:34,650 Physical restraint, although it may seem counterintuitive 1047 01:03:34,650 --> 01:03:38,430 to a lot of people, physical restraint is considered 1048 01:03:38,430 --> 01:03:41,940 the less restrictive intervention 1049 01:03:41,940 --> 01:03:46,290 and therefore seclusion is not allowed 1050 01:03:46,290 --> 01:03:50,853 unless physical restraint is contraindicated. 1051 01:03:52,140 --> 01:03:54,570 Now, there may be many reasons 1052 01:03:54,570 --> 01:03:58,020 why restraint is contraindicated, 1053 01:03:58,020 --> 01:04:01,380 and I even mentioned with Chloe a minute ago 1054 01:04:01,380 --> 01:04:03,693 that that might be something to consider. 1055 01:04:05,996 --> 01:04:08,430 So I'll get into those things later. 1056 01:04:08,430 --> 01:04:10,953 But first let's do some polls. 1057 01:04:12,720 --> 01:04:16,443 So we're gonna talk about D'Andre. 1058 01:04:17,460 --> 01:04:21,300 When he was told that he would need to edit an essay 1059 01:04:21,300 --> 01:04:24,390 that he'd written the previous day, 1060 01:04:24,390 --> 01:04:26,290 D'Andre lost his temper 1061 01:04:27,266 --> 01:04:31,080 and climbed to the top of a tall shelf next to the windows 1062 01:04:31,080 --> 01:04:33,360 where he began pounding his fists 1063 01:04:33,360 --> 01:04:36,330 in an attempt to break the glass. 1064 01:04:36,330 --> 01:04:39,750 Then he began banging his own head forcefully 1065 01:04:39,750 --> 01:04:41,910 against the window. 1066 01:04:41,910 --> 01:04:44,220 The teacher evacuated the classroom, 1067 01:04:44,220 --> 01:04:46,830 fearing that the glass may shatter 1068 01:04:46,830 --> 01:04:50,190 and cause harm to D'Andre and others. 1069 01:04:50,190 --> 01:04:54,750 The classroom assistant who was CPI trained remained 1070 01:04:54,750 --> 01:04:56,880 in the classroom with D'Andre 1071 01:04:56,880 --> 01:05:00,690 and tried several deescalation techniques, 1072 01:05:00,690 --> 01:05:03,330 but the behaviors continued. 1073 01:05:03,330 --> 01:05:08,130 At that point, another CPI trained staff member arrived 1074 01:05:08,130 --> 01:05:13,130 and together they were able to persuade D'Andre 1075 01:05:13,650 --> 01:05:15,180 off the shelf. 1076 01:05:15,180 --> 01:05:18,420 And then they accompanied him to the quiet room, 1077 01:05:18,420 --> 01:05:20,520 placed him in seclusion. 1078 01:05:20,520 --> 01:05:22,380 They were outside of the room, 1079 01:05:22,380 --> 01:05:24,060 the door was closed, 1080 01:05:24,060 --> 01:05:27,060 and he needed to be there 1081 01:05:27,060 --> 01:05:30,963 until he was no longer showing aggressive behaviors. 1082 01:05:31,980 --> 01:05:33,600 So the question is, 1083 01:05:33,600 --> 01:05:38,600 is seclusion permissible in this example with D'Andre? 1084 01:05:38,850 --> 01:05:40,575 [Participant] Yes. 1085 01:05:40,575 --> 01:05:41,640 And why or why not? 1086 01:05:41,640 --> 01:05:45,900 Type in your answer, but don't press Send yet. 1087 01:05:45,900 --> 01:05:48,573 Let's give everyone think time about this. 1088 01:06:01,740 --> 01:06:03,970 I'm going to answer that question 1089 01:06:05,130 --> 01:06:10,130 after we've discussed this specific example. 1090 01:06:16,500 --> 01:06:19,293 Okay, go ahead and press Send, everyone. 1091 01:06:29,370 --> 01:06:33,033 I'm seeing a lot of no's, but some yeses. 1092 01:06:34,827 --> 01:06:35,660 [Participant] With an explanation why. 1093 01:06:35,660 --> 01:06:38,910 Yeah, this is confusing 1094 01:06:38,910 --> 01:06:43,290 and this is why we've written guidance around this, 1095 01:06:43,290 --> 01:06:45,330 but the answer is no. 1096 01:06:45,330 --> 01:06:48,870 Seclusion wouldn't be permissible in this instance 1097 01:06:48,870 --> 01:06:51,060 and let's talk about why. 1098 01:06:51,060 --> 01:06:52,313 [Participant] Yeah, please, do. 1099 01:06:53,641 --> 01:06:55,353 Somebody needs to mute, I think. 1100 01:06:58,260 --> 01:07:00,630 There were no other students in the room. 1101 01:07:00,630 --> 01:07:02,883 There were two staff members. 1102 01:07:03,905 --> 01:07:06,420 That provided the time and the space 1103 01:07:06,420 --> 01:07:09,963 to attempt additional deescalation techniques. 1104 01:07:10,860 --> 01:07:14,763 No other students were in the area and couldn't be harmed. 1105 01:07:15,900 --> 01:07:18,450 The staff may have been able to, 1106 01:07:18,450 --> 01:07:21,960 well, they did coax him down from the shelf 1107 01:07:21,960 --> 01:07:23,710 and they could have corralled him 1108 01:07:24,649 --> 01:07:26,049 to a safer part of the room. 1109 01:07:27,300 --> 01:07:30,330 And staff had the ability to restrain him 1110 01:07:30,330 --> 01:07:32,760 in that evacuated classroom. 1111 01:07:32,760 --> 01:07:34,113 So once again, 1112 01:07:34,950 --> 01:07:39,930 restraint is considered the less restrictive intervention. 1113 01:07:39,930 --> 01:07:42,960 And so, given the fact 1114 01:07:42,960 --> 01:07:46,860 that he was continuing the self-injurious 1115 01:07:46,860 --> 01:07:50,280 and the aggressive behavior towards others 1116 01:07:50,280 --> 01:07:55,280 and was not responding to any of the deescalation techniques 1117 01:07:55,500 --> 01:07:57,423 that were being used, 1118 01:07:58,290 --> 01:08:01,149 the two trained staff members 1119 01:08:01,149 --> 01:08:03,390 should have restrained D'Andre 1120 01:08:03,390 --> 01:08:05,763 rather than taking him to seclusion. 1121 01:08:07,890 --> 01:08:11,913 Let's talk about D'Andre some more in the next poll. 1122 01:08:13,950 --> 01:08:17,973 So same example, he's banging against the window. 1123 01:08:19,320 --> 01:08:22,020 The class has evacuated, 1124 01:08:22,020 --> 01:08:25,980 the assistant attempts a variety of strategies 1125 01:08:25,980 --> 01:08:28,650 to calm him to no avail. 1126 01:08:28,650 --> 01:08:33,363 So she restrains him properly using a CPI hold. 1127 01:08:34,200 --> 01:08:38,430 But D'Andre, who's very wiry and quick, 1128 01:08:38,430 --> 01:08:40,770 is able to escape that hold. 1129 01:08:40,770 --> 01:08:44,520 He now begins aggressing against the assistant, 1130 01:08:44,520 --> 01:08:46,620 biting, scratching and kicking. 1131 01:08:46,620 --> 01:08:48,210 Oops. 1132 01:08:48,210 --> 01:08:50,970 And no other staff members have arrived 1133 01:08:50,970 --> 01:08:53,043 to help contain the situation. 1134 01:08:54,180 --> 01:08:58,410 The assistant is able to persuade D'Andre 1135 01:08:58,410 --> 01:09:01,320 to walk with her to the quiet room. 1136 01:09:01,320 --> 01:09:04,920 And she walks in the quiet room with him 1137 01:09:04,920 --> 01:09:07,410 and they're both inside that room, 1138 01:09:07,410 --> 01:09:11,460 but then D'Andre punches and kicks the assistant some more 1139 01:09:11,460 --> 01:09:12,930 and she's not confident 1140 01:09:12,930 --> 01:09:15,660 that she'll be able to hold him safely. 1141 01:09:15,660 --> 01:09:19,140 So she steps out of the room, closes the door, 1142 01:09:19,140 --> 01:09:22,590 and secludes him, visually monitoring him, 1143 01:09:22,590 --> 01:09:25,293 but calling for additional support as well. 1144 01:09:26,700 --> 01:09:28,560 Take your time and think this over. 1145 01:09:28,560 --> 01:09:30,060 Type in your answer, 1146 01:09:30,060 --> 01:09:33,547 but don't press Send until I give you the cue. 1147 01:10:03,885 --> 01:10:06,385 Okay. Go ahead and press Send. 1148 01:10:17,880 --> 01:10:19,440 Great. 1149 01:10:19,440 --> 01:10:22,980 Yeah, I'm seeing mostly yeses and yes, 1150 01:10:22,980 --> 01:10:25,350 this is a permissible use of seclusion. 1151 01:10:25,350 --> 01:10:27,633 And let's talk about why that's so. 1152 01:10:28,861 --> 01:10:29,910 First, the staff member 1153 01:10:29,910 --> 01:10:33,480 tried several deescalation strategies. 1154 01:10:33,480 --> 01:10:36,630 She then did attempt the restraint, 1155 01:10:36,630 --> 01:10:40,170 which is the less restrictive intervention, more preferable. 1156 01:10:40,170 --> 01:10:42,030 But the student remained aggressive 1157 01:10:42,030 --> 01:10:44,493 and was able to escape the hold. 1158 01:10:46,140 --> 01:10:47,880 In my professional opinion, 1159 01:10:47,880 --> 01:10:50,250 the staff member made the sound decision 1160 01:10:50,250 --> 01:10:54,033 to accompany the student into the quiet room. 1161 01:10:54,930 --> 01:10:56,730 And I think that was a sound decision 1162 01:10:56,730 --> 01:11:01,410 because D'Andre had complied with her and had walked there, 1163 01:11:01,410 --> 01:11:04,380 which indicates to me that maybe he was, 1164 01:11:04,380 --> 01:11:08,670 maybe the act of walking alone had deescalated him. 1165 01:11:08,670 --> 01:11:11,310 So she went into the quiet room with him. 1166 01:11:11,310 --> 01:11:14,430 That wouldn't be considered a seclusion. 1167 01:11:14,430 --> 01:11:19,140 But then when D'Andre rescaled and became aggressive, 1168 01:11:19,140 --> 01:11:20,940 I think it was a sound judgment 1169 01:11:20,940 --> 01:11:25,563 for her to exit the room and seclude him. 1170 01:11:26,970 --> 01:11:29,400 She had no other assistance. 1171 01:11:29,400 --> 01:11:32,853 She'd already attempted restraint and failed. 1172 01:11:33,780 --> 01:11:38,130 She was likely fatigued, she was possibly injured. 1173 01:11:38,130 --> 01:11:41,580 She probably lacked confidence in her ability 1174 01:11:41,580 --> 01:11:44,010 to restrain D'Andre further. 1175 01:11:44,010 --> 01:11:46,020 So in this case, 1176 01:11:46,020 --> 01:11:49,230 I would say that seclusion is permissible. 1177 01:11:49,230 --> 01:11:51,120 I can't think of anything else 1178 01:11:51,120 --> 01:11:54,540 she might have done differently 1179 01:11:54,540 --> 01:11:57,483 to avoid the use of the seclusion. 1180 01:12:01,620 --> 01:12:03,720 Tracy, we have a question in the chat. 1181 01:12:03,720 --> 01:12:04,553 Oh, okay. 1182 01:12:07,980 --> 01:12:09,870 Can you explain this a little bit better? 1183 01:12:09,870 --> 01:12:11,490 My concern is that when you are 1184 01:12:11,490 --> 01:12:15,960 in a student's personal space and using force to restrain, 1185 01:12:15,960 --> 01:12:18,150 this seems to be more restrictive 1186 01:12:18,150 --> 01:12:21,720 than having a student in a safe place where they're safe 1187 01:12:21,720 --> 01:12:24,330 and being supported by an adult. 1188 01:12:24,330 --> 01:12:29,330 I totally get the question. 1189 01:12:30,000 --> 01:12:32,253 Cassandra, you're the one that wrote that. 1190 01:12:34,320 --> 01:12:36,437 No, I just shared it. 1191 01:12:36,437 --> 01:12:38,310 Excellent question. Oh, okay. 1192 01:12:38,310 --> 01:12:39,810 It's an excellent question 1193 01:12:39,810 --> 01:12:43,020 and it's a question that we get a lot of the time, 1194 01:12:43,020 --> 01:12:46,860 as I mentioned, it seems counterintuitive. 1195 01:12:46,860 --> 01:12:49,950 It seems counterintuitive to me 1196 01:12:49,950 --> 01:12:52,743 until I really begin to digest it. 1197 01:12:53,940 --> 01:12:58,940 What I can say is that the rule was written 1198 01:13:00,150 --> 01:13:03,550 before I came to the agency, and I wasn't involved 1199 01:13:05,225 --> 01:13:07,380 in the public comment period. 1200 01:13:07,380 --> 01:13:10,500 But there was a lot of public input 1201 01:13:10,500 --> 01:13:14,163 into the making of these and crafting of these rules. 1202 01:13:15,600 --> 01:13:20,310 Many different types of people had input 1203 01:13:20,310 --> 01:13:22,410 into the writing of the rules, 1204 01:13:22,410 --> 01:13:24,930 therapists, physicians, parents, 1205 01:13:24,930 --> 01:13:28,563 advocates, multidisciplinary people. 1206 01:13:31,566 --> 01:13:33,210 And it was written specifically 1207 01:13:33,210 --> 01:13:36,600 because all of those people felt 1208 01:13:36,600 --> 01:13:41,600 that restraint really is the less restrictive intervention. 1209 01:13:43,620 --> 01:13:47,777 The other thing I would add is that there is federal 1210 01:13:48,960 --> 01:13:51,750 as well as some state legislation 1211 01:13:51,750 --> 01:13:56,750 that is in the wings, 1212 01:13:57,090 --> 01:13:58,980 hasn't yet been enacted, 1213 01:13:58,980 --> 01:14:03,980 but is written as an act, I think, 1214 01:14:05,469 --> 01:14:10,320 and that actually forbids 1215 01:14:10,320 --> 01:14:12,090 the use of seclusion. 1216 01:14:12,090 --> 01:14:13,650 There are many states, 1217 01:14:13,650 --> 01:14:16,930 several states that have gone ahead 1218 01:14:17,808 --> 01:14:19,890 and banned seclusion altogether. 1219 01:14:19,890 --> 01:14:22,230 We have some districts in Vermont 1220 01:14:22,230 --> 01:14:24,300 that have banned the use of restraint, 1221 01:14:24,300 --> 01:14:27,180 or I mean, sorry, of seclusion. 1222 01:14:27,180 --> 01:14:31,650 And there is a bill waiting in our state legislature 1223 01:14:31,650 --> 01:14:34,050 that would propose 1224 01:14:34,050 --> 01:14:37,050 to ban the use of seclusion. 1225 01:14:37,050 --> 01:14:39,240 Of course, you know, 1226 01:14:39,240 --> 01:14:42,090 there are going to be exceptions 1227 01:14:42,090 --> 01:14:46,830 such as if it's determined to be contraindicated. 1228 01:14:46,830 --> 01:14:50,373 But that's what I can explain. 1229 01:14:52,050 --> 01:14:53,800 Yeah, I think it's also important 1230 01:14:56,340 --> 01:14:58,260 to think about what's going on 1231 01:14:58,260 --> 01:15:01,134 when these circumstances take place. 1232 01:15:01,134 --> 01:15:04,830 That a student who is in seclusion is not a student, 1233 01:15:04,830 --> 01:15:08,250 is who's in there sitting quietly 1234 01:15:08,250 --> 01:15:10,140 and showing well-regulated behavior. 1235 01:15:10,140 --> 01:15:12,890 If that were the case, then the seclusion needs to end. 1236 01:15:15,270 --> 01:15:18,000 One of the more challenging parts of my job recently, 1237 01:15:18,000 --> 01:15:21,540 since I've been looking at violation notices of 4500, 1238 01:15:21,540 --> 01:15:25,380 is reading the accounts of what is taking place 1239 01:15:25,380 --> 01:15:28,710 when students are in seclusion for extended periods of time. 1240 01:15:28,710 --> 01:15:31,420 And I won't go into details, but I will tell you 1241 01:15:32,283 --> 01:15:35,133 that it's oftentimes pretty shocking. 1242 01:15:37,200 --> 01:15:39,960 As difficult as it may be 1243 01:15:39,960 --> 01:15:42,270 for a student to be physically restrained, 1244 01:15:42,270 --> 01:15:43,770 I think on the whole, 1245 01:15:43,770 --> 01:15:46,530 a student who is experiencing that level 1246 01:15:46,530 --> 01:15:49,230 of crisis or dysregulation, 1247 01:15:49,230 --> 01:15:52,350 whatever term you might prefer to use, 1248 01:15:52,350 --> 01:15:55,320 they're probably much safer when they're in a restraint 1249 01:15:55,320 --> 01:15:57,420 with trained adults than they are 1250 01:15:57,420 --> 01:15:59,913 when they're left in a seclusion room. 1251 01:16:01,020 --> 01:16:03,000 The reports I get of seclusion rooms 1252 01:16:03,000 --> 01:16:06,960 literally being demolished are not infrequent. 1253 01:16:06,960 --> 01:16:08,800 The reports of students engaging 1254 01:16:09,929 --> 01:16:13,860 in significantly potentially self-injurious behaviors 1255 01:16:13,860 --> 01:16:15,303 are also fairly frequent. 1256 01:16:17,048 --> 01:16:21,750 It's when you take into account the overall circumstances 1257 01:16:21,750 --> 01:16:24,510 of what is happening when a student is in seclusion, 1258 01:16:24,510 --> 01:16:27,990 it becomes a lot more understandable as to why seclusion 1259 01:16:27,990 --> 01:16:30,603 is not the preferred approach. 1260 01:16:31,920 --> 01:16:35,680 Students can get very dysregulated very quickly 1261 01:16:37,680 --> 01:16:39,213 when they're secluded. 1262 01:16:40,440 --> 01:16:44,220 And Adam 1263 01:16:44,220 --> 01:16:46,800 just is asking 1264 01:16:46,800 --> 01:16:50,790 for additional clarification for his understanding 1265 01:16:50,790 --> 01:16:54,000 that seclusion is when the child is the only person 1266 01:16:54,000 --> 01:16:58,394 in the room and there's no staff member in there 1267 01:16:58,394 --> 01:17:01,380 to support or provide personal assistance. 1268 01:17:01,380 --> 01:17:02,403 That's correct. 1269 01:17:05,610 --> 01:17:07,035 Okay. 1270 01:17:07,035 --> 01:17:09,580 I am going to still get into this further 1271 01:17:10,560 --> 01:17:12,990 and can answer more questions, 1272 01:17:12,990 --> 01:17:17,220 but let's go to, I think it's one more poll. 1273 01:17:17,220 --> 01:17:20,280 I might be wrong. There may be another one with D'Andre. 1274 01:17:20,280 --> 01:17:23,460 But poll number 13, 1275 01:17:23,460 --> 01:17:27,000 D'Andre's team in this instance 1276 01:17:27,000 --> 01:17:29,340 had taken a look at his data. 1277 01:17:29,340 --> 01:17:31,650 They'd consulted with his therapist 1278 01:17:31,650 --> 01:17:36,120 and determined that physical restraint is contraindicated 1279 01:17:36,120 --> 01:17:40,320 for him because he has a history of sexual trauma. 1280 01:17:40,320 --> 01:17:42,840 And the data has shown that restraints 1281 01:17:42,840 --> 01:17:45,183 only escalated him further. 1282 01:17:46,050 --> 01:17:49,500 So in this instance, 1283 01:17:49,500 --> 01:17:53,343 physical restraint has been contraindicated. 1284 01:17:54,930 --> 01:17:57,750 So this time D'Andre's teacher directed him 1285 01:17:57,750 --> 01:18:00,060 to go to the quiet room 1286 01:18:00,060 --> 01:18:04,560 and with the classroom assistant accompanying him, 1287 01:18:04,560 --> 01:18:05,970 he complied. 1288 01:18:05,970 --> 01:18:09,750 Once they'd arrived at the seclusion space however, 1289 01:18:09,750 --> 01:18:14,190 D'Andre again punches and kicks the assistant. 1290 01:18:14,190 --> 01:18:17,160 The assistant tells Deandre that he is to remain 1291 01:18:17,160 --> 01:18:21,600 in the quiet room for the remainder of that class period 1292 01:18:21,600 --> 01:18:24,150 and until recess ends. 1293 01:18:24,150 --> 01:18:27,780 The assistant closes the door and visually monitors him 1294 01:18:27,780 --> 01:18:31,383 from the outside of the room throughout that period of time. 1295 01:18:32,550 --> 01:18:37,550 Is this unacceptable or permissible use of restraint? 1296 01:18:38,400 --> 01:18:41,013 Type in your answers, but don't press Send yet. 1297 01:18:44,010 --> 01:18:45,933 Permissible use of seclusion. 1298 01:18:46,860 --> 01:18:47,880 What's that? 1299 01:18:47,880 --> 01:18:49,863 Seclusion, correct? 1300 01:18:51,660 --> 01:18:53,190 Did I say restraint? 1301 01:18:53,190 --> 01:18:54,450 -Yeah. -Sorry. 1302 01:18:54,450 --> 01:18:57,093 Is this a permissible use of seclusion? 1303 01:19:16,096 --> 01:19:17,423 Okay, go ahead and press Send. 1304 01:19:34,901 --> 01:19:35,734 Okay. 1305 01:19:35,734 --> 01:19:37,810 Getting some mixed reviews. 1306 01:19:37,810 --> 01:19:40,770 And I have to confess, this is a trick question. 1307 01:19:40,770 --> 01:19:42,843 I pulled a quick one on you. 1308 01:19:43,830 --> 01:19:47,433 But the answer is no and let me explain why. 1309 01:19:49,470 --> 01:19:53,970 It was permissible to use seclusion rather than restraint 1310 01:19:53,970 --> 01:19:56,410 because there was a team decision 1311 01:19:57,455 --> 01:20:01,350 that would contraindicate restraint. 1312 01:20:01,350 --> 01:20:05,490 But the reason that this particular seclusion 1313 01:20:05,490 --> 01:20:09,510 is not permissible is that seclusion 1314 01:20:09,510 --> 01:20:13,050 is only meant as a temporary intervention. 1315 01:20:13,050 --> 01:20:15,630 And the assistant told D'Andre 1316 01:20:15,630 --> 01:20:17,700 that he would have to stay there 1317 01:20:17,700 --> 01:20:22,080 for the rest of the class period and through recess. 1318 01:20:22,080 --> 01:20:26,490 We are not allowed to put arbitrary time limits 1319 01:20:26,490 --> 01:20:30,873 on the amount of time a student is to spend in seclusion. 1320 01:20:31,800 --> 01:20:34,440 And in fact, seclusion should be terminated 1321 01:20:34,440 --> 01:20:37,800 as soon as the student no longer poses 1322 01:20:37,800 --> 01:20:40,920 an imminent risk of substantial harm, 1323 01:20:40,920 --> 01:20:43,860 or as soon as less restrictive interventions 1324 01:20:43,860 --> 01:20:45,843 might prove successful. 1325 01:20:47,250 --> 01:20:48,720 So if you answered yes 1326 01:20:48,720 --> 01:20:53,490 because the team had a contraindicated restraint, 1327 01:20:53,490 --> 01:20:55,560 you're right in that reasoning. 1328 01:20:55,560 --> 01:21:00,560 But you have to remember that seclusions are only temporary. 1329 01:21:01,020 --> 01:21:02,720 We can't put a time limit on them. 1330 01:21:04,710 --> 01:21:07,830 And let me just look at my notes. Yes. 1331 01:21:07,830 --> 01:21:10,440 So one more thing that I wanted to say 1332 01:21:10,440 --> 01:21:14,520 about how you might determine 1333 01:21:14,520 --> 01:21:18,150 whether a physical restraint is contraindicated. 1334 01:21:18,150 --> 01:21:22,380 There may be many reasons that a team may decide 1335 01:21:22,380 --> 01:21:25,590 that restraint is contraindicated. 1336 01:21:25,590 --> 01:21:30,590 One person mentioned a history of sexual abuse. 1337 01:21:31,911 --> 01:21:33,720 That, if the team has gathered, 1338 01:21:33,720 --> 01:21:35,880 if the therapist has weighed in, 1339 01:21:35,880 --> 01:21:39,510 if all team members really agree, 1340 01:21:39,510 --> 01:21:42,960 that would a really valid reason 1341 01:21:42,960 --> 01:21:47,310 to contraindicate the use of restraint, 1342 01:21:47,310 --> 01:21:49,923 and to use seclusion. 1343 01:21:51,403 --> 01:21:54,720 Other things 1344 01:21:54,720 --> 01:21:56,910 may be a medical condition. 1345 01:21:56,910 --> 01:22:00,180 Certainly if the student has a broken arm or broken leg, 1346 01:22:00,180 --> 01:22:03,930 that might be a reason not to risk harming 1347 01:22:03,930 --> 01:22:06,363 the already injured bodily part. 1348 01:22:08,550 --> 01:22:12,360 Asthma, severe asthma, could be a reason 1349 01:22:12,360 --> 01:22:15,480 to not use physical restraint, 1350 01:22:15,480 --> 01:22:18,540 certainly not to use prone or supine, 1351 01:22:18,540 --> 01:22:22,263 but even sometimes with severe asthmatics, 1352 01:22:23,130 --> 01:22:25,530 even a standing or sitting hold 1353 01:22:25,530 --> 01:22:28,293 could induce an asthma attack. 1354 01:22:29,910 --> 01:22:33,150 And then don't forget your data. 1355 01:22:33,150 --> 01:22:36,540 Use common sense as a team. 1356 01:22:36,540 --> 01:22:38,040 Take data. 1357 01:22:38,040 --> 01:22:41,340 If you have data that supports, 1358 01:22:41,340 --> 01:22:45,330 and I think I put this in the example with D'Andre, 1359 01:22:45,330 --> 01:22:48,280 if you have data that supports your claim 1360 01:22:54,397 --> 01:22:58,470 that the student's behavior only escalates further, 1361 01:22:58,470 --> 01:23:03,060 then you would have valid reason to say, 1362 01:23:03,060 --> 01:23:07,953 let's try seclusion and see if that's more effective. 1363 01:23:09,660 --> 01:23:12,510 I mentioned with Chloe that you might want 1364 01:23:12,510 --> 01:23:16,740 to consider seclusion in that situation. 1365 01:23:16,740 --> 01:23:18,570 You would only consider seclusion 1366 01:23:18,570 --> 01:23:23,070 if the team had already considered restraint 1367 01:23:23,070 --> 01:23:25,590 to be contraindicated. 1368 01:23:25,590 --> 01:23:27,600 And the reason I mentioned it with Chloe 1369 01:23:27,600 --> 01:23:31,350 is that she was large and big and old. 1370 01:23:31,350 --> 01:23:36,350 And at some point a team may determine 1371 01:23:36,450 --> 01:23:40,770 that a child who is approaching the age of 18 1372 01:23:40,770 --> 01:23:43,380 and about to go out there into the real world 1373 01:23:43,380 --> 01:23:47,940 where police intervention can occur 1374 01:23:47,940 --> 01:23:50,700 and will occur if they become violent, 1375 01:23:50,700 --> 01:23:55,440 a team may decide A, that their size and strength 1376 01:23:55,440 --> 01:23:58,420 doesn't make it a safe intervention 1377 01:23:59,998 --> 01:24:02,283 for either Chloe or the staff member, 1378 01:24:04,020 --> 01:24:07,443 or that it's time for her to learn more. 1379 01:24:09,420 --> 01:24:14,253 It's just time not to impose the physical restraints. 1380 01:24:17,520 --> 01:24:19,560 Any questions? 1381 01:24:19,560 --> 01:24:20,970 Can a parent dictate 1382 01:24:20,970 --> 01:24:23,970 that a team should contraindicate restraint 1383 01:24:23,970 --> 01:24:25,833 without additional input? 1384 01:24:27,120 --> 01:24:29,643 The answer's no, but, 1385 01:24:30,750 --> 01:24:34,830 so any one person 1386 01:24:34,830 --> 01:24:37,840 doesn't have the ability to contraindicate 1387 01:24:39,420 --> 01:24:43,770 or to trump State Board of Ed rules. 1388 01:24:43,770 --> 01:24:45,900 It needs to be a team decision 1389 01:24:45,900 --> 01:24:50,900 and it needs to be made with input from a physician, 1390 01:24:52,326 --> 01:24:53,640 if that's relevant, 1391 01:24:53,640 --> 01:24:56,070 a therapist, if that's relevant. 1392 01:24:56,070 --> 01:24:58,020 And with all the team members, 1393 01:24:58,020 --> 01:25:00,780 with people who know the child well. 1394 01:25:00,780 --> 01:25:03,180 And the team comes together 1395 01:25:03,180 --> 01:25:08,180 and there's agreement. 1396 01:25:13,080 --> 01:25:15,000 History of trauma being left. 1397 01:25:15,000 --> 01:25:17,940 Oh, sorry, that was, nevermind. 1398 01:25:17,940 --> 01:25:19,953 Were there other questions? 1399 01:25:23,979 --> 01:25:25,779 No, I don't see any other questions. 1400 01:25:27,510 --> 01:25:28,440 Okay. 1401 01:25:28,440 --> 01:25:32,400 So I think now is when Tom's gonna take over again? 1402 01:25:32,400 --> 01:25:33,300 Yep. 1403 01:25:33,300 --> 01:25:36,050 We'll start talking about permissible use of restraint. 1404 01:25:38,310 --> 01:25:42,240 Okay, so once again, as we've said before, 1405 01:25:42,240 --> 01:25:45,227 restraint may only be used if there's imminent 1406 01:25:45,227 --> 01:25:47,153 and substantial risk of physical injury, 1407 01:25:48,090 --> 01:25:50,100 less restrictive interventions have failed 1408 01:25:50,100 --> 01:25:51,543 or would be ineffective. 1409 01:25:52,710 --> 01:25:56,160 It's in accordance with a school-wide safety plan, 1410 01:25:56,160 --> 01:26:00,877 monitored face-to-face, used in a manner that is safe, 1411 01:26:00,877 --> 01:26:01,710 proportionate and sensitive 1412 01:26:01,710 --> 01:26:03,570 to a range of student characteristics 1413 01:26:03,570 --> 01:26:06,600 and used by trained and certified staff. 1414 01:26:06,600 --> 01:26:08,280 And that last piece, 1415 01:26:08,280 --> 01:26:11,160 the trained and certified staff is perhaps the place 1416 01:26:11,160 --> 01:26:13,248 that we find at the agency 1417 01:26:13,248 --> 01:26:17,427 where we're more frequently likely to get violations 1418 01:26:18,630 --> 01:26:20,290 that either staff have 1419 01:26:22,590 --> 01:26:24,600 imposed restraints who are not trained 1420 01:26:24,600 --> 01:26:26,100 and certified to do that, 1421 01:26:26,100 --> 01:26:27,840 or they have training, 1422 01:26:27,840 --> 01:26:29,880 but they've used a restraint technique 1423 01:26:29,880 --> 01:26:32,013 that isn't approved by their training. 1424 01:26:33,420 --> 01:26:36,297 And keeping in mind also that prone and supine restraints 1425 01:26:36,297 --> 01:26:39,421 are only to be used when a student's size 1426 01:26:39,421 --> 01:26:41,250 and the severity of the behavior require these. 1427 01:26:41,250 --> 01:26:43,480 That this is a last resort 1428 01:26:44,430 --> 01:26:47,430 and should only be used if other techniques have failed 1429 01:26:47,430 --> 01:26:48,843 or would not be effective. 1430 01:26:52,440 --> 01:26:55,914 So in this poll we're talking about Abigail, 1431 01:26:55,914 --> 01:26:57,420 who's a kindergarten student, 1432 01:26:57,420 --> 01:26:59,160 and she's had some difficulties adjusting 1433 01:26:59,160 --> 01:27:01,380 to her new school environment. 1434 01:27:01,380 --> 01:27:04,056 Her mother has alerted the teacher 1435 01:27:04,056 --> 01:27:05,800 that Abigail's had a rough morning 1436 01:27:06,724 --> 01:27:07,557 and instead of putting her on the bus, 1437 01:27:07,557 --> 01:27:10,260 she was driving her to school that day. 1438 01:27:10,260 --> 01:27:13,080 There was a para assigned to Abigail's classroom 1439 01:27:13,080 --> 01:27:15,690 who met Abigail and her mother when they arrived. 1440 01:27:15,690 --> 01:27:19,050 Abigail was quiet, sullen, said goodbye to her mother 1441 01:27:19,050 --> 01:27:20,800 and began walking in with the para. 1442 01:27:21,750 --> 01:27:23,550 Right before entering the school doors, 1443 01:27:23,550 --> 01:27:25,080 Abigail had a change of heart 1444 01:27:25,080 --> 01:27:27,810 and ran right to the back of the school building 1445 01:27:27,810 --> 01:27:30,003 onto the playground, onto a swing. 1446 01:27:33,570 --> 01:27:35,820 The para who was trained to administer restraints 1447 01:27:35,820 --> 01:27:39,870 attempted a wide variety of less restrictive interventions 1448 01:27:39,870 --> 01:27:42,000 in an effort to encourage Abigail 1449 01:27:42,000 --> 01:27:44,250 to stop swinging and walk to class. 1450 01:27:44,250 --> 01:27:47,373 Abigail ignored these strategies and kept swinging. 1451 01:27:54,630 --> 01:27:56,643 Yeah, I think I need the next slide. 1452 01:27:59,700 --> 01:28:00,533 Okay. 1453 01:28:01,635 --> 01:28:03,248 Well, all right. 1454 01:28:03,248 --> 01:28:05,670 I thought there was more to the scenario, 1455 01:28:05,670 --> 01:28:07,110 so instead I gave away the answer, 1456 01:28:07,110 --> 01:28:11,561 which I'm hoping most of you would have arrived at anyway, 1457 01:28:11,561 --> 01:28:14,340 that, no, this is not a permissible use of restraint. 1458 01:28:14,340 --> 01:28:17,231 Clearly there is no risk 1459 01:28:17,231 --> 01:28:19,350 of imminent physical harm posed 1460 01:28:19,350 --> 01:28:21,690 by Abigail continuing on the swing. 1461 01:28:21,690 --> 01:28:24,670 And there would need to be other attempts 1462 01:28:26,806 --> 01:28:31,470 to work with Abigail other than physically restraining her, 1463 01:28:31,470 --> 01:28:32,940 or in this case, 1464 01:28:32,940 --> 01:28:35,490 possibly imposing a moving restraint, 1465 01:28:35,490 --> 01:28:38,493 which would also be risky to the student. 1466 01:28:39,350 --> 01:28:40,700 So you got a freebie there. 1467 01:28:47,700 --> 01:28:49,450 And I see that there was a question 1468 01:28:50,650 --> 01:28:52,650 before we move to the next poll. 1469 01:28:52,650 --> 01:28:55,663 That was me just answering a previous question. 1470 01:28:55,663 --> 01:28:57,450 -Oh, okay. -About seclusion. 1471 01:28:57,450 --> 01:28:58,980 Okay. Thank you. 1472 01:28:58,980 --> 01:29:03,360 All right, so same example with Abigail arriving at school. 1473 01:29:03,360 --> 01:29:05,130 But instead of running to the playground, 1474 01:29:05,130 --> 01:29:07,620 Abigail impulsively ran after her mother 1475 01:29:07,620 --> 01:29:09,690 and straight into the flow of oncoming traffic 1476 01:29:09,690 --> 01:29:12,510 in the roadway adjacent to the school property. 1477 01:29:12,510 --> 01:29:14,610 This time, the para ran after Abigail, 1478 01:29:14,610 --> 01:29:16,470 caught up to her just before she stepped 1479 01:29:16,470 --> 01:29:17,850 in front of a moving car. 1480 01:29:17,850 --> 01:29:20,313 The para held Abigail in a standing hold. 1481 01:29:21,663 --> 01:29:23,100 Abigail wriggled, kicked and then went limp, 1482 01:29:23,100 --> 01:29:24,930 refusing to stand and walk. 1483 01:29:24,930 --> 01:29:27,570 The parent continued the stationary standing restraint 1484 01:29:27,570 --> 01:29:30,270 until Abigail agreed to walk into the school building. 1485 01:29:31,260 --> 01:29:33,900 Would this be a permissible use of restraint? 1486 01:29:33,900 --> 01:29:36,180 And I'll give you a cue 1487 01:29:36,180 --> 01:29:39,753 when to enter your answers into the chat. 1488 01:29:46,020 --> 01:29:47,183 Why don't you go ahead. 1489 01:30:06,870 --> 01:30:10,950 And as most, if not all of you are answering, yes, 1490 01:30:10,950 --> 01:30:12,840 this is a permissible restraint. 1491 01:30:12,840 --> 01:30:15,390 Clearly, Abigail was at imminent risk 1492 01:30:15,390 --> 01:30:18,243 of a serious injury from the traffic, 1493 01:30:19,380 --> 01:30:21,270 and there really wasn't any other opportunity 1494 01:30:21,270 --> 01:30:23,490 to implement a less restrictive intervention 1495 01:30:23,490 --> 01:30:25,920 because of the danger that was posed. 1496 01:30:25,920 --> 01:30:27,240 This does raise a question, though, 1497 01:30:27,240 --> 01:30:30,750 that comes up not infrequently in my experience right now, 1498 01:30:30,750 --> 01:30:35,320 about what if the scenario involves a student 1499 01:30:36,900 --> 01:30:39,720 leaving the building where there is a roadway nearby 1500 01:30:39,720 --> 01:30:41,970 that sometimes has heavy traffic, 1501 01:30:41,970 --> 01:30:44,670 rather than this pretty dramatic incident 1502 01:30:44,670 --> 01:30:45,960 where this is clear. 1503 01:30:45,960 --> 01:30:48,574 I don't think anybody would disagree 1504 01:30:48,574 --> 01:30:51,074 that Abigail needed to be restrained in that moment 1505 01:30:51,074 --> 01:30:52,260 for her personal safety. 1506 01:30:52,260 --> 01:30:53,470 It becomes less clear 1507 01:30:54,330 --> 01:30:58,833 if the danger is less imminent. 1508 01:30:59,820 --> 01:31:00,840 And those are gonna have to be 1509 01:31:00,840 --> 01:31:03,180 more case-by-case circumstances. 1510 01:31:03,180 --> 01:31:05,310 It's difficult for those of us at the agency 1511 01:31:05,310 --> 01:31:08,040 who may get the information about is that a remove? 1512 01:31:08,040 --> 01:31:09,930 And aren't looking at the situation. 1513 01:31:09,930 --> 01:31:12,600 It is so hard sometimes to know for certain 1514 01:31:12,600 --> 01:31:14,250 what the correct answer would be. 1515 01:31:17,100 --> 01:31:18,850 Why don't we move to the next poll? 1516 01:31:22,140 --> 01:31:24,483 Oh, prohibited interventions. Okay. 1517 01:31:28,800 --> 01:31:31,290 So as we've discussed earlier, 1518 01:31:31,290 --> 01:31:34,740 the Vermont rules prohibit mechanical restraint, 1519 01:31:34,740 --> 01:31:36,720 and we've talked about some of the circumstances 1520 01:31:36,720 --> 01:31:40,290 where there might be mechanical devices 1521 01:31:40,290 --> 01:31:42,870 that in effect impose a restraint, 1522 01:31:42,870 --> 01:31:46,433 but they may be permissible because that restraint is 1523 01:31:46,433 --> 01:31:48,190 for medical or therapeutic reasons 1524 01:31:49,368 --> 01:31:50,250 and is prescribed, monitored, 1525 01:31:50,250 --> 01:31:52,050 and presumably implemented by somebody 1526 01:31:52,050 --> 01:31:53,793 who is trained to do that. 1527 01:31:54,930 --> 01:31:56,133 Chemical restraint. 1528 01:31:57,750 --> 01:32:00,930 This is fortunately something I have not encountered 1529 01:32:00,930 --> 01:32:02,730 in recent years. 1530 01:32:02,730 --> 01:32:06,330 I will go way back into my past experience 1531 01:32:06,330 --> 01:32:09,412 when I first started the work that I do. 1532 01:32:09,412 --> 01:32:12,933 And there were incidents where chemical restraint was used, 1533 01:32:13,920 --> 01:32:17,604 and I found that horrific at the time 1534 01:32:17,604 --> 01:32:18,437 and would continue to do so. 1535 01:32:18,437 --> 01:32:21,210 I'm not aware of anybody using chemical restraints 1536 01:32:21,210 --> 01:32:22,053 at this point. 1537 01:32:25,080 --> 01:32:27,660 Any intervention that restricts or limits breathing 1538 01:32:27,660 --> 01:32:29,790 or communication, causes pain, 1539 01:32:29,790 --> 01:32:33,333 or is imposed without maintaining direct visual contact. 1540 01:32:42,909 --> 01:32:43,742 Okay. 1541 01:32:46,890 --> 01:32:49,740 Restraints that are imposed for the convenience of staff. 1542 01:32:52,120 --> 01:32:55,110 Restraints that are a substitute for an educational program 1543 01:32:55,110 --> 01:32:56,520 or if they're a substitute 1544 01:32:56,520 --> 01:32:58,593 for inadequate staffing or training. 1545 01:33:04,980 --> 01:33:07,050 This is especially important. 1546 01:33:07,050 --> 01:33:08,850 Restraint is not allowed to be used 1547 01:33:08,850 --> 01:33:11,013 as a form of discipline or punishment. 1548 01:33:12,420 --> 01:33:14,640 It's certainly not to be used as a response 1549 01:33:14,640 --> 01:33:16,360 to student's use of disrespect 1550 01:33:17,550 --> 01:33:19,950 and not in response to a verbal threat 1551 01:33:19,950 --> 01:33:22,290 that's not accompanied by the means or intent 1552 01:33:22,290 --> 01:33:23,700 to carry out that threat. 1553 01:33:23,700 --> 01:33:27,550 It's going back to the scenario that Tracy presented earlier 1554 01:33:28,449 --> 01:33:29,282 with the high school aged student 1555 01:33:29,282 --> 01:33:30,660 who was making wild threats, 1556 01:33:30,660 --> 01:33:32,943 clearly had no ability to carry those out. 1557 01:33:37,650 --> 01:33:38,643 So our next poll. 1558 01:33:42,965 --> 01:33:45,120 The question is whether the following intervention 1559 01:33:45,120 --> 01:33:46,860 would be permissible. 1560 01:33:46,860 --> 01:33:49,200 Frankie is frequently disruptive in class. 1561 01:33:49,200 --> 01:33:52,230 He's often defiant and given instructions, 1562 01:33:52,230 --> 01:33:54,810 uses racial slurs when he gets angry. 1563 01:33:54,810 --> 01:33:55,980 The school psychologist 1564 01:33:55,980 --> 01:33:58,890 has done functional behavior assessment. 1565 01:33:58,890 --> 01:33:59,723 The team used that 1566 01:33:59,723 --> 01:34:02,583 to develop a clearly defined behavior support plan. 1567 01:34:03,450 --> 01:34:04,980 A classmate reached for a toy, 1568 01:34:04,980 --> 01:34:08,283 Frankie used an offensive term related to his peer's race. 1569 01:34:09,150 --> 01:34:12,180 Because his plan stated he's to receive a 10 minute timeout 1570 01:34:12,180 --> 01:34:15,090 in response to the use of offensive racial language, 1571 01:34:15,090 --> 01:34:18,600 his BI brought Frankie to the seclusion room, shut the door, 1572 01:34:18,600 --> 01:34:20,170 set the timer for 10 minutes 1573 01:34:21,752 --> 01:34:22,920 and monitored him through the window 1574 01:34:22,920 --> 01:34:24,600 throughout the timeout. 1575 01:34:24,600 --> 01:34:26,883 So the question is, is this permissible? 1576 01:34:28,169 --> 01:34:29,940 And if you have any thoughts about why or why not, 1577 01:34:29,940 --> 01:34:31,740 we'll give you a few seconds to think about it 1578 01:34:31,740 --> 01:34:34,863 before you send your answer in the chat. 1579 01:34:46,680 --> 01:34:48,633 Okay, go ahead. 1580 01:35:06,750 --> 01:35:11,370 It looks as though the majority of the answers are no, 1581 01:35:11,370 --> 01:35:13,200 I haven't seen any yeses yet. 1582 01:35:13,200 --> 01:35:15,090 And that is correct. 1583 01:35:15,090 --> 01:35:16,020 He was secluded. 1584 01:35:16,020 --> 01:35:18,618 This clearly was a case of seclusion 1585 01:35:18,618 --> 01:35:20,940 and it was not permissible in this case. 1586 01:35:20,940 --> 01:35:23,190 Seclusion, as well as restraint, 1587 01:35:23,190 --> 01:35:24,900 are only emergency interventions, 1588 01:35:24,900 --> 01:35:26,490 not planned interventions. 1589 01:35:26,490 --> 01:35:30,780 So it's really important not to confuse a planned timeout 1590 01:35:30,780 --> 01:35:31,833 with a seclusion. 1591 01:35:34,650 --> 01:35:38,250 Frankie was alone, he was not permitted to leave. 1592 01:35:38,250 --> 01:35:41,460 There was no imminent risk of substantial injury. 1593 01:35:41,460 --> 01:35:44,790 And had there been any, 1594 01:35:44,790 --> 01:35:47,207 they still needed to be terminated 1595 01:35:47,207 --> 01:35:49,006 as soon as the harm was no longer present. 1596 01:35:49,006 --> 01:35:51,436 So the use of the timer to dictate 1597 01:35:51,436 --> 01:35:53,070 when Frankie could leave the seclusion, 1598 01:35:53,070 --> 01:35:56,280 even if seclusion had been permissible in this case, 1599 01:35:56,280 --> 01:35:57,870 dictating the end of seclusion 1600 01:35:57,870 --> 01:35:59,853 with a timer is also not permissible. 1601 01:36:08,088 --> 01:36:10,980 And there's another question in the chat. 1602 01:36:10,980 --> 01:36:13,650 Yeah, it was going back to the question 1603 01:36:13,650 --> 01:36:15,630 about mechanical restraints. 1604 01:36:15,630 --> 01:36:20,100 So let's hold that question and come back to it at the end 1605 01:36:20,100 --> 01:36:23,231 -so that we don't- -Oh, okay. 1606 01:36:23,231 --> 01:36:24,270 -Go ahead. -There's one from Evan. 1607 01:36:24,270 --> 01:36:25,650 -It says- -Oh, sorry. 1608 01:36:25,650 --> 01:36:27,231 It's okay. 1609 01:36:27,231 --> 01:36:28,064 If it's clearly outlined 1610 01:36:28,064 --> 01:36:30,720 within the student's behavior intervention plan 1611 01:36:30,720 --> 01:36:32,700 as a timeout procedure, 1612 01:36:32,700 --> 01:36:35,253 it wouldn't be considered a seclusion? 1613 01:36:36,420 --> 01:36:38,070 Question. 1614 01:36:38,070 --> 01:36:41,460 If the student is in the room alone, the door is shut, 1615 01:36:41,460 --> 01:36:44,310 the student reasonably believes that they cannot leave, 1616 01:36:44,310 --> 01:36:46,593 then that's a seclusion, not a timeout. 1617 01:36:49,170 --> 01:36:50,003 Thank you. 1618 01:36:51,690 --> 01:36:54,270 And again, restraints and seclusions 1619 01:36:54,270 --> 01:36:57,000 are emergency interventions. 1620 01:36:57,000 --> 01:37:01,230 They are not to be used in a planned manner. 1621 01:37:01,230 --> 01:37:05,610 And I always advise teams 1622 01:37:05,610 --> 01:37:10,050 not to mention the word restraint or seclusion 1623 01:37:10,050 --> 01:37:12,873 in a child's behavior intervention plan. 1624 01:37:13,830 --> 01:37:18,420 What I would advise is that you have a behavior plan 1625 01:37:18,420 --> 01:37:23,420 that does not mention seclusion or restraint, 1626 01:37:24,456 --> 01:37:28,470 but maybe would say in the event 1627 01:37:28,470 --> 01:37:32,880 that so-and-so's behavior is posing an imminent risk 1628 01:37:32,880 --> 01:37:35,910 of substantial physical injury, 1629 01:37:35,910 --> 01:37:39,963 then Rule 4500 would be used. 1630 01:37:41,370 --> 01:37:44,640 And then I would say, 1631 01:37:44,640 --> 01:37:49,417 you can consult so-and-so's safety plan 1632 01:37:50,509 --> 01:37:55,509 or ICMP, which is Individualized Crisis Management Plan. 1633 01:37:56,820 --> 01:38:00,790 And then you might draw up a separate safety plan 1634 01:38:01,866 --> 01:38:04,200 that has unique features to that student. 1635 01:38:04,200 --> 01:38:06,483 For example, you know, 1636 01:38:07,770 --> 01:38:11,160 with Johnny restraint has been contraindicated. 1637 01:38:11,160 --> 01:38:13,563 So use seclusion instead. 1638 01:38:15,992 --> 01:38:19,530 But don't use restraints or seclusions 1639 01:38:19,530 --> 01:38:22,740 in a planned manner. 1640 01:38:22,740 --> 01:38:24,360 Right, and I'd also add 1641 01:38:24,360 --> 01:38:27,120 that not only would this be a seclusion 1642 01:38:27,120 --> 01:38:28,383 rather than a timeout, 1643 01:38:29,310 --> 01:38:30,450 there are also instances 1644 01:38:30,450 --> 01:38:32,460 where similar conditions have been imposed 1645 01:38:32,460 --> 01:38:35,036 and called in-school suspension. 1646 01:38:35,036 --> 01:38:37,590 And that is also not acceptable or accurate. 1647 01:38:37,590 --> 01:38:42,010 It's still seclusion and has to be considered as such 1648 01:38:44,431 --> 01:38:47,243 and has to follow the Rule 4500 rules. 1649 01:38:48,870 --> 01:38:50,943 Okay, the next slide. 1650 01:38:52,500 --> 01:38:55,016 Termination of interventions. 1651 01:38:55,016 --> 01:38:56,340 And that's Frankie's instance. 1652 01:38:56,340 --> 01:39:01,090 That was part of the issue was that 1653 01:39:02,241 --> 01:39:03,965 as we saw, Frankie, 1654 01:39:03,965 --> 01:39:05,850 his intervention was terminated based on a timer 1655 01:39:05,850 --> 01:39:08,820 rather than on his behavior or his needs. 1656 01:39:08,820 --> 01:39:10,293 So let's move ahead. 1657 01:39:14,621 --> 01:39:16,521 So interventions have to be terminated 1658 01:39:17,670 --> 01:39:21,333 if there is any unnecessary pain or significant distress, 1659 01:39:22,415 --> 01:39:24,780 if breathing or communication are compromised, 1660 01:39:24,780 --> 01:39:27,000 if the student no longer poses an imminent 1661 01:39:27,000 --> 01:39:29,290 and substantial danger of physical injury 1662 01:39:30,240 --> 01:39:33,723 or if less restrictive interventions would be effective. 1663 01:39:34,959 --> 01:39:37,673 And this says, think about Frankie and his behavior plan. 1664 01:39:46,890 --> 01:39:47,723 Next slide. 1665 01:39:51,120 --> 01:39:53,880 So we have another scenario, another poll. 1666 01:39:53,880 --> 01:39:54,810 And the question is 1667 01:39:54,810 --> 01:39:58,140 whether the following intervention would be permissible. 1668 01:39:58,140 --> 01:39:59,500 Jayden is an eighth grader 1669 01:40:00,585 --> 01:40:01,418 who struggles with peer relationships 1670 01:40:01,418 --> 01:40:02,880 and managing his anger. 1671 01:40:02,880 --> 01:40:04,890 During a group activity in English class, 1672 01:40:04,890 --> 01:40:07,170 a friend accidentally steps on his new shoes 1673 01:40:07,170 --> 01:40:10,350 and Jayden starts threatening to fight him, 1674 01:40:10,350 --> 01:40:11,942 throws a punch, 1675 01:40:11,942 --> 01:40:13,140 which almost lands on his English teacher, 1676 01:40:13,140 --> 01:40:14,613 and she tries to intervene. 1677 01:40:15,523 --> 01:40:16,356 Quickly calls for support, 1678 01:40:16,356 --> 01:40:18,303 clears the classroom of all other students. 1679 01:40:19,470 --> 01:40:22,230 Two behavioral interventionists who respond are now alone 1680 01:40:22,230 --> 01:40:23,520 in the classroom with Jayden, 1681 01:40:23,520 --> 01:40:25,200 who is still extremely agitated, 1682 01:40:25,200 --> 01:40:27,600 kicking at each of them as hard as he can. 1683 01:40:27,600 --> 01:40:29,580 They work to use verbal deescalation 1684 01:40:29,580 --> 01:40:31,800 and encourage him to use his breathing strategies, 1685 01:40:31,800 --> 01:40:33,630 but he's not hearing them. 1686 01:40:33,630 --> 01:40:35,220 He tries to bite one of the Bis 1687 01:40:35,220 --> 01:40:36,930 when they attempt to restrain him. 1688 01:40:36,930 --> 01:40:38,970 They determine that it's not gonna be effective 1689 01:40:38,970 --> 01:40:41,970 to use restraint, leave the classroom, close the door, 1690 01:40:41,970 --> 01:40:43,293 starting a seclusion. 1691 01:40:44,550 --> 01:40:46,460 As the adults observe through the window 1692 01:40:46,460 --> 01:40:47,670 of the classroom door, 1693 01:40:47,670 --> 01:40:50,520 Jayden slowly begins to enter a calmer state. 1694 01:40:50,520 --> 01:40:52,620 He takes some deep breaths and eventually, 1695 01:40:57,510 --> 01:40:58,953 and stops kicking the door. 1696 01:41:00,008 --> 01:41:01,500 He begins to walk around the classroom pacing. 1697 01:41:01,500 --> 01:41:02,850 He asks them to open the door 1698 01:41:02,850 --> 01:41:04,800 so he can have a drink of water. 1699 01:41:04,800 --> 01:41:08,700 The BIs state he needs to have a, quote, calm body, unquote, 1700 01:41:08,700 --> 01:41:10,920 and remains seated for at least 30 seconds 1701 01:41:10,920 --> 01:41:13,020 before they'll let him leave. 1702 01:41:13,020 --> 01:41:14,340 So the question to you, 1703 01:41:14,340 --> 01:41:17,820 is this permissible and why or why not? 1704 01:41:17,820 --> 01:41:18,840 Take a few seconds 1705 01:41:18,840 --> 01:41:21,090 and I'll cue you when to put your answers in. 1706 01:41:30,430 --> 01:41:31,623 Okay, go ahead. 1707 01:42:16,200 --> 01:42:18,600 It looks as though the majority of you answered no, 1708 01:42:18,600 --> 01:42:21,030 although there were some mixed answers. 1709 01:42:21,030 --> 01:42:22,893 So we'll move to the next slide. 1710 01:42:26,220 --> 01:42:28,770 Says, no, this use of seclusion was not permissible. 1711 01:42:28,770 --> 01:42:30,990 Jayden should have been allowed to leave the classroom 1712 01:42:30,990 --> 01:42:32,570 when he was no longer presenting a risk 1713 01:42:32,570 --> 01:42:35,220 of physical harm through his behaviors. 1714 01:42:35,220 --> 01:42:38,503 Remember that this is an emergency intervention. 1715 01:42:38,503 --> 01:42:40,710 It can only be used to prevent imminent physical harm. 1716 01:42:40,710 --> 01:42:42,000 It must end when the student 1717 01:42:42,000 --> 01:42:44,460 is no longer presenting this risk of harm 1718 01:42:44,460 --> 01:42:47,673 or if a less restrictive intervention would be effective. 1719 01:42:48,885 --> 01:42:50,461 In this particular case, 1720 01:42:50,461 --> 01:42:52,860 it appeared that while Jayden might have 1721 01:42:52,860 --> 01:42:54,720 still been somewhat agitated, 1722 01:42:54,720 --> 01:42:56,820 he wasn't presenting physical harm 1723 01:42:56,820 --> 01:43:00,060 and it seemed as though he was attempting 1724 01:43:00,060 --> 01:43:01,800 to use some of the techniques 1725 01:43:01,800 --> 01:43:05,400 that the staff had previously recommended for him. 1726 01:43:05,400 --> 01:43:07,680 So that would be an excellent opportunity 1727 01:43:07,680 --> 01:43:10,023 to use less restrictive interventions. 1728 01:43:14,506 --> 01:43:15,990 Simply because he is not continuing 1729 01:43:15,990 --> 01:43:20,583 to follow directions is not a reason to continue seclusion. 1730 01:43:23,520 --> 01:43:27,970 And requiring something such as a safe body for 30 seconds 1731 01:43:29,101 --> 01:43:32,463 is beyond what's allowable for seclusion. 1732 01:43:49,680 --> 01:43:51,578 So somebody here said, 1733 01:43:51,578 --> 01:43:52,411 you really have to know your student 1734 01:43:52,411 --> 01:43:54,600 and their patterns and behavior. 1735 01:43:54,600 --> 01:43:56,790 And I would fully agree with that. 1736 01:43:56,790 --> 01:43:57,810 I think this is something 1737 01:43:57,810 --> 01:44:00,540 that we haven't been exploring too much 1738 01:44:00,540 --> 01:44:01,680 with this whole discussion, 1739 01:44:01,680 --> 01:44:06,680 but that these situations 1740 01:44:07,470 --> 01:44:09,990 don't take place just in isolation 1741 01:44:09,990 --> 01:44:14,990 and they aren't simply done and over with 1742 01:44:15,031 --> 01:44:16,833 once it's happened. 1743 01:44:17,730 --> 01:44:20,860 Something we haven't talked about yet is 1744 01:44:21,934 --> 01:44:24,990 that each of these interventions also needs 1745 01:44:24,990 --> 01:44:26,170 to be an opportunity 1746 01:44:27,376 --> 01:44:29,400 to really examine the student situation more 1747 01:44:29,400 --> 01:44:31,050 and come to a better understanding 1748 01:44:31,050 --> 01:44:32,950 of what's happening with that student. 1749 01:44:35,109 --> 01:44:37,080 One of the saddest things that I can see is, 1750 01:44:37,080 --> 01:44:41,757 is if I'm seeing repeated reports of seclusions 1751 01:44:42,990 --> 01:44:45,033 or restraints of students coming in. 1752 01:44:46,710 --> 01:44:48,870 And there just doesn't seem to be significant change 1753 01:44:48,870 --> 01:44:50,760 in the behavior over time. 1754 01:44:50,760 --> 01:44:53,343 If you're having repeated episodes, 1755 01:44:54,427 --> 01:44:56,790 if this is just an ongoing set of issues, 1756 01:44:56,790 --> 01:44:59,280 you have to use that as an opportunity 1757 01:44:59,280 --> 01:45:02,730 to really look at a functional behavior assessment 1758 01:45:02,730 --> 01:45:04,410 and really try to determine 1759 01:45:04,410 --> 01:45:06,240 what are you going to do differently? 1760 01:45:06,240 --> 01:45:09,540 This shouldn't just be a regular occurrence. 1761 01:45:09,540 --> 01:45:11,890 This should be something that's part of a plan, 1762 01:45:12,827 --> 01:45:15,570 that if it is happening more than once, 1763 01:45:15,570 --> 01:45:18,240 what is the plan to decrease the frequency 1764 01:45:18,240 --> 01:45:20,013 or eliminate it all together? 1765 01:45:24,150 --> 01:45:25,643 All right, I'll move along. 1766 01:45:28,603 --> 01:45:31,323 There are a few questions in the chat as well. 1767 01:45:35,251 --> 01:45:36,300 Yeah, what I wanted to say is 1768 01:45:36,300 --> 01:45:39,670 that we're nearing the 10-minute mark 1769 01:45:42,365 --> 01:45:44,250 when this webinar is scheduled to end. 1770 01:45:44,250 --> 01:45:48,900 So I'm willing to stay on after 11:00 1771 01:45:48,900 --> 01:45:51,690 to answer and discuss additional questions. 1772 01:45:51,690 --> 01:45:53,800 But I think it would be best 1773 01:45:57,210 --> 01:46:02,210 to continue so that we can cover all of the content, 1774 01:46:02,490 --> 01:46:04,410 which we're almost done with. 1775 01:46:04,410 --> 01:46:05,243 Yep. 1776 01:46:08,057 --> 01:46:10,770 Okay, next, briefly, context of COVID. 1777 01:46:10,770 --> 01:46:13,020 This was originally part of the slide 1778 01:46:13,020 --> 01:46:15,280 when there were more formal 1779 01:46:18,395 --> 01:46:19,577 considerations in place 1780 01:46:19,577 --> 01:46:21,270 as a result of the COVID pandemic, 1781 01:46:21,270 --> 01:46:24,020 but it's important to note that COVID hasn't gone away. 1782 01:46:25,720 --> 01:46:27,670 That this is still an issue in schools. 1783 01:46:29,274 --> 01:46:31,170 This slide just gives a brief history 1784 01:46:31,170 --> 01:46:34,230 of some of the exceptions to the rule 1785 01:46:34,230 --> 01:46:37,260 that were permitted during the height of the pandemic. 1786 01:46:37,260 --> 01:46:41,760 Fall of 2020 there were exceptions allowing seclusion 1787 01:46:41,760 --> 01:46:44,880 instead of restraint in order to mitigate the risk 1788 01:46:44,880 --> 01:46:46,443 of infection spreading. 1789 01:46:49,200 --> 01:46:52,950 In 2021, some of those rules became modified 1790 01:46:52,950 --> 01:46:56,910 depending on the eligibility of students for the vaccine, 1791 01:46:56,910 --> 01:47:00,270 acknowledging that depending on a student's age, 1792 01:47:00,270 --> 01:47:03,510 they might be at greater risk due to the lack 1793 01:47:03,510 --> 01:47:06,000 of not being able to access the vaccine. 1794 01:47:06,000 --> 01:47:09,030 And then finally, as of fall 2022, 1795 01:47:09,030 --> 01:47:11,610 the formal COVID considerations have been removed. 1796 01:47:11,610 --> 01:47:16,110 So the rule is back in force 1797 01:47:16,110 --> 01:47:18,449 as previously stated. 1798 01:47:18,449 --> 01:47:22,320 So just in case anybody had been using 1799 01:47:23,370 --> 01:47:26,070 any of the exceptions that had previously been in place, 1800 01:47:26,070 --> 01:47:29,790 you need to know that those went away in the fall of 2022. 1801 01:47:29,790 --> 01:47:32,640 And I don't anticipate any changes 1802 01:47:32,640 --> 01:47:35,400 despite the fact that COVID is still an issue in schools 1803 01:47:35,400 --> 01:47:38,000 and something that schools need to be talking about. 1804 01:47:42,336 --> 01:47:45,210 So following the termination of an intervention. 1805 01:47:45,210 --> 01:47:47,910 The rule requires that a student be evaluated and monitored 1806 01:47:47,910 --> 01:47:50,461 for the remainder of the school day. 1807 01:47:50,461 --> 01:47:54,210 It's also important to note that this needs to be conducted 1808 01:47:54,210 --> 01:47:57,420 by someone who is not involved in the intervention. 1809 01:47:57,420 --> 01:48:00,960 That is also a not infrequent area of violation 1810 01:48:00,960 --> 01:48:04,080 where somebody who is involved in intervention 1811 01:48:04,080 --> 01:48:06,000 later assess the student. 1812 01:48:06,000 --> 01:48:10,083 That's largely to remove any potential conflict of interest. 1813 01:48:10,980 --> 01:48:15,980 The question of, you know, I think it'd be a risk 1814 01:48:16,110 --> 01:48:19,290 that somebody might minimize the impact 1815 01:48:19,290 --> 01:48:21,540 of an intervention on a student if they had been involved 1816 01:48:21,540 --> 01:48:23,193 in imposing that intervention. 1817 01:48:24,840 --> 01:48:26,340 And any injury that resulted 1818 01:48:26,340 --> 01:48:29,190 from the intervention must be documented. 1819 01:48:29,190 --> 01:48:31,230 That includes injury to staff. 1820 01:48:31,230 --> 01:48:34,560 And in our experience most frequently staff are the ones 1821 01:48:34,560 --> 01:48:36,650 who are most likely to experience injuries 1822 01:48:36,650 --> 01:48:37,953 in these processes. 1823 01:48:39,360 --> 01:48:40,740 I just wanted to interject 1824 01:48:40,740 --> 01:48:44,730 that the evaluation 1825 01:48:44,730 --> 01:48:46,890 following the restraint has to be done 1826 01:48:46,890 --> 01:48:49,720 by someone that wasn't involved. 1827 01:48:49,720 --> 01:48:51,570 But then the monitoring for the rest of the day, 1828 01:48:51,570 --> 01:48:56,040 that can happen by someone who was involved. 1829 01:48:56,040 --> 01:48:57,437 Right. 1830 01:48:57,437 --> 01:49:00,420 Typically there might be a BI involved who's, 1831 01:49:00,420 --> 01:49:03,030 it would just make sense for that person to be monitoring 1832 01:49:03,030 --> 01:49:04,780 the student for the end of the day. 1833 01:49:08,100 --> 01:49:09,573 So in terms of reporting, 1834 01:49:10,610 --> 01:49:12,930 the school administrator needs to be informed 1835 01:49:12,930 --> 01:49:14,880 no later than the end of the school day 1836 01:49:14,880 --> 01:49:17,230 in which a restraint or seclusion has occurred. 1837 01:49:21,694 --> 01:49:25,170 Parents, there has to be at least a documented attempt 1838 01:49:25,170 --> 01:49:28,740 to provide notice verbally or electronically 1839 01:49:28,740 --> 01:49:30,750 to parents as soon as possible, 1840 01:49:30,750 --> 01:49:32,040 no later than the school day 1841 01:49:32,040 --> 01:49:34,740 in which the intervention occurred. 1842 01:49:34,740 --> 01:49:38,520 And written notice within 24 hours of the intervention. 1843 01:49:38,520 --> 01:49:40,830 And the written notice has to include an invitation 1844 01:49:40,830 --> 01:49:43,088 for the parents to participate 1845 01:49:43,088 --> 01:49:44,763 in a debriefing of the incident. 1846 01:49:48,090 --> 01:49:49,800 The superintendent has to be notified 1847 01:49:49,800 --> 01:49:51,210 within three school days 1848 01:49:51,210 --> 01:49:54,750 if there has been any death, injury or hospitalization 1849 01:49:54,750 --> 01:49:56,910 as a result of the incident. 1850 01:49:56,910 --> 01:49:59,440 If an individual staff member 1851 01:50:00,390 --> 01:50:02,910 has used restraint or seclusion 1852 01:50:02,910 --> 01:50:05,433 three separate times on one or more students, 1853 01:50:06,630 --> 01:50:09,420 if the interventions, either restraint or seclusion, 1854 01:50:09,420 --> 01:50:11,553 have lasted more than 15 minutes, 1855 01:50:13,479 --> 01:50:14,520 if a student's been restrained or secluded 1856 01:50:14,520 --> 01:50:16,630 three or more times in the school year 1857 01:50:18,843 --> 01:50:20,280 or have been restrained or secluded more than once 1858 01:50:20,280 --> 01:50:23,850 in a school day or if there have been any violations 1859 01:50:23,850 --> 01:50:25,050 of the use of the rules. 1860 01:50:28,519 --> 01:50:31,776 And then finally, a report to the AOE. 1861 01:50:31,776 --> 01:50:33,503 And these are the reports that I see. 1862 01:50:34,974 --> 01:50:35,940 That if there's death or injury 1863 01:50:35,940 --> 01:50:38,223 that required outside medical intervention, 1864 01:50:39,570 --> 01:50:41,520 if the restraint or seclusion lasted 1865 01:50:41,520 --> 01:50:43,200 for more than 30 minutes 1866 01:50:43,200 --> 01:50:45,450 or if there have been violations of the rule. 1867 01:50:48,840 --> 01:50:52,770 There's a new reporting form that became available 1868 01:50:52,770 --> 01:50:54,540 at the beginning of last school year 1869 01:50:54,540 --> 01:50:57,420 and is still available for incidents 1870 01:50:57,420 --> 01:51:00,450 that meet criteria for reporting to the AOE. 1871 01:51:00,450 --> 01:51:02,440 There's an online link available 1872 01:51:03,555 --> 01:51:05,103 on the state webpage for use, 1873 01:51:05,940 --> 01:51:08,880 and superintendents have been notified about this. 1874 01:51:08,880 --> 01:51:11,670 And this allows us somewhat better data collection 1875 01:51:11,670 --> 01:51:14,250 and analysis so that we can offer better support 1876 01:51:14,250 --> 01:51:15,360 to folks in the field 1877 01:51:15,360 --> 01:51:18,540 and examine trends of incidents and restraints, seclusion. 1878 01:51:18,540 --> 01:51:22,620 I will point out though that, as previously stated, 1879 01:51:22,620 --> 01:51:26,010 the criteria for reporting to the AOE limit the number 1880 01:51:26,010 --> 01:51:27,190 of reports that we get 1881 01:51:28,172 --> 01:51:31,440 and therefore limits the usefulness 1882 01:51:31,440 --> 01:51:33,600 for this as a real source of data 1883 01:51:33,600 --> 01:51:36,150 about restraint and seclusion overall in the state. 1884 01:51:37,950 --> 01:51:41,790 To that end, we do have a form that's been or will be, 1885 01:51:41,790 --> 01:51:43,080 I'm not sure where it is right now, 1886 01:51:43,080 --> 01:51:45,690 in the pipeline going out to principles 1887 01:51:45,690 --> 01:51:49,320 just to give us a half school year report 1888 01:51:49,320 --> 01:51:51,390 on all incidents of restraint and seclusion, 1889 01:51:51,390 --> 01:51:56,070 just so that we can have just a quick understanding 1890 01:51:56,070 --> 01:51:59,160 of the how frequently these interventions are taking place. 1891 01:51:59,160 --> 01:52:01,080 'Cause our current system doesn't really give us 1892 01:52:01,080 --> 01:52:02,130 a good sense of that. 1893 01:52:05,370 --> 01:52:07,143 So now comments and questions. 1894 01:52:11,370 --> 01:52:13,140 -And, I also- -So this is. 1895 01:52:13,140 --> 01:52:15,960 I was just gonna say, Tracy, really quickly, 1896 01:52:15,960 --> 01:52:17,490 I know it's almost time, 1897 01:52:17,490 --> 01:52:21,750 so feel free to stay on if you have additional questions. 1898 01:52:21,750 --> 01:52:23,640 We have about five minutes in the formal part 1899 01:52:23,640 --> 01:52:24,960 of this presentation. 1900 01:52:24,960 --> 01:52:26,190 If you do have to leave, 1901 01:52:26,190 --> 01:52:28,290 thank you so much for joining us this morning. 1902 01:52:28,290 --> 01:52:30,900 A huge shout out to Tom and Tracy. 1903 01:52:30,900 --> 01:52:32,490 Really appreciate all the knowledge 1904 01:52:32,490 --> 01:52:34,020 that you've shared with us this morning 1905 01:52:34,020 --> 01:52:36,660 and your willingness to answer questions. 1906 01:52:36,660 --> 01:52:40,380 You will also, for attending today, receive a certificate 1907 01:52:40,380 --> 01:52:42,000 of attendance and a survey. 1908 01:52:42,000 --> 01:52:45,030 So please let us know how this went for you today 1909 01:52:45,030 --> 01:52:49,080 and certainly look forward to seeing you at a future event. 1910 01:52:49,080 --> 01:52:51,372 And now I will go ahead 1911 01:52:51,372 --> 01:52:53,493 and open it up for additional questions. 1912 01:52:54,690 --> 01:52:57,213 And there are a lot in the chat box.I, 1913 01:52:58,170 --> 01:53:01,893 I'm gonna have to scroll back because a lot have come up.