1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,340 To welcome you to tonight's webinar 2 00:00:02,340 --> 00:00:05,343 about maple quality in the marketplace today. 3 00:00:06,780 --> 00:00:08,190 Folks will be trickling in a little bit, 4 00:00:08,190 --> 00:00:11,670 but we're gonna just keep charging right ahead 5 00:00:11,670 --> 00:00:14,583 and get started with the webinar. 6 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,960 Mark Canella is going to be watching the chat, 7 00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:20,340 so if there are questions, 8 00:00:20,340 --> 00:00:23,340 especially technical things that are making it difficult 9 00:00:23,340 --> 00:00:27,660 to enjoy the presentation, please pop those in the chat. 10 00:00:27,660 --> 00:00:31,590 Also, if you're interested in signing up for more, 11 00:00:31,590 --> 00:00:33,426 there's three more in this series, 12 00:00:33,426 --> 00:00:38,426 and the next one will be on SAP business finance. 13 00:00:39,750 --> 00:00:43,290 Make sure that you register for the upcoming webinar. 14 00:00:43,290 --> 00:00:45,090 It's 48 hours in advance, 15 00:00:45,090 --> 00:00:46,830 so it closes at the end of the day 16 00:00:46,830 --> 00:00:48,903 on the Monday before the webinar. 17 00:00:50,430 --> 00:00:53,370 If you have questions, feel free to pop them in the chat. 18 00:00:53,370 --> 00:00:56,040 Mark will interrupt if they're timely 19 00:00:56,040 --> 00:00:57,480 and need to be asked right away. 20 00:00:57,480 --> 00:01:00,180 Otherwise, we can do some Q&A at the end. 21 00:01:00,180 --> 00:01:02,220 And without further ado, 22 00:01:02,220 --> 00:01:03,840 I appreciate everyone showing up, 23 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:05,490 and we'll get started. 24 00:01:05,490 --> 00:01:07,110 So just to give you a little background 25 00:01:07,110 --> 00:01:09,510 on what we're gonna be talking about, 26 00:01:09,510 --> 00:01:12,930 this is a project that was funded again 27 00:01:12,930 --> 00:01:15,540 through an (indistinct) Access Project. 28 00:01:15,540 --> 00:01:17,490 And Mark and I, 29 00:01:17,490 --> 00:01:20,580 Mark Cannella and I wrote this section of the grant 30 00:01:20,580 --> 00:01:22,489 to kind of look at what is the status 31 00:01:22,489 --> 00:01:25,710 of maple syrup quality in the marketplace. 32 00:01:25,710 --> 00:01:29,940 And specifically we wanted to do online purchases. 33 00:01:29,940 --> 00:01:32,400 We wanted to see really just the basics. 34 00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:35,490 How much of the syrup that you order online 35 00:01:35,490 --> 00:01:37,440 meet the basic standards 36 00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:40,770 for color, clarity, density, and flavor? 37 00:01:40,770 --> 00:01:42,960 And then there's some secondary topics 38 00:01:42,960 --> 00:01:44,250 that we are curious about. 39 00:01:44,250 --> 00:01:47,839 Trends as far as how packaging was done, 40 00:01:47,839 --> 00:01:51,060 container types, and shipping. 41 00:01:51,060 --> 00:01:52,680 Tonight we're just gonna be focusing 42 00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:54,540 on the syrup quality aspect, 43 00:01:54,540 --> 00:01:56,640 but stay tuned for more information 44 00:01:56,640 --> 00:01:58,230 about what we're learning 45 00:01:58,230 --> 00:02:02,250 in terms of shipping costs, container types, 46 00:02:02,250 --> 00:02:05,430 and really just the nature of how sugar makers 47 00:02:05,430 --> 00:02:07,743 have chosen to ship this product. 48 00:02:09,900 --> 00:02:11,220 So really what we're talking about 49 00:02:11,220 --> 00:02:13,590 are color, clarity, density, and flavor. 50 00:02:13,590 --> 00:02:16,620 Those are the fundamental basics of grading maple syrup. 51 00:02:16,620 --> 00:02:21,158 They relate to specific regulations and laws 52 00:02:21,158 --> 00:02:24,000 across the the maple region, 53 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:27,510 and they are written down, 54 00:02:27,510 --> 00:02:31,710 and they're something that no matter what size producer, 55 00:02:31,710 --> 00:02:33,966 if you're choosing to sell it in the marketplace, 56 00:02:33,966 --> 00:02:36,150 you have to meet the minimum standards 57 00:02:36,150 --> 00:02:37,923 in these four key areas. 58 00:02:39,300 --> 00:02:41,070 What is important to remember though, 59 00:02:41,070 --> 00:02:42,750 is that some of these basic, 60 00:02:42,750 --> 00:02:46,470 some of these regulations have a very quantitative measure 61 00:02:46,470 --> 00:02:49,320 and others are a little bit more subjective 62 00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:51,270 or a little harder to measure. 63 00:02:51,270 --> 00:02:52,957 I think we can all agree that flavor 64 00:02:52,957 --> 00:02:55,401 is not something that's easily measured 65 00:02:55,401 --> 00:02:57,330 in a quantitative way, 66 00:02:57,330 --> 00:02:58,500 but things like density, 67 00:02:58,500 --> 00:03:01,350 we have instrumentation to do that, color. 68 00:03:01,350 --> 00:03:03,873 Typically we'll use a color comparator. 69 00:03:04,710 --> 00:03:06,240 And clarity is one of those ones 70 00:03:06,240 --> 00:03:10,203 that's not really written down in a quantitative way. 71 00:03:12,150 --> 00:03:14,430 The regulations can be sometimes hard to find, 72 00:03:14,430 --> 00:03:16,710 so if I've compiled some of them 73 00:03:16,710 --> 00:03:19,860 on the UVM Extension Maple page, you can go to that. 74 00:03:19,860 --> 00:03:23,130 It's a sidebar at that regular maple page. 75 00:03:23,130 --> 00:03:27,480 Just search for UVN Extension Maple and you'll get our site. 76 00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:28,680 And it's important to realize 77 00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:31,191 that there are both state and federal regulations. 78 00:03:31,191 --> 00:03:33,840 If you're tuning in from Canada, 79 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:36,003 provincial and federal regulations, 80 00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:38,310 for almost 10 years now 81 00:03:38,310 --> 00:03:40,350 since the harmonization of the grades. 82 00:03:40,350 --> 00:03:42,570 So they're a little less confusing 83 00:03:42,570 --> 00:03:44,580 than maybe they were before, 84 00:03:44,580 --> 00:03:47,610 but you'll see from the results of our work 85 00:03:47,610 --> 00:03:50,880 that producers still struggle in some places 86 00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:53,280 to meet these standards. 87 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:56,010 So I really encourage everyone to refresh your memory 88 00:03:56,010 --> 00:03:58,380 about what the regulations actually say, 89 00:03:58,380 --> 00:04:01,440 how they relate to the products that you're marketing, 90 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:02,490 and just to make sure 91 00:04:02,490 --> 00:04:04,863 that you're meeting those minimum standards. 92 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:09,930 And it's not just us looking into this. 93 00:04:09,930 --> 00:04:12,600 The Agency of Ag in the state of Vermont 94 00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:16,980 has been doing retail inspections for a few years now. 95 00:04:16,980 --> 00:04:19,890 Essentially what it is inspector 96 00:04:19,890 --> 00:04:23,250 for the consumer protection section of the Agency of Ag 97 00:04:23,250 --> 00:04:25,290 will go into a retail marketplace, 98 00:04:25,290 --> 00:04:27,630 identify that maples being sold, 99 00:04:27,630 --> 00:04:30,510 check a certain number of containers 100 00:04:30,510 --> 00:04:32,430 and really grade them for the basics, 101 00:04:32,430 --> 00:04:34,770 color, clarity, flavor and density. 102 00:04:34,770 --> 00:04:38,640 It's not anything more complicated than that. 103 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:42,240 And we're finding as a result of these inspections 104 00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:45,000 that issues are coming up, 105 00:04:45,000 --> 00:04:48,647 and you can read more about it on the agency website. 106 00:04:48,647 --> 00:04:51,900 They post the results of these inspections. 107 00:04:51,900 --> 00:04:56,450 But just realize that this is part of making sure 108 00:04:56,450 --> 00:04:59,610 that consumers are getting what they are paying for. 109 00:04:59,610 --> 00:05:01,800 And Maple is a high quality product 110 00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:05,975 that derives a lot of its value from the purity 111 00:05:05,975 --> 00:05:09,360 and the high quality of the product. 112 00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:10,680 And if there are defects, 113 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:13,920 it's less likely that you're gonna have a repeat customer 114 00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:16,090 and it's entirely possible that consumers 115 00:05:16,090 --> 00:05:19,980 will find something else to use for sweetener 116 00:05:19,980 --> 00:05:21,873 if they have repeated problems. 117 00:05:22,830 --> 00:05:26,760 So unfortunately, the agency has found defects. 118 00:05:26,760 --> 00:05:30,150 Color tends to be the most common defect. 119 00:05:30,150 --> 00:05:33,600 Syrup that is graded as a lighter grade. 120 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:35,850 So when the inspector goes and tests 121 00:05:35,850 --> 00:05:37,980 that it's actually too dark for the grade, 122 00:05:37,980 --> 00:05:41,343 and would fall out of the standard. 123 00:05:42,630 --> 00:05:44,130 So that's 2021. 124 00:05:44,130 --> 00:05:46,170 We won't go too deep into those results, 125 00:05:46,170 --> 00:05:48,744 but the work continues. 126 00:05:48,744 --> 00:05:50,190 This is actually... 127 00:05:50,190 --> 00:05:51,270 I should have changed the title. 128 00:05:51,270 --> 00:05:53,460 It is 2022 results. 129 00:05:53,460 --> 00:05:55,113 Continuing to be an issue. 130 00:05:56,460 --> 00:06:00,060 And actually perhaps 2022 was worse than 2021. 131 00:06:00,060 --> 00:06:05,060 There's close to 40% of all samples 132 00:06:06,921 --> 00:06:11,921 or just over 40% of all samples were out of compliance. 133 00:06:12,056 --> 00:06:17,056 And color continues to be the number one issue of defect. 134 00:06:19,860 --> 00:06:24,060 And as you can see, both years, 2021, 2022, 135 00:06:24,060 --> 00:06:25,590 these inspections are done 136 00:06:25,590 --> 00:06:28,748 between January and June of the year, 137 00:06:28,748 --> 00:06:31,200 and presumably that is syrup 138 00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:34,080 that was packaged and produced the year before, 139 00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:36,030 but the inspector has no way of knowing 140 00:06:36,030 --> 00:06:39,630 how or when that syrup was packaged. 141 00:06:39,630 --> 00:06:41,887 It's a bit of an oddity about these rules 142 00:06:41,887 --> 00:06:46,260 in that it's the producer's name on the package 143 00:06:46,260 --> 00:06:49,650 who's responsible for the product to meet the standard, 144 00:06:49,650 --> 00:06:54,300 not the store owner, not the distributor. 145 00:06:54,300 --> 00:06:56,520 It's really the producer's name on there. 146 00:06:56,520 --> 00:06:59,280 And that can be a challenge for the producer 147 00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:03,420 if the retailer is not cycling their product quick enough. 148 00:07:03,420 --> 00:07:06,570 So it does seem a little odd that a producer 149 00:07:06,570 --> 00:07:10,140 might indefinitely have to expect their syrup 150 00:07:10,140 --> 00:07:11,550 to meet the standard, 151 00:07:11,550 --> 00:07:13,980 even if when they delivered it, it was fine, 152 00:07:13,980 --> 00:07:16,230 and in a reasonable amount of time, 153 00:07:16,230 --> 00:07:18,273 it would've been still in grade. 154 00:07:19,170 --> 00:07:23,460 With color especially, that is a bit of a challenge. 155 00:07:23,460 --> 00:07:27,420 2022, the state also identified some issues 156 00:07:27,420 --> 00:07:30,990 with lead, with mold, buddy and metallic off flavor. 157 00:07:30,990 --> 00:07:32,940 So it's not just color. 158 00:07:32,940 --> 00:07:35,640 There are other issues found as well. 159 00:07:35,640 --> 00:07:38,677 [Mark] Question come in from Meg for you, Mark. 160 00:07:38,677 --> 00:07:40,710 "How often would you recommend testing samples 161 00:07:40,710 --> 00:07:43,800 from your inventory to double check color?" 162 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:44,633 Right. 163 00:07:44,633 --> 00:07:45,693 That's a great question. 164 00:07:46,590 --> 00:07:47,580 So we know, 165 00:07:47,580 --> 00:07:49,950 and I'll get into the research a little bit later, 166 00:07:49,950 --> 00:07:50,790 but we do know 167 00:07:50,790 --> 00:07:53,460 that there's a fairly steady rate of darkening 168 00:07:53,460 --> 00:07:55,290 in plastic containers. 169 00:07:55,290 --> 00:07:56,280 We don't have great data 170 00:07:56,280 --> 00:07:59,211 on the darkening in glass containers 171 00:07:59,211 --> 00:08:02,810 or honestly, darkening in barrels, 172 00:08:02,810 --> 00:08:05,070 so it really depends. 173 00:08:05,070 --> 00:08:09,030 With plastic, the rate is fairly well known. 174 00:08:09,030 --> 00:08:11,523 It's just over 2% per month, 175 00:08:12,540 --> 00:08:17,520 2% light transmittance per month in plastic that is uncoated 176 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:22,050 and it's about a little less than half of that 177 00:08:22,050 --> 00:08:23,370 in coated containers. 178 00:08:23,370 --> 00:08:26,823 But I'll go over that data in a little bit. 179 00:08:28,020 --> 00:08:31,150 Another issue that comes up in Vermont 180 00:08:32,010 --> 00:08:35,280 is the issue of labeling, 181 00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:37,770 but also labeling with a batch code. 182 00:08:37,770 --> 00:08:41,130 The Vermont maple regulations require 183 00:08:41,130 --> 00:08:43,050 that a producer has a batch code, 184 00:08:43,050 --> 00:08:46,080 a way of identifying a particular batch of syrup 185 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:47,580 from all others. 186 00:08:47,580 --> 00:08:49,800 And I think that's information 187 00:08:49,800 --> 00:08:52,770 that really hasn't gotten widely absorbed 188 00:08:52,770 --> 00:08:54,750 by the maple industry. 189 00:08:54,750 --> 00:08:58,598 So the inspectors are continuing to find 190 00:08:58,598 --> 00:09:01,860 that issue with labeling and lack of batch code. 191 00:09:01,860 --> 00:09:04,143 So trying to spread the word about that. 192 00:09:05,640 --> 00:09:10,200 The other issue that is perhaps unique to Vermont 193 00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:13,950 is that the expectation from the agency 194 00:09:13,950 --> 00:09:17,040 is that when syrup is purchased in Vermont, 195 00:09:17,040 --> 00:09:18,960 it meet Vermont standards. 196 00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:23,960 So this is directly relevant to the project 197 00:09:23,970 --> 00:09:25,410 we're about to talk about 198 00:09:25,410 --> 00:09:27,930 in that if you sell syrup into the state of Vermont, 199 00:09:27,930 --> 00:09:30,720 it needs to meet those minimum standards. 200 00:09:30,720 --> 00:09:33,210 It just so happens that the minimum standards in Vermont 201 00:09:33,210 --> 00:09:35,940 for density are higher than all other, 202 00:09:35,940 --> 00:09:39,030 at least virtually, all other states and provinces. 203 00:09:39,030 --> 00:09:43,389 So it is something that needs to be contemplated 204 00:09:43,389 --> 00:09:46,560 when you're selling syrup into the state of Vermont. 205 00:09:46,560 --> 00:09:49,140 The color breakdown, the ranges for color 206 00:09:49,140 --> 00:09:51,930 in the four grades of syrup remain the same 207 00:09:51,930 --> 00:09:54,423 across all states and provinces however. 208 00:09:57,180 --> 00:09:58,805 One last bit of information 209 00:09:58,805 --> 00:10:02,100 before we get into the data and the methods 210 00:10:02,100 --> 00:10:04,170 is maple contest judging. 211 00:10:04,170 --> 00:10:05,850 It's something that I'm able to do 212 00:10:05,850 --> 00:10:08,250 as part of my job as maple specialist. 213 00:10:08,250 --> 00:10:10,470 Last year, excuse me, 214 00:10:10,470 --> 00:10:14,670 I helped with five different maple contests. 215 00:10:14,670 --> 00:10:19,670 These are generally held with the county maple organization, 216 00:10:21,840 --> 00:10:25,171 especially those that have a volunteer sugar house 217 00:10:25,171 --> 00:10:26,451 at a county fair. 218 00:10:26,451 --> 00:10:30,147 So Orange County, Caledonia, Orleans, Lamoille, 219 00:10:30,147 --> 00:10:32,670 and Chittenden County all have sugar houses 220 00:10:32,670 --> 00:10:36,450 at their county fair and they have a maple contest there. 221 00:10:36,450 --> 00:10:39,270 And as you can see, the rate of rejection 222 00:10:39,270 --> 00:10:42,690 ranged from 25% in Orange, 223 00:10:42,690 --> 00:10:46,530 to as high as 66% in Chittenden County. 224 00:10:46,530 --> 00:10:48,345 Relatively small sample sizes 225 00:10:48,345 --> 00:10:52,200 the most being in Orange with 28 total 226 00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:54,273 and the fewest in Lamoille with nine. 227 00:10:55,860 --> 00:10:57,000 All of those contests, 228 00:10:57,000 --> 00:11:00,390 the most common rejection was for color, 229 00:11:00,390 --> 00:11:01,770 too dark for the grade. 230 00:11:01,770 --> 00:11:04,560 And here you see an an example of syrup 231 00:11:04,560 --> 00:11:07,920 that was entered into the golden delicate category, 232 00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:10,410 the standard from the grade kits in the middle, 233 00:11:10,410 --> 00:11:12,993 and then both the sample jar 234 00:11:12,993 --> 00:11:16,800 and then the majority of the sample that was entered 235 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:17,670 is on the right. 236 00:11:17,670 --> 00:11:20,280 So very much too dark. 237 00:11:20,280 --> 00:11:23,460 And unfortunately it continued again. 238 00:11:23,460 --> 00:11:25,410 It's an issue 2022. 239 00:11:25,410 --> 00:11:27,270 I've done three this year. 240 00:11:27,270 --> 00:11:31,800 The Maple Festival in St. Albans, 49% rejection. 241 00:11:31,800 --> 00:11:35,850 Chittenden County, it was quite high, 62. 242 00:11:35,850 --> 00:11:39,349 And Orleans, which actually just happened today, 243 00:11:39,349 --> 00:11:42,154 was 52.5% rejection. 244 00:11:42,154 --> 00:11:44,250 And it could be... 245 00:11:44,250 --> 00:11:45,960 Color is definitely a very common. 246 00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:47,670 We saw issues with density. 247 00:11:47,670 --> 00:11:50,370 And this sample here had an issue with clarity 248 00:11:50,370 --> 00:11:53,493 with something floating in that sample that was entered. 249 00:11:54,810 --> 00:11:57,750 If I could give just one simple bit of information 250 00:11:57,750 --> 00:12:00,930 or guidance to anyone entering a contest, well, two, 251 00:12:00,930 --> 00:12:03,390 one would be definitely enter a contest. 252 00:12:03,390 --> 00:12:05,200 It's a very cheap way 253 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:08,610 of checking your quality of your product. 254 00:12:08,610 --> 00:12:11,520 You have unbiased judges who are trained 255 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:14,580 to judge on the basics, 256 00:12:14,580 --> 00:12:17,190 and they're gonna give you honest feedback 257 00:12:17,190 --> 00:12:18,659 on what your syrup is. 258 00:12:18,659 --> 00:12:20,340 So it's a really good idea 259 00:12:20,340 --> 00:12:23,190 to enter as many contests as you can. 260 00:12:23,190 --> 00:12:25,500 And then the other is always check your sample 261 00:12:25,500 --> 00:12:26,970 before you enter. 262 00:12:26,970 --> 00:12:28,770 It doesn't have to be hot packed 263 00:12:28,770 --> 00:12:30,050 when it's entered into the contest, 264 00:12:30,050 --> 00:12:33,960 it just has to meet the standard when the judges judge it. 265 00:12:33,960 --> 00:12:36,450 So find out when the judging will happen, 266 00:12:36,450 --> 00:12:38,153 enter it right then, 267 00:12:38,153 --> 00:12:42,183 and you'll have the best chance at not getting rejected. 268 00:12:43,740 --> 00:12:46,854 Okay, so the methods for this project 269 00:12:46,854 --> 00:12:50,697 were to order samples of golden delicate syrup 270 00:12:50,697 --> 00:12:52,620 and dark robust syrup. 271 00:12:52,620 --> 00:12:54,990 And the way Mark and I handled this 272 00:12:54,990 --> 00:12:57,990 was ordering from two separate locations 273 00:12:57,990 --> 00:13:00,120 using the same search terms 274 00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:03,330 and we wanted to make sure we could get 275 00:13:03,330 --> 00:13:06,364 a pint of both samples 276 00:13:06,364 --> 00:13:09,243 so we had enough to run it with a hydrometer. 277 00:13:10,380 --> 00:13:14,974 Obviously the way search websites work, 278 00:13:14,974 --> 00:13:19,060 they're gonna have a slightly different mix of results, 279 00:13:21,540 --> 00:13:26,540 but in general, we ordered samples from the highest, 280 00:13:28,230 --> 00:13:29,940 the ones at the top of the list 281 00:13:29,940 --> 00:13:32,043 until we filled our quota for samples 282 00:13:32,043 --> 00:13:33,720 that we needed to order. 283 00:13:33,720 --> 00:13:36,510 We ordered three of each so we had some replications 284 00:13:36,510 --> 00:13:39,924 so we would feel confident about those statistics 285 00:13:39,924 --> 00:13:41,583 when we analyzed them. 286 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:49,380 So a total, as I said, six pints, 287 00:13:49,380 --> 00:13:51,930 two from each individual's market, 288 00:13:51,930 --> 00:13:55,110 and I both ordered separately for both golden and dark. 289 00:13:55,110 --> 00:13:57,960 And then there were also some unique things 290 00:13:57,960 --> 00:14:00,750 in that at least one state in the US 291 00:14:00,750 --> 00:14:02,115 does not require grading. 292 00:14:02,115 --> 00:14:03,753 I know there are others. 293 00:14:04,590 --> 00:14:09,420 And we also wanna just keep track of unique packaging, 294 00:14:09,420 --> 00:14:11,250 container size, if it wasn't a pint 295 00:14:11,250 --> 00:14:12,960 or a pint wasn't available, 296 00:14:12,960 --> 00:14:14,970 we also wanted to make note of that. 297 00:14:14,970 --> 00:14:16,800 So some of the methods, 298 00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:18,330 it's also important to realize 299 00:14:18,330 --> 00:14:20,700 that we were dealing with COVID lockdown. 300 00:14:20,700 --> 00:14:23,280 So the syrup was purchased 301 00:14:23,280 --> 00:14:28,280 between October 15th and November 15th, 2020. 302 00:14:28,470 --> 00:14:31,800 The university prevented us from getting right on it 303 00:14:31,800 --> 00:14:34,860 as far as access to space to do this judging, 304 00:14:34,860 --> 00:14:38,610 so they were stored for several months. 305 00:14:38,610 --> 00:14:41,608 They were two different storage areas. 306 00:14:41,608 --> 00:14:44,370 One was in a cold storage 307 00:14:44,370 --> 00:14:48,150 where it was 33 to 36 degrees Fahrenheit 308 00:14:48,150 --> 00:14:50,130 and one was at room temperature 309 00:14:50,130 --> 00:14:53,580 fluctuating between 64 and 68. 310 00:14:53,580 --> 00:14:57,452 Interestingly enough, we compared the results. 311 00:14:57,452 --> 00:14:59,640 So we had two separate groups, 312 00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:03,180 cold storage and room temperature storage. 313 00:15:03,180 --> 00:15:07,170 In those months, from October, November, 2020 314 00:15:07,170 --> 00:15:10,350 to March and April, 2021 when we did the testing, 315 00:15:10,350 --> 00:15:12,812 we saw no differences between those two groups 316 00:15:12,812 --> 00:15:15,030 in those same samples, 317 00:15:15,030 --> 00:15:18,480 which I thought was a pretty interesting result to throw 318 00:15:18,480 --> 00:15:21,540 in the middle of a method section. 319 00:15:21,540 --> 00:15:24,930 So we did end up getting time and ability 320 00:15:24,930 --> 00:15:26,970 to get in to a space 321 00:15:26,970 --> 00:15:30,030 and do the grading of the syrup 322 00:15:30,030 --> 00:15:33,630 between March and April of 2021. 323 00:15:33,630 --> 00:15:37,290 So now, again, we don't know when the syrup was produced, 324 00:15:37,290 --> 00:15:40,020 presumably it was produced the year before, 325 00:15:40,020 --> 00:15:44,730 so March, April, perhaps some February, 2020. 326 00:15:44,730 --> 00:15:47,250 So now we're talking 12 calendar months 327 00:15:47,250 --> 00:15:49,710 from whenever it was produced, 328 00:15:49,710 --> 00:15:51,300 to when it's actually being graded. 329 00:15:51,300 --> 00:15:52,920 And that's very important, 330 00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:56,640 especially in terms of syrup color, 331 00:15:56,640 --> 00:16:00,003 and we'll talk about that as we dive into the results. 332 00:16:01,890 --> 00:16:05,400 The instruments and the methods used for judging this syrup 333 00:16:05,400 --> 00:16:08,700 were no different than you would use in a sugar house 334 00:16:08,700 --> 00:16:11,460 other than we're not in the middle of production. 335 00:16:11,460 --> 00:16:12,960 So we're checking clarity 336 00:16:12,960 --> 00:16:16,320 just with a visual examination in the sample bottle. 337 00:16:16,320 --> 00:16:17,730 If there's anything floating, 338 00:16:17,730 --> 00:16:21,780 anything obvious of a defect in terms of clarity, 339 00:16:21,780 --> 00:16:24,870 then it would be noted and it would be rejected. 340 00:16:24,870 --> 00:16:27,240 The regulations, the wording is slightly different 341 00:16:27,240 --> 00:16:31,440 in different states and provinces or at the federal level. 342 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:35,130 Most of the language around clarity says something 343 00:16:35,130 --> 00:16:39,390 like syrup must be practically clean and clear. 344 00:16:39,390 --> 00:16:42,120 Now that doesn't give you a quantitative measure. 345 00:16:42,120 --> 00:16:43,170 There's no instrument, 346 00:16:43,170 --> 00:16:44,460 there's no turbidity meter 347 00:16:44,460 --> 00:16:46,080 that is used in the maple industry 348 00:16:46,080 --> 00:16:50,610 so we can't compare it to a certain standard. 349 00:16:50,610 --> 00:16:52,225 We know that in practice, 350 00:16:52,225 --> 00:16:56,670 sugar makers use a variety of filtering methods. 351 00:16:56,670 --> 00:17:00,690 Everything from a relatively simple technique 352 00:17:00,690 --> 00:17:04,313 of pouring hot syrup through a cloth cone filter 353 00:17:04,313 --> 00:17:06,120 or a flat filter, 354 00:17:06,120 --> 00:17:10,350 all the way up to a diatomaceous earth filter 355 00:17:10,350 --> 00:17:11,433 or a filter press. 356 00:17:13,530 --> 00:17:16,320 Given that the standard does not say anything specific 357 00:17:16,320 --> 00:17:19,290 about a measure of clarity, 358 00:17:19,290 --> 00:17:22,380 the interpretation in terms of that clarity 359 00:17:22,380 --> 00:17:24,360 is practically clean and clear. 360 00:17:24,360 --> 00:17:28,050 So it could in theory have a slight haze 361 00:17:28,050 --> 00:17:31,410 as long as that haze is uniform 362 00:17:31,410 --> 00:17:36,270 and doesn't represent a significant defect in clarity. 363 00:17:36,270 --> 00:17:38,910 And again, that's not very satisfying 364 00:17:38,910 --> 00:17:40,890 as far as knowing whether or not 365 00:17:40,890 --> 00:17:42,480 you're meeting the standard, 366 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:45,990 but in my understanding of that regulation, 367 00:17:45,990 --> 00:17:49,860 as long as it has uniform clarity, 368 00:17:49,860 --> 00:17:53,070 even if it might have a slight haze, that's acceptable. 369 00:17:53,070 --> 00:17:55,105 What's not acceptable is very cloudy 370 00:17:55,105 --> 00:18:00,105 or some foreign body floating in that syrup. 371 00:18:01,590 --> 00:18:04,200 And it'd be great in the Q&A to have a discussion 372 00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:06,000 if this is something people are interested in 373 00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:10,050 because the regulations are pretty thin 374 00:18:10,050 --> 00:18:11,600 when it comes to this standard. 375 00:18:12,870 --> 00:18:15,005 For density, we used both hydrometers 376 00:18:15,005 --> 00:18:16,950 that were temperature corrected 377 00:18:16,950 --> 00:18:19,050 as well as digital refractometers, 378 00:18:19,050 --> 00:18:20,700 which were calibrated. 379 00:18:20,700 --> 00:18:25,700 And those are the two standard pieces of instrumentation 380 00:18:25,710 --> 00:18:27,530 used for measuring density. 381 00:18:27,530 --> 00:18:30,750 In color, we use three different techniques. 382 00:18:30,750 --> 00:18:32,460 We use a temporary grading kit, 383 00:18:32,460 --> 00:18:35,790 which is a mix of caramel color and glycerin, 384 00:18:35,790 --> 00:18:39,150 which is mixed up every year and sold 385 00:18:39,150 --> 00:18:42,840 through the Vermont Maple Sugar Makers Association. 386 00:18:42,840 --> 00:18:45,060 It's really important that people highlight 387 00:18:45,060 --> 00:18:48,630 that the temporary grading kit is an inexpensive guide 388 00:18:48,630 --> 00:18:50,340 to grading color. 389 00:18:50,340 --> 00:18:52,350 It is not the standard. 390 00:18:52,350 --> 00:18:57,240 It is not a precise instrument, it's a guide. 391 00:18:57,240 --> 00:19:00,362 And I think there tends to be 392 00:19:00,362 --> 00:19:04,140 perhaps a little bit of overreliance on those grading kits 393 00:19:04,140 --> 00:19:08,160 because anyone who's used them knows 394 00:19:08,160 --> 00:19:10,890 the hue isn't exactly right, 395 00:19:10,890 --> 00:19:14,190 there can be a range in redness in pure maple syrup 396 00:19:14,190 --> 00:19:17,100 that just isn't reflected in these temporary standards. 397 00:19:17,100 --> 00:19:22,100 So really, be mindful when you're grading syrup, 398 00:19:22,740 --> 00:19:25,980 especially when it's right on the edge between two grades. 399 00:19:25,980 --> 00:19:29,850 And also recognize that these temporary standards 400 00:19:29,850 --> 00:19:32,580 will change color over time. 401 00:19:32,580 --> 00:19:35,280 They tend to get lighter over time. 402 00:19:35,280 --> 00:19:37,350 So it's really important to know that. 403 00:19:37,350 --> 00:19:39,510 And the best practices 404 00:19:39,510 --> 00:19:42,570 if you're gonna rely on these temporary grading kits 405 00:19:42,570 --> 00:19:44,223 is to buy a new one every year. 406 00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:47,850 We also used a Hannah meter, 407 00:19:47,850 --> 00:19:51,300 which is a single wavelength photo meter 408 00:19:51,300 --> 00:19:55,170 that relies on shooting a beam of light through a sample , 409 00:19:55,170 --> 00:19:58,290 through a very specific glass vial, 410 00:19:58,290 --> 00:20:01,140 and then the sensor reads light transmittance 411 00:20:01,140 --> 00:20:02,133 on the other end. 412 00:20:03,690 --> 00:20:06,750 The Hannah meter is an affordable instrument. 413 00:20:06,750 --> 00:20:10,263 People like it because it gives you a precise number. 414 00:20:11,340 --> 00:20:14,850 I will throw a little caution here and say 415 00:20:14,850 --> 00:20:19,410 that although it gives you a digital number, 416 00:20:19,410 --> 00:20:24,410 there are some issues with the error with these instruments. 417 00:20:25,380 --> 00:20:29,880 So there's plus or minus 4% light transmittance. 418 00:20:29,880 --> 00:20:32,370 And if you think of a whole grade, 419 00:20:32,370 --> 00:20:35,310 golden is a 25-point range. 420 00:20:35,310 --> 00:20:38,820 Each grade is a 25-point range of light transmit, 421 00:20:38,820 --> 00:20:40,470 and so plus or minus four 422 00:20:40,470 --> 00:20:44,880 is a relatively large chunk of that entire grade. 423 00:20:44,880 --> 00:20:46,560 So there's an issue there. 424 00:20:46,560 --> 00:20:49,800 And then there are things that can happen to the cuvette, 425 00:20:49,800 --> 00:20:53,250 the little glass vial, thumbprint, scratched, 426 00:20:53,250 --> 00:20:55,653 poorly filtered syrup, hot syrup, 427 00:20:57,450 --> 00:21:02,450 all kinds of things can lead to getting an erroneous number. 428 00:21:03,390 --> 00:21:05,550 So just see it for what it is. 429 00:21:05,550 --> 00:21:09,120 It's an inexpensive way of measuring light transmittance 430 00:21:09,120 --> 00:21:10,563 but it's not foolproof. 431 00:21:11,700 --> 00:21:14,708 And then in terms of color comparator, 432 00:21:14,708 --> 00:21:16,980 there's also the Lovibond kit. 433 00:21:16,980 --> 00:21:21,510 This is robust in that it's a permanent glass standard, 434 00:21:21,510 --> 00:21:23,520 which doesn't change over time. 435 00:21:23,520 --> 00:21:25,530 However, it's quite expensive. 436 00:21:25,530 --> 00:21:27,330 When you add the whole thing up, 437 00:21:27,330 --> 00:21:30,900 including the vial that you need to use, it's over $300. 438 00:21:30,900 --> 00:21:33,030 So it's very expensive. 439 00:21:33,030 --> 00:21:35,310 It's probably close to $400 now. 440 00:21:35,310 --> 00:21:38,190 And although it doesn't go old, 441 00:21:38,190 --> 00:21:40,710 it is a big investment 442 00:21:40,710 --> 00:21:45,710 and not everyone can justify that that expense. 443 00:21:46,620 --> 00:21:51,620 The last method or issue that we grade is flavor. 444 00:21:53,460 --> 00:21:57,060 So the language in a grading regulations 445 00:21:57,060 --> 00:22:00,450 talk about flavors being progressively stronger 446 00:22:00,450 --> 00:22:02,160 as you go darker in color. 447 00:22:02,160 --> 00:22:04,860 Each state and province have a slightly different wording, 448 00:22:04,860 --> 00:22:05,693 but in general, 449 00:22:05,693 --> 00:22:08,220 lighter syrup is gonna have a delicate flavor, 450 00:22:08,220 --> 00:22:10,740 darker syrup will get progressively stronger 451 00:22:10,740 --> 00:22:14,703 and defects significant off flavors are not acceptable. 452 00:22:16,950 --> 00:22:21,603 And so for all our samples, we followed the same protocol. 453 00:22:24,630 --> 00:22:26,790 And just so you know, the regulations are available. 454 00:22:26,790 --> 00:22:28,320 I guess I already mentioned that earlier, 455 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:31,443 but if you want to check them out you can review them there. 456 00:22:33,810 --> 00:22:38,810 So we produced a variety of samples 457 00:22:38,910 --> 00:22:43,910 and we had 25 producers able to provide golden, 458 00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:49,210 and 28 producers were able to sell us dark samples. 459 00:22:50,280 --> 00:22:54,480 Of those, we ended up with 116 usable samples. 460 00:22:54,480 --> 00:22:59,480 And for golden and in dark, 129 reusable. 461 00:22:59,640 --> 00:23:04,640 Just a little quick shot of of how shipping was done. 462 00:23:04,950 --> 00:23:09,570 The most common was UPS at 44%, 463 00:23:09,570 --> 00:23:13,620 next most common was the US Postal Service, 464 00:23:13,620 --> 00:23:15,180 followed by FedEx, 465 00:23:15,180 --> 00:23:19,143 and then like just a couple of percent with another method. 466 00:23:20,190 --> 00:23:21,903 Where these samples came from? 467 00:23:23,880 --> 00:23:26,040 Almost half came from Vermont. 468 00:23:26,040 --> 00:23:29,820 Next most common location, New York. 469 00:23:29,820 --> 00:23:31,260 And then you can see the breakdown. 470 00:23:31,260 --> 00:23:32,970 There was some from New Hampshire, 471 00:23:32,970 --> 00:23:37,470 Massachusetts, Maine, and so forth. 472 00:23:37,470 --> 00:23:38,553 That was for golden. 473 00:23:41,010 --> 00:23:42,330 And for the dark robust, 474 00:23:42,330 --> 00:23:45,005 again, half the samples came from Vermont 475 00:23:45,005 --> 00:23:47,940 and almost a quarter came from New York 476 00:23:47,940 --> 00:23:49,860 and the rest came from other states. 477 00:23:49,860 --> 00:23:53,500 The breakdown of state of origin was slightly different 478 00:23:53,500 --> 00:23:55,983 for darks than it was for goldens. 479 00:23:57,870 --> 00:23:59,520 Now we'll jump into the results. 480 00:23:59,520 --> 00:24:00,660 So with clarity. 481 00:24:00,660 --> 00:24:03,270 Clarity was not a huge issue. 482 00:24:03,270 --> 00:24:07,140 We had only about 4% of the samples in Golden 483 00:24:07,140 --> 00:24:09,780 were unacceptable for clarity. 484 00:24:09,780 --> 00:24:12,330 And this meant that something 485 00:24:12,330 --> 00:24:15,210 like I talked about in the standards, 486 00:24:15,210 --> 00:24:17,340 something floating in the syrup, 487 00:24:17,340 --> 00:24:21,090 unacceptable levels of cloudiness, 488 00:24:21,090 --> 00:24:22,800 something that rose to the level 489 00:24:22,800 --> 00:24:24,963 of failing to meet the standard. 490 00:24:27,390 --> 00:24:29,220 In dark, it was the same. 491 00:24:29,220 --> 00:24:32,100 About 5% failed to meet the clarity. 492 00:24:32,100 --> 00:24:34,721 And I think that's a great, that's good news, 493 00:24:34,721 --> 00:24:36,630 that it's not a huge issue. 494 00:24:36,630 --> 00:24:40,410 This is syrup that was packed in both plastic 495 00:24:40,410 --> 00:24:41,790 but also glass. 496 00:24:41,790 --> 00:24:45,540 And clarity, it shouldn't matter what type of container 497 00:24:45,540 --> 00:24:46,660 it's being packed in 498 00:24:47,760 --> 00:24:51,390 that the samples were by and large acceptable 499 00:24:51,390 --> 00:24:52,623 in terms of clarity. 500 00:24:55,980 --> 00:24:57,570 Again, color, 501 00:24:57,570 --> 00:25:01,413 these are the instruments we used, variety of cost. 502 00:25:04,320 --> 00:25:06,183 And here are the results for color. 503 00:25:07,380 --> 00:25:11,040 So when you just take the sample 504 00:25:11,040 --> 00:25:12,870 at the moment that we graded them, 505 00:25:12,870 --> 00:25:17,100 so remember this is several months, 506 00:25:17,100 --> 00:25:20,040 let's see, it was close to five months 507 00:25:20,040 --> 00:25:23,913 from when we purchased them, six months actually, 508 00:25:25,260 --> 00:25:29,880 we had zero of those samples graded out as golden, 509 00:25:29,880 --> 00:25:33,780 and that would be at 75% or lighter 510 00:25:33,780 --> 00:25:36,480 in light transmittance. 511 00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:41,340 80% of the samples were graded as amber, 20% as dark. 512 00:25:41,340 --> 00:25:44,340 And that red bar represents the mean value 513 00:25:44,340 --> 00:25:47,943 of all the light transmittance of all the samples. 514 00:25:49,170 --> 00:25:52,920 Now, I'll come back to these color results at the end 515 00:25:52,920 --> 00:25:54,780 when we're discussing the results, 516 00:25:54,780 --> 00:25:58,023 but I just want to go through them first. 517 00:26:00,270 --> 00:26:03,720 Now for dark, remember the range for dark 518 00:26:03,720 --> 00:26:08,720 is between 25% and 50% light transmittance. 519 00:26:08,790 --> 00:26:13,790 We found that 44% were actually within that range, 520 00:26:14,040 --> 00:26:17,400 and 56%, so more than half, 521 00:26:17,400 --> 00:26:20,247 were actually darker than the lower limit for color 522 00:26:20,247 --> 00:26:22,680 in dark robust syrup, 523 00:26:22,680 --> 00:26:24,753 and were graded as very dark. 524 00:26:26,760 --> 00:26:29,910 And interestingly enough, we actually had, 525 00:26:29,910 --> 00:26:32,190 at least according to the Hannah meter, 526 00:26:32,190 --> 00:26:35,850 four and a half percent had a light transmittance of zero. 527 00:26:35,850 --> 00:26:39,360 So no light penetrated that syrup at all, 528 00:26:39,360 --> 00:26:42,060 sort of the black hole of maple syrup if you will. 529 00:26:42,060 --> 00:26:46,230 But there were certainly more samples in the dark 530 00:26:46,230 --> 00:26:48,453 that met the standard than in the golden. 531 00:26:51,870 --> 00:26:54,060 Now with density, like I said, 532 00:26:54,060 --> 00:26:58,890 we used a hydrometer and we used digital refractometer. 533 00:26:58,890 --> 00:27:01,800 And just a quick note about digital refractometers. 534 00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:04,590 They are much more appropriate device to use 535 00:27:04,590 --> 00:27:06,840 at room temperature with syrup, 536 00:27:06,840 --> 00:27:10,380 even expensive digital refract refractometer like this one 537 00:27:10,380 --> 00:27:12,269 that are temperature compensated, 538 00:27:12,269 --> 00:27:15,750 they really can't tolerate hot syrup. 539 00:27:15,750 --> 00:27:18,120 Even if you let it cool after it's been hot, 540 00:27:18,120 --> 00:27:20,820 there can be issues with that tiny little bit of syrup 541 00:27:22,890 --> 00:27:26,940 becoming more dense in that sample well. 542 00:27:26,940 --> 00:27:29,520 So really digital refractometer kilometers 543 00:27:29,520 --> 00:27:30,390 have a place. 544 00:27:30,390 --> 00:27:33,450 They're good precision instruments, they can be calibrated, 545 00:27:33,450 --> 00:27:36,690 but it's not in the moment of making syrup. 546 00:27:36,690 --> 00:27:37,523 They really are... 547 00:27:37,523 --> 00:27:39,180 It's inappropriate for hot syrup. 548 00:27:39,180 --> 00:27:42,600 Hydrometer is a much more appropriate tool in the moment 549 00:27:42,600 --> 00:27:44,950 when you're producing syrup in the sugar house. 550 00:27:47,790 --> 00:27:48,690 So density. 551 00:27:48,690 --> 00:27:52,830 For golden, we found that there was a range in densities, 552 00:27:52,830 --> 00:27:57,830 everything as low as 64.9, all the way up to 69.7. 553 00:27:57,840 --> 00:27:59,343 This is degrees Brix. 554 00:28:00,600 --> 00:28:02,948 38% of the samples in golden 555 00:28:02,948 --> 00:28:07,740 were below the range for minimum density in Vermont, 556 00:28:07,740 --> 00:28:11,160 the Vermont standard of 66.9, 557 00:28:11,160 --> 00:28:15,120 but only 3.4% were below the standard, 558 00:28:15,120 --> 00:28:17,790 the USDA standard of 66 Brix, 559 00:28:17,790 --> 00:28:19,560 and that's important when we think about 560 00:28:19,560 --> 00:28:21,573 where some of these samples came from. 561 00:28:24,120 --> 00:28:26,130 And the other interesting thing to note 562 00:28:26,130 --> 00:28:30,600 is that of the samples that were below that 66 Brix, 563 00:28:30,600 --> 00:28:32,580 43% were from Vermont. 564 00:28:32,580 --> 00:28:37,230 So we can't just say it was producers 565 00:28:37,230 --> 00:28:38,550 from outside the state of Vermont 566 00:28:38,550 --> 00:28:40,590 not knowing what that minimum standard was. 567 00:28:40,590 --> 00:28:43,290 A good chunk of those were actually Vermont producers. 568 00:28:44,850 --> 00:28:47,880 Interestingly, there's very few who above the range. 569 00:28:47,880 --> 00:28:49,110 Only three, 570 00:28:49,110 --> 00:28:51,870 just under three and a half percent of the samples 571 00:28:51,870 --> 00:28:56,493 exceeded the legal limit, which is 68.9% Brix. 572 00:29:00,246 --> 00:29:05,010 Now for dark, similar, it was a fairly wide range. 573 00:29:05,010 --> 00:29:07,770 Everything is low as 63.3 Brix 574 00:29:07,770 --> 00:29:11,820 and all the way up to 71 Brix. 575 00:29:11,820 --> 00:29:12,990 Just as a reminder, 576 00:29:12,990 --> 00:29:16,006 if you have syrup that's below legal density, 577 00:29:16,006 --> 00:29:19,500 it's more at risk for mold and fermentation 578 00:29:19,500 --> 00:29:22,803 and becoming off flavored in that way. 579 00:29:23,850 --> 00:29:26,310 And the higher you get above the legal standard, 580 00:29:26,310 --> 00:29:28,590 the more likely are to have 581 00:29:28,590 --> 00:29:31,980 what we would call a super saturated solution 582 00:29:31,980 --> 00:29:35,040 that would result in hard crystals forming 583 00:29:35,040 --> 00:29:37,080 in the bottom of that container 584 00:29:37,080 --> 00:29:40,020 that would really be unusable to the consumer. 585 00:29:40,020 --> 00:29:44,280 So you wanna try to hit that two degree Brix range, 586 00:29:44,280 --> 00:29:47,463 which is the legal range for pure maple syrup. 587 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:55,110 For dark, eight and a half percent of the samples 588 00:29:55,110 --> 00:29:57,090 were below the range for Vermont, 589 00:29:57,090 --> 00:29:59,447 but only five and a half percent 590 00:29:59,447 --> 00:30:04,447 were below for the 66 Brix standard. 591 00:30:06,300 --> 00:30:10,773 And of the samples that were below the 66, 592 00:30:11,700 --> 00:30:13,500 91% were from Vermont. 593 00:30:13,500 --> 00:30:15,720 So clearly it's not producers 594 00:30:15,720 --> 00:30:18,960 from out of the state of Vermont 595 00:30:18,960 --> 00:30:21,423 not understanding the Vermont regulations. 596 00:30:22,920 --> 00:30:23,970 And similar to golden, 597 00:30:23,970 --> 00:30:26,050 we had a few percent or above the range 598 00:30:26,910 --> 00:30:30,063 that were just a little bit too dense. 599 00:30:33,540 --> 00:30:36,390 Now for flavor, we found some differences. 600 00:30:36,390 --> 00:30:41,250 We found that not unlike the results for clarity, 601 00:30:41,250 --> 00:30:44,860 only about 5% of the golden samples 602 00:30:45,960 --> 00:30:47,970 failed to meet the flavor standard. 603 00:30:47,970 --> 00:30:51,210 So 5% rejected for some sort of flavor. 604 00:30:51,210 --> 00:30:52,043 There was a mix. 605 00:30:52,043 --> 00:30:55,380 It wasn't any particular strong trend one way or the other. 606 00:30:55,380 --> 00:30:57,210 There was a little bit of buddy, 607 00:30:57,210 --> 00:31:00,153 little bit of metabolism, little bit of sour, 608 00:31:01,860 --> 00:31:04,320 so no significant trends there. 609 00:31:04,320 --> 00:31:07,103 And that's encouraging that 95% of the samples 610 00:31:07,103 --> 00:31:09,300 were acceptable. 611 00:31:09,300 --> 00:31:12,630 A higher percentage of the dark robust samples 612 00:31:12,630 --> 00:31:14,193 were rejected for flavor. 613 00:31:15,628 --> 00:31:20,245 No clear reason as to why other than darker syrup 614 00:31:20,245 --> 00:31:22,200 has more flavor in general, 615 00:31:22,200 --> 00:31:25,620 and occasionally producers may not pick up on the fact 616 00:31:25,620 --> 00:31:29,504 that some of that more flavor, 617 00:31:29,504 --> 00:31:31,860 which is in those samples, 618 00:31:31,860 --> 00:31:34,680 is actually a defect and not just strong flavor, 619 00:31:34,680 --> 00:31:38,042 it's actually something that would be identified 620 00:31:38,042 --> 00:31:41,228 as an off flavor and need to be not sold 621 00:31:41,228 --> 00:31:42,993 in a retail container. 622 00:31:46,860 --> 00:31:48,150 So like I said, 623 00:31:48,150 --> 00:31:50,910 the defects included buddy, ferment, metabolism. 624 00:31:50,910 --> 00:31:54,000 There were, I believe, a few sours in there as well, 625 00:31:54,000 --> 00:31:56,670 but no strong trends one way or the other 626 00:31:56,670 --> 00:32:01,593 as far as which flavor was most common. 627 00:32:04,770 --> 00:32:06,390 Looking at container type, 628 00:32:06,390 --> 00:32:11,340 we found that plastic was by far the most popular. 629 00:32:11,340 --> 00:32:13,140 And this is syrup that is shipped, 630 00:32:13,140 --> 00:32:15,503 so you might maybe make an argument 631 00:32:15,503 --> 00:32:17,370 that we would see more plastic 632 00:32:17,370 --> 00:32:18,490 just because we're shipping the syrup, 633 00:32:18,490 --> 00:32:21,750 we're not picking it up in a retail brick and mortar. 634 00:32:21,750 --> 00:32:24,270 Location of the plastics, 635 00:32:24,270 --> 00:32:25,980 the most common was Sugarhill, 636 00:32:25,980 --> 00:32:27,540 followed by Bacon. 637 00:32:27,540 --> 00:32:31,050 There was, in golden, 19% glass, 638 00:32:31,050 --> 00:32:34,560 whereas 15% for dark packed in glass. 639 00:32:34,560 --> 00:32:39,051 But in general, about two thirds were packed in Sugarhill 640 00:32:39,051 --> 00:32:44,051 with another 15 to almost 20% of... 641 00:32:45,060 --> 00:32:47,860 No, sorry, 10 to 17% more 642 00:32:48,750 --> 00:32:52,140 in another type of plastic container. 643 00:32:52,140 --> 00:32:56,700 So essentially three quarters of the samples we received 644 00:32:56,700 --> 00:32:58,320 were in plastic, 645 00:32:58,320 --> 00:33:00,240 and that's not necessarily something 646 00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:03,938 that the consumer is prompted. 647 00:33:03,938 --> 00:33:07,290 We didn't select for a specific container type, 648 00:33:07,290 --> 00:33:10,530 we just wanted the syrup in a certain volume 649 00:33:10,530 --> 00:33:12,123 and we get what we get. 650 00:33:16,380 --> 00:33:17,490 As far as batch codes, 651 00:33:17,490 --> 00:33:19,128 just wanted to remind folks, 652 00:33:19,128 --> 00:33:21,990 we did pay attention to badge codes. 653 00:33:21,990 --> 00:33:26,730 It was certainly an issue on some of those containers. 654 00:33:26,730 --> 00:33:29,160 Regardless of where the syrup is coming from, 655 00:33:29,160 --> 00:33:30,510 if you're selling it in to Vermont, 656 00:33:30,510 --> 00:33:34,440 you need to have that batch code. 657 00:33:34,440 --> 00:33:35,730 It doesn't have to be anything fancy, 658 00:33:35,730 --> 00:33:37,530 it doesn't have to be an automated labeler. 659 00:33:37,530 --> 00:33:40,020 It can be as simple as a indelible marker 660 00:33:40,020 --> 00:33:41,670 on the bottom of the container 661 00:33:41,670 --> 00:33:45,480 with a code that you specifically come up with. 662 00:33:45,480 --> 00:33:48,330 And it really makes good sense in a lot of different ways. 663 00:33:48,330 --> 00:33:49,590 From a business standpoint, 664 00:33:49,590 --> 00:33:51,540 you can track your inventory 665 00:33:51,540 --> 00:33:53,880 if there's a problem in the retail marketplace 666 00:33:53,880 --> 00:33:56,070 after it leaves your location, 667 00:33:56,070 --> 00:34:00,300 you can easily identify what day that syrup was produced, 668 00:34:00,300 --> 00:34:04,260 and it has implications in terms of food safety and quality. 669 00:34:04,260 --> 00:34:07,920 It's really important to maintain good records 670 00:34:07,920 --> 00:34:10,500 on when the syrup was made, 671 00:34:10,500 --> 00:34:12,510 any issues that you maybe identified, 672 00:34:12,510 --> 00:34:14,070 and then where that syrup goes 673 00:34:14,070 --> 00:34:16,323 once it leaves your operation. 674 00:34:18,480 --> 00:34:21,240 Of course if you don't have a batch code 675 00:34:21,240 --> 00:34:23,460 and can't isolate a certain batch of syrup 676 00:34:23,460 --> 00:34:28,380 and there is an issue, at least in Vermont, 677 00:34:28,380 --> 00:34:32,190 the state of Vermont can impound all your syrup 678 00:34:32,190 --> 00:34:34,200 until the issue is resolved. 679 00:34:34,200 --> 00:34:39,120 So it would help immensely in terms of your business 680 00:34:39,120 --> 00:34:42,540 if you can isolate just the batch of syrup 681 00:34:42,540 --> 00:34:43,683 that has the defect. 682 00:34:47,070 --> 00:34:50,250 When we found that, on the goldens, 683 00:34:50,250 --> 00:34:52,260 about three quarters had a batch code 684 00:34:52,260 --> 00:34:55,803 and just over a quarter did not have a batch code. 685 00:34:56,820 --> 00:34:58,500 Interestingly, it was slightly different 686 00:34:58,500 --> 00:35:01,110 for dark robust syrup. 687 00:35:01,110 --> 00:35:05,220 A little bit more were missing the batch code, 688 00:35:05,220 --> 00:35:07,623 but they were sort of in the range. 689 00:35:11,910 --> 00:35:13,920 So overall the issues we found. 690 00:35:13,920 --> 00:35:16,410 Number one issue was certainly color. 691 00:35:16,410 --> 00:35:18,570 We did see issues with density. 692 00:35:18,570 --> 00:35:21,110 And we're gonna talk a little bit about that density data 693 00:35:21,110 --> 00:35:22,230 in just a second here, 694 00:35:22,230 --> 00:35:24,460 but just wanna make sure folks recognize 695 00:35:24,460 --> 00:35:28,958 that the importance of these regulations, 696 00:35:28,958 --> 00:35:32,460 they're on paper to protect the consumer, 697 00:35:32,460 --> 00:35:34,920 their investment in a high quality product, 698 00:35:34,920 --> 00:35:37,650 it also helps the maple industry making sure 699 00:35:37,650 --> 00:35:42,650 that the name maple syrup really stands for quality. 700 00:35:43,140 --> 00:35:45,660 And the reason these regulations exist, 701 00:35:45,660 --> 00:35:47,700 and going back historically, 702 00:35:47,700 --> 00:35:50,739 is that there was a lot of fraud. 703 00:35:50,739 --> 00:35:53,820 Early 1900s, there was a lot of, 704 00:35:53,820 --> 00:35:55,050 quote, unquote, "maple syrup" 705 00:35:55,050 --> 00:36:00,050 produced that was either cut with cheap sweeteners 706 00:36:00,090 --> 00:36:02,880 like glucose or some other corn syrup, 707 00:36:02,880 --> 00:36:06,960 or had no maple whatsoever but was labeled as pure maple. 708 00:36:06,960 --> 00:36:09,690 And so the maple industry a hundred years ago 709 00:36:09,690 --> 00:36:14,550 really responded forcefully to institute these regulations 710 00:36:14,550 --> 00:36:16,983 because you are asking consumers to pay a high price 711 00:36:16,983 --> 00:36:19,350 compared to other sweeteners. 712 00:36:19,350 --> 00:36:21,090 So these regulations have a place, 713 00:36:21,090 --> 00:36:23,250 they still are relevant, 714 00:36:23,250 --> 00:36:27,573 and they really do help stand the maple industry apart. 715 00:36:30,720 --> 00:36:32,103 So in terms of color, 716 00:36:33,390 --> 00:36:36,510 Missy's question about about darkening, 717 00:36:36,510 --> 00:36:39,150 there are some research done by Tim Perkins and others 718 00:36:39,150 --> 00:36:41,310 at the Proctor Maple Research Center, 719 00:36:41,310 --> 00:36:44,130 and they found when you had syrup 720 00:36:44,130 --> 00:36:48,240 packaged in coated and uncoated plastic jugs, 721 00:36:48,240 --> 00:36:49,073 the rate of darkening 722 00:36:49,073 --> 00:36:53,100 was about two and a half percent per month in uncoated. 723 00:36:53,100 --> 00:36:54,090 Actually, I misspoke it. 724 00:36:54,090 --> 00:36:58,260 It's less than half of that rate in coated containers. 725 00:36:58,260 --> 00:37:03,260 So just less than 1% per month in coated containers. 726 00:37:03,900 --> 00:37:06,960 So when you calculate back the amount of time 727 00:37:06,960 --> 00:37:10,200 from when we did these assessments of color 728 00:37:10,200 --> 00:37:12,000 to when we received them 729 00:37:12,000 --> 00:37:14,070 and even earlier to presumably 730 00:37:14,070 --> 00:37:15,810 when they might have been canned, 731 00:37:15,810 --> 00:37:18,720 we, of course, have no idea when they were bottled up, 732 00:37:18,720 --> 00:37:21,330 but that could explain some of that darkening. 733 00:37:21,330 --> 00:37:24,390 And I did a little quick math 734 00:37:24,390 --> 00:37:26,390 and I'll show you that in just a second. 735 00:37:27,360 --> 00:37:29,757 So here's results again. 736 00:37:29,757 --> 00:37:31,740 Across the top, you have the goldens, 737 00:37:31,740 --> 00:37:34,290 across the bottom, you have the darks. 738 00:37:34,290 --> 00:37:36,933 Let's look at the color data on the left. 739 00:37:37,770 --> 00:37:40,097 So like I said, none of the samples 740 00:37:40,097 --> 00:37:44,310 when we measured them in March and April 2021 741 00:37:44,310 --> 00:37:47,460 met that minimum standard for color. 742 00:37:47,460 --> 00:37:50,340 However, if you calculated back 743 00:37:50,340 --> 00:37:54,780 using that rate of darkening from Tim Perkin's work, 744 00:37:54,780 --> 00:37:58,380 we would find that 50% actually would be in grade 745 00:37:58,380 --> 00:38:00,540 and 50% would be out a grade, 746 00:38:00,540 --> 00:38:03,389 and that's based on when we received the samples 747 00:38:03,389 --> 00:38:05,100 in October, November, 748 00:38:05,100 --> 00:38:08,670 not when some theoretical date in which they were produced, 749 00:38:08,670 --> 00:38:11,820 but actually when we took possession of those samples. 750 00:38:11,820 --> 00:38:13,230 So that's better than... 751 00:38:13,230 --> 00:38:15,120 50% is better than zero, 752 00:38:15,120 --> 00:38:17,310 but it does highlight the fact 753 00:38:17,310 --> 00:38:19,380 that some consumers will purchase it, 754 00:38:19,380 --> 00:38:21,480 and then not consume it right away. 755 00:38:21,480 --> 00:38:23,130 So it is something to think about. 756 00:38:23,130 --> 00:38:28,130 And some retailers won't revolve their stock very quickly. 757 00:38:31,470 --> 00:38:34,080 So if you're selling directly to a retailer, 758 00:38:34,080 --> 00:38:35,670 you really need to make them aware 759 00:38:35,670 --> 00:38:36,970 of the issue of darkening. 760 00:38:39,090 --> 00:38:42,180 It was even better I would say, in terms of the dark. 761 00:38:42,180 --> 00:38:43,934 So if we backcalculated 762 00:38:43,934 --> 00:38:48,390 based on that pretty linear rate of darkening 763 00:38:48,390 --> 00:38:51,453 identified by Tim Perkins in that work, 764 00:38:52,530 --> 00:38:54,809 virtually, all the very dark strong 765 00:38:54,809 --> 00:38:57,953 would be in grade and only 5% out of grade. 766 00:39:00,180 --> 00:39:02,043 As far as density, the golden, 767 00:39:02,945 --> 00:39:06,180 just over 41% were out of the range, 768 00:39:06,180 --> 00:39:10,650 but only about 6.8% are out of that international range. 769 00:39:10,650 --> 00:39:13,053 The minimum being 66 Brix. 770 00:39:15,090 --> 00:39:20,090 And similar, only 22% were out of Vermont range for dark, 771 00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:23,793 so it was more compliance there, 772 00:39:24,630 --> 00:39:29,430 and just under 10% would be below or outside the range, 773 00:39:29,430 --> 00:39:32,793 not just below, it could be above in the international. 774 00:39:36,300 --> 00:39:38,610 So best practices moving forward. 775 00:39:38,610 --> 00:39:40,740 Understand that rate of darkening, 776 00:39:40,740 --> 00:39:41,760 it's a real thing, 777 00:39:41,760 --> 00:39:44,190 it's fairly linear relationship, 778 00:39:44,190 --> 00:39:46,860 and you can count on that happening 779 00:39:46,860 --> 00:39:49,320 once you put it in that retail container. 780 00:39:49,320 --> 00:39:52,530 A lot of that darkening is happening through oxidation, 781 00:39:52,530 --> 00:39:55,380 so fill height is important. 782 00:39:55,380 --> 00:39:56,910 We know from other work 783 00:39:56,910 --> 00:40:00,000 that if you leave a huge amount of head space 784 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:00,833 in your container, 785 00:40:00,833 --> 00:40:05,780 even if it meets the stated weight or volume, I should say, 786 00:40:07,560 --> 00:40:09,570 of the syrup in that container, 787 00:40:09,570 --> 00:40:11,400 that extra oxygen and head space 788 00:40:11,400 --> 00:40:13,620 can result in some darkening. 789 00:40:13,620 --> 00:40:17,160 So one possible solution to that is to fill it right up, 790 00:40:17,160 --> 00:40:20,640 and then account for that extra weight in your pricing 791 00:40:20,640 --> 00:40:24,360 so that you're not giving away a ton of syrup 792 00:40:24,360 --> 00:40:28,268 and you are also not having that added effect 793 00:40:28,268 --> 00:40:30,444 of extra oxygen in the head space 794 00:40:30,444 --> 00:40:33,030 that can lead to darkening. 795 00:40:33,030 --> 00:40:34,920 Understand how instruments work, 796 00:40:34,920 --> 00:40:36,120 understand their accuracy, 797 00:40:36,120 --> 00:40:38,400 and also understand their limitations. 798 00:40:38,400 --> 00:40:41,250 Understand that just because an instrument 799 00:40:41,250 --> 00:40:42,780 gives you a digital reading, 800 00:40:42,780 --> 00:40:44,810 it doesn't necessarily... 801 00:40:46,140 --> 00:40:47,673 It isn't free of error. 802 00:40:48,720 --> 00:40:52,380 Understand that not everyone is highly trained 803 00:40:52,380 --> 00:40:53,970 in terms of grading. 804 00:40:53,970 --> 00:40:56,280 Flavor can be difficult. 805 00:40:56,280 --> 00:41:00,296 Make sure you have multiple people tasting samples. 806 00:41:00,296 --> 00:41:01,803 And if you have an issue, 807 00:41:02,790 --> 00:41:04,560 get a second opinion or a third opinion 808 00:41:04,560 --> 00:41:08,160 and make sure that you're not putting substandard syrup 809 00:41:08,160 --> 00:41:09,333 in the marketplace. 810 00:41:13,770 --> 00:41:15,690 And that pretty much wraps up what I have. 811 00:41:15,690 --> 00:41:19,800 I'm excited to hear the questions if Mark has some. 812 00:41:19,800 --> 00:41:23,643 I'm gonna take off the slide here. 813 00:41:24,540 --> 00:41:26,940 You did a nice job explaining the different tests 814 00:41:26,940 --> 00:41:30,510 we use for color, 815 00:41:30,510 --> 00:41:33,570 and then the more specific you showed 816 00:41:33,570 --> 00:41:36,270 were all based on the Hannah light transmittance, 817 00:41:36,270 --> 00:41:39,270 and you discussed the error factor 818 00:41:39,270 --> 00:41:41,100 that's built in that, plus or minus. 819 00:41:41,100 --> 00:41:42,270 And can you just explain, 820 00:41:42,270 --> 00:41:43,670 I believe that we sort of... 821 00:41:44,640 --> 00:41:45,900 I believe we factored that in. 822 00:41:45,900 --> 00:41:48,300 I just wanna get the explanation right to people 823 00:41:49,410 --> 00:41:51,840 how we factored in that plus or minus four. 824 00:41:51,840 --> 00:41:54,780 I think we gave syrup the benefit of the doubt, 825 00:41:54,780 --> 00:41:55,980 let's say, right? 826 00:41:55,980 --> 00:41:57,630 We didn't... 827 00:41:57,630 --> 00:41:58,710 We sort of... 828 00:41:58,710 --> 00:42:00,510 I can't explain if we went up or down with it. 829 00:42:00,510 --> 00:42:04,075 If it was within 4% of the minimum, 830 00:42:04,075 --> 00:42:06,494 then it was counted as acceptable. 831 00:42:06,494 --> 00:42:08,190 -Acceptable, great. -Yup. 832 00:42:08,190 --> 00:42:11,430 And then the other thing that I should have a slide for, 833 00:42:11,430 --> 00:42:14,056 but we saw really good agreement 834 00:42:14,056 --> 00:42:19,056 across those three grading methods for color. 835 00:42:19,980 --> 00:42:22,860 We saw good agreement between the Hannah meter, 836 00:42:22,860 --> 00:42:27,600 the temporary grade kit, and the Lovibond, 837 00:42:27,600 --> 00:42:30,510 which was encouraging because one of them is quantitative 838 00:42:30,510 --> 00:42:32,580 and the other is essentially a comparator. 839 00:42:32,580 --> 00:42:34,620 The other two are comparators. 840 00:42:34,620 --> 00:42:36,690 So we didn't see massive differences 841 00:42:36,690 --> 00:42:39,630 in what the Hannah was grading out at 842 00:42:39,630 --> 00:42:43,053 compared to the temporary kit, is what I'm saying. 843 00:42:47,835 --> 00:42:50,220 All right, everyone, I believe that I've clicked it 844 00:42:50,220 --> 00:42:51,900 so you can enable your mic. 845 00:42:51,900 --> 00:42:53,070 You just have to do that manually, 846 00:42:53,070 --> 00:42:54,970 but feel free to use the chat as well. 847 00:42:56,580 --> 00:42:57,997 So I see Nick is asking, 848 00:42:57,997 --> 00:43:01,170 "Was there a difference in grading when sliced by state?" 849 00:43:01,170 --> 00:43:02,970 So that's one of the secondary analysis 850 00:43:02,970 --> 00:43:05,940 we haven't done, but it's a great question. 851 00:43:05,940 --> 00:43:07,540 It would be interesting to note. 852 00:43:09,600 --> 00:43:13,320 Clearly, with over half the samples coming from Vermont, 853 00:43:13,320 --> 00:43:16,530 they're contributing quite a bit to the overall averages 854 00:43:16,530 --> 00:43:18,773 and they weren't perfect by any means 855 00:43:18,773 --> 00:43:20,730 in terms of meeting the standards. 856 00:43:20,730 --> 00:43:22,773 So good question. 857 00:43:25,185 --> 00:43:28,560 We'll definitely include that in in subsequent work 858 00:43:28,560 --> 00:43:32,910 or stuff that we're gonna write up as a result of this work. 859 00:43:32,910 --> 00:43:37,890 [Meg] Do you recommend canning or bottling up whole barrel 860 00:43:37,890 --> 00:43:41,620 in one go to prevent mold from developing 861 00:43:42,870 --> 00:43:45,840 sort of once there's air in the barrel? 862 00:43:45,840 --> 00:43:46,673 Oh, yeah. 863 00:43:46,673 --> 00:43:47,506 Hey, Meg. 864 00:43:50,280 --> 00:43:52,180 I think it's entirely possible 865 00:43:52,180 --> 00:43:55,980 that once you open that hot pack barrel, 866 00:43:55,980 --> 00:43:57,690 it's now no longer hot packed. 867 00:43:57,690 --> 00:44:00,690 And that we know that mold can grow 868 00:44:00,690 --> 00:44:02,970 on correct density syrup, 869 00:44:02,970 --> 00:44:07,970 and that you're just probably asking for an issue 870 00:44:08,580 --> 00:44:09,993 by leaving it partial. 871 00:44:10,878 --> 00:44:12,570 That does present a problem 872 00:44:12,570 --> 00:44:16,260 as far as handling your inventory, right? 873 00:44:16,260 --> 00:44:18,870 Maybe you don't have a whole barrel's worth 874 00:44:18,870 --> 00:44:21,450 of retail containers spoken for. 875 00:44:21,450 --> 00:44:26,160 You have to anticipate how quickly that's gonna move, 876 00:44:26,160 --> 00:44:29,160 because, especially in plastic, once you put it in plastic, 877 00:44:29,160 --> 00:44:32,400 we know it's darkening from the start. 878 00:44:32,400 --> 00:44:33,452 But, yeah, I would agree 879 00:44:33,452 --> 00:44:38,452 that leaving a partial barrel that's open is not ideal. 880 00:44:39,840 --> 00:44:42,330 If you can keep it cool, that's gonna help some, 881 00:44:42,330 --> 00:44:44,403 but it's not gonna prevent everything. 882 00:44:46,320 --> 00:44:47,160 [Nick] Yeah, I'm curious more 883 00:44:47,160 --> 00:44:51,243 about the findings on cold versus room temp storage. 884 00:44:53,100 --> 00:44:57,420 Are there general best practices on storage over that time 885 00:44:57,420 --> 00:45:00,903 and are you finding data that might challenge those myths? 886 00:45:04,148 --> 00:45:05,160 I mean, I think in general, 887 00:45:05,160 --> 00:45:08,853 it's ideal to keep surface cool as possible. 888 00:45:10,200 --> 00:45:12,720 But it was interesting that we didn't see differences 889 00:45:12,720 --> 00:45:17,720 between keeping it at just above freezing 890 00:45:18,840 --> 00:45:20,850 versus a room temperature. 891 00:45:20,850 --> 00:45:23,040 I think the issue, it's probably not linear. 892 00:45:23,040 --> 00:45:26,700 They probably start to get towards a temperature threshold, 893 00:45:26,700 --> 00:45:28,410 and then you start seeing effects. 894 00:45:28,410 --> 00:45:32,343 So maybe higher than the room temperature samples we saw. 895 00:45:33,240 --> 00:45:37,530 But as far as challenging best practice recommendations, 896 00:45:37,530 --> 00:45:39,600 it wasn't really the nature of this project 897 00:45:39,600 --> 00:45:40,770 to answer that question, 898 00:45:40,770 --> 00:45:45,770 so I wouldn't really propose a big change in practice 899 00:45:46,311 --> 00:45:48,060 as a result of this. 900 00:45:48,060 --> 00:45:50,760 I just thought it was an interesting thing to include. 901 00:45:50,760 --> 00:45:54,570 And personally, I think I would've expected to see 902 00:45:54,570 --> 00:45:57,453 a little bit more difference than we did. 903 00:45:58,470 --> 00:45:59,303 [Nick] Makes sense. 904 00:45:59,303 --> 00:46:00,136 Thanks. 905 00:46:01,650 --> 00:46:02,970 Other questions or... 906 00:46:02,970 --> 00:46:03,810 Oh, yeah, Meg. 907 00:46:03,810 --> 00:46:06,780 [Meg] What are some of the grading schools 908 00:46:06,780 --> 00:46:09,540 that sugar makers could go to? 909 00:46:09,540 --> 00:46:10,983 I think Maine has one. 910 00:46:11,857 --> 00:46:13,980 That's a great segue. 911 00:46:13,980 --> 00:46:16,430 So I've been working with... 912 00:46:17,820 --> 00:46:20,700 Just to start off, the Maple Syrup Grading School 913 00:46:20,700 --> 00:46:23,790 was a program started by Henry Marcus 914 00:46:23,790 --> 00:46:26,190 with the State of Vermont Agency of Ag, 915 00:46:26,190 --> 00:46:27,810 Kathy Hopkins with UMaine, 916 00:46:27,810 --> 00:46:31,020 and Sumner Dole with UNH Extension. 917 00:46:31,020 --> 00:46:33,123 And it's about 20 years now, they've been doing it. 918 00:46:33,123 --> 00:46:35,463 It's a two-day intensive training. 919 00:46:36,600 --> 00:46:37,620 And it's great program. 920 00:46:37,620 --> 00:46:39,270 I don't know if anyone's on the call 921 00:46:39,270 --> 00:46:40,920 who participated in that, 922 00:46:40,920 --> 00:46:42,630 but it's a really great training, 923 00:46:42,630 --> 00:46:47,630 but it does take quite a bit to hold one of those events. 924 00:46:48,180 --> 00:46:51,480 And what we found is that there's a lot of demand 925 00:46:51,480 --> 00:46:54,251 for training in syrup quality. 926 00:46:54,251 --> 00:46:56,460 And so Jason Lilley who took over 927 00:46:56,460 --> 00:46:57,870 for Kathy Hopkins at UMaine 928 00:46:57,870 --> 00:47:00,360 and I have been working with the IMSI, 929 00:47:00,360 --> 00:47:02,640 International Maple Syrup Institute, 930 00:47:02,640 --> 00:47:06,030 to continue that offering, that two-day training, 931 00:47:06,030 --> 00:47:11,030 but also try to dramatically increase access to training. 932 00:47:11,310 --> 00:47:13,530 That's not the same two-day training, 933 00:47:13,530 --> 00:47:15,840 but high quality and more accessible. 934 00:47:15,840 --> 00:47:19,950 So the idea is that there'll be a kit of samples, 935 00:47:19,950 --> 00:47:23,850 both loaners for a county organization 936 00:47:23,850 --> 00:47:27,540 or some group of individuals who wanna host a training, 937 00:47:27,540 --> 00:47:31,590 the samples will go out to those individuals, 938 00:47:31,590 --> 00:47:34,590 and the trainers, Jason and myself 939 00:47:34,590 --> 00:47:37,170 and perhaps some other content folks, 940 00:47:37,170 --> 00:47:39,390 will come in remotely. 941 00:47:39,390 --> 00:47:41,911 And so it'll have a lot of the same aspects 942 00:47:41,911 --> 00:47:44,730 of the grading school hands on, 943 00:47:44,730 --> 00:47:47,829 but it will allow us to offer this training 944 00:47:47,829 --> 00:47:52,020 much more frequently than we can with the in person. 945 00:47:52,020 --> 00:47:54,570 If you're hungry for doing the two-day training, 946 00:47:54,570 --> 00:47:58,080 you can go to La Crosse, Wisconsin in October. 947 00:47:58,080 --> 00:48:00,210 There'll be a two-day maple grading school, 948 00:48:00,210 --> 00:48:02,160 the full thing there. 949 00:48:02,160 --> 00:48:04,671 Jason has offered a one-day partial training 950 00:48:04,671 --> 00:48:06,210 in Maine as well. 951 00:48:06,210 --> 00:48:10,890 And we also offer some training at maple conferences, 952 00:48:10,890 --> 00:48:13,800 and we're gonna be doing one this December as well. 953 00:48:13,800 --> 00:48:16,860 But it won't be the full two-day training 954 00:48:16,860 --> 00:48:20,253 that folks who have attended in the past are used to. 955 00:48:21,450 --> 00:48:23,010 It's challenging, right? 956 00:48:23,010 --> 00:48:24,600 You want to have the hands on, 957 00:48:24,600 --> 00:48:26,700 you want to have the communication between individuals 958 00:48:26,700 --> 00:48:30,513 to work through some of these practices, 959 00:48:31,380 --> 00:48:33,847 but it's challenging for folks to travel 960 00:48:33,847 --> 00:48:37,440 and set these trainings up all over the place. 961 00:48:37,440 --> 00:48:39,540 So we're trying to split the difference 962 00:48:39,540 --> 00:48:41,070 and do kind of a hybrid. 963 00:48:41,070 --> 00:48:44,340 And look for more information coming out 964 00:48:44,340 --> 00:48:46,260 about when those will be available. 965 00:48:46,260 --> 00:48:49,140 We're hoping it'll be a good solution. 966 00:48:49,140 --> 00:48:51,510 I will say, just in terms of grading, 967 00:48:51,510 --> 00:48:54,060 we do have some stuff on the Maple Extension page. 968 00:48:54,060 --> 00:48:55,380 We've got four videos. 969 00:48:55,380 --> 00:48:57,593 One that goes over the basics of grading color, 970 00:48:57,593 --> 00:48:59,910 clarity, flavor, and density. 971 00:48:59,910 --> 00:49:03,300 They're about six to ten minutes long. 972 00:49:03,300 --> 00:49:04,530 You can check those out. 973 00:49:04,530 --> 00:49:06,150 They've had pretty good feedback. 974 00:49:06,150 --> 00:49:08,910 I also have some cards that, 975 00:49:08,910 --> 00:49:11,398 one for each, color, clarity, flavor and density, 976 00:49:11,398 --> 00:49:12,830 which are... 977 00:49:13,680 --> 00:49:15,090 You can't diagnose every issue, 978 00:49:15,090 --> 00:49:16,740 but on one side of the card, 979 00:49:16,740 --> 00:49:18,930 it talks about what the standards are 980 00:49:18,930 --> 00:49:21,620 for the color, clarity, flavor and density. 981 00:49:21,620 --> 00:49:22,770 On the other side of the card, 982 00:49:22,770 --> 00:49:25,080 it talks about what the most common reasons 983 00:49:25,080 --> 00:49:27,210 syrup doesn't meet that standard. 984 00:49:27,210 --> 00:49:29,393 So, it could be anything 985 00:49:29,393 --> 00:49:31,620 from not measuring the temperature of the syrup 986 00:49:31,620 --> 00:49:35,760 when you use a hydrometer or not hot-packing, 987 00:49:35,760 --> 00:49:36,783 that sort of thing. 988 00:49:37,740 --> 00:49:39,209 Even those little bits of information 989 00:49:39,209 --> 00:49:42,187 can really help remind folks 990 00:49:42,187 --> 00:49:46,530 about how to make sure their syrup meets the standard. 991 00:49:46,530 --> 00:49:48,510 And then the contest that I've been judging, 992 00:49:48,510 --> 00:49:49,877 I've been providing those cards 993 00:49:49,877 --> 00:49:53,340 to the folks who were rejected from the contest. 994 00:49:53,340 --> 00:49:55,890 We have the the card to go along with it 995 00:49:55,890 --> 00:49:58,540 to hopefully give them a little bit more information. 996 00:50:02,160 --> 00:50:04,368 And I'll also say that there's some longer format. 997 00:50:04,368 --> 00:50:06,750 Presentations talking about... 998 00:50:06,750 --> 00:50:09,311 There's at least one on maple syrup flavor, 999 00:50:09,311 --> 00:50:12,243 also on the UVM Extension Maple page. 1000 00:50:16,920 --> 00:50:18,427 More questions? 1001 00:50:18,427 --> 00:50:19,770 "Where are those cards available?" 1002 00:50:19,770 --> 00:50:22,671 How about I just go right now to the website 1003 00:50:22,671 --> 00:50:27,243 and I will add the address to the chat. 1004 00:50:33,000 --> 00:50:34,020 Any comments or questions 1005 00:50:34,020 --> 00:50:36,633 while I'm searching the page? 1006 00:50:37,500 --> 00:50:38,333 This is Mark. 1007 00:50:38,333 --> 00:50:40,500 I'll throw a question in for you Mark, 1008 00:50:40,500 --> 00:50:43,100 and for any of the participants to chime in as well. 1009 00:50:44,220 --> 00:50:46,260 I got to work with you on this project 1010 00:50:46,260 --> 00:50:48,153 and did a lot of learning myself. 1011 00:50:49,560 --> 00:50:50,790 From your experience, 1012 00:50:50,790 --> 00:50:54,540 are there producers that are actually using the Hannah meter 1013 00:50:54,540 --> 00:50:56,643 or the Lovibond kit, 1014 00:50:58,170 --> 00:50:59,580 and how would that compare to people 1015 00:50:59,580 --> 00:51:02,760 that are potentially almost exclusively using 1016 00:51:02,760 --> 00:51:03,930 the temp grading kits? 1017 00:51:03,930 --> 00:51:05,610 So that's a question for you Mark, 1018 00:51:05,610 --> 00:51:07,680 and then also to the participants. 1019 00:51:07,680 --> 00:51:08,760 Is anyone using anything 1020 00:51:08,760 --> 00:51:13,470 other than a temporary grading kit for color evaluation? 1021 00:51:13,470 --> 00:51:15,450 So we haven't really taken a survey, 1022 00:51:15,450 --> 00:51:18,870 like an actual survey that we would say 1023 00:51:18,870 --> 00:51:20,400 could feel confident in the numbers, 1024 00:51:20,400 --> 00:51:22,500 but, anecdotally I would say, 1025 00:51:22,500 --> 00:51:24,870 vast majority use a temporary kit. 1026 00:51:24,870 --> 00:51:26,280 The Hannah meter is getting popular 1027 00:51:26,280 --> 00:51:29,043 because it is only like 60, 65 bucks. 1028 00:51:29,940 --> 00:51:33,180 I would say very few people use the Lovibond, 1029 00:51:33,180 --> 00:51:35,190 but those that do like them 1030 00:51:35,190 --> 00:51:36,930 for the reasons that I already mentioned. 1031 00:51:36,930 --> 00:51:37,803 It's permanent. 1032 00:51:40,260 --> 00:51:42,480 Visually, it's easier to work with, I think. 1033 00:51:42,480 --> 00:51:46,330 I think it has a better form function. 1034 00:51:46,330 --> 00:51:49,260 I think it is a better device, 1035 00:51:49,260 --> 00:51:53,133 but it is a big outlay of cash to start. 1036 00:51:54,000 --> 00:51:54,833 No, that's great. 1037 00:51:54,833 --> 00:51:59,600 Dan and Dave both using the Hannah and the Lovibond. 1038 00:52:01,767 --> 00:52:04,170 And for me as a business person, 1039 00:52:04,170 --> 00:52:05,940 learning the standards from Mark, 1040 00:52:05,940 --> 00:52:07,500 when I see the $300 to the Lovibond 1041 00:52:07,500 --> 00:52:08,580 and he says it's really expensive, 1042 00:52:08,580 --> 00:52:10,830 I'm thinking, that's like the cheapest thing 1043 00:52:10,830 --> 00:52:11,850 in the sugar house for people 1044 00:52:11,850 --> 00:52:13,560 compared to all the other investments. 1045 00:52:13,560 --> 00:52:15,210 So it's an interesting sort of relativeness 1046 00:52:15,210 --> 00:52:18,060 of what investment level people are at. 1047 00:52:18,060 --> 00:52:18,893 But that's cool 1048 00:52:18,893 --> 00:52:20,130 that we've got a couple people on here tonight 1049 00:52:20,130 --> 00:52:20,963 with a small group 1050 00:52:20,963 --> 00:52:24,060 that are using the alternative color tests. 1051 00:52:24,060 --> 00:52:26,360 Alternative is not the right word, additional. 1052 00:52:27,600 --> 00:52:30,690 So I just put in the link to the grade cards directly, 1053 00:52:30,690 --> 00:52:33,960 but also the page that has the grading videos. 1054 00:52:33,960 --> 00:52:35,490 And you should know that the grade cards 1055 00:52:35,490 --> 00:52:37,170 have a QR code you can scan. 1056 00:52:37,170 --> 00:52:40,323 It goes right to those same grading videos. 1057 00:52:42,420 --> 00:52:43,253 Interesting. 1058 00:52:43,253 --> 00:52:44,437 Meg's got a comment there. 1059 00:52:44,437 --> 00:52:46,020 "We've used the Hannah and the Lovibond, 1060 00:52:46,020 --> 00:52:47,730 but I had some issues with the grades 1061 00:52:47,730 --> 00:52:49,617 being completely different." 1062 00:52:51,750 --> 00:52:53,190 -Yeah. -Meg, any clarification? 1063 00:52:53,190 --> 00:52:55,950 Is that between the Hannah and the Lovibond 1064 00:52:55,950 --> 00:52:58,893 or between one of those and the temp kit? 1065 00:53:00,450 --> 00:53:02,220 [Meg] We haven't used the temp kit, 1066 00:53:02,220 --> 00:53:04,323 although I'm gonna get one this year. 1067 00:53:05,640 --> 00:53:08,880 We've been using the Lovibond forever 1068 00:53:08,880 --> 00:53:11,343 and I just got a Hannah, 1069 00:53:13,590 --> 00:53:14,940 I don't know, just because I thought 1070 00:53:14,940 --> 00:53:16,830 it would be more accurate. 1071 00:53:16,830 --> 00:53:21,830 And then they were both like completely off at whole grade. 1072 00:53:22,170 --> 00:53:27,030 And then we ended up grading with the Lovibond, 1073 00:53:27,030 --> 00:53:30,180 but we sent some syrup off to a contest somewhere. 1074 00:53:30,180 --> 00:53:34,382 And I think some of it was graded by color, 1075 00:53:34,382 --> 00:53:36,870 and it was rejected by color. 1076 00:53:36,870 --> 00:53:39,963 So we were assuming our Lovibond was off. 1077 00:53:42,210 --> 00:53:47,210 And I think we got it since the grades were changed, 1078 00:53:47,490 --> 00:53:51,240 so it should be correct, from what I'm hearing, 1079 00:53:51,240 --> 00:53:55,620 but maybe we need another color wheel. 1080 00:53:55,620 --> 00:53:56,660 Yeah, I mean, you would know... 1081 00:53:56,660 --> 00:53:59,508 If it says golden, amber and dark on the wheel, 1082 00:53:59,508 --> 00:54:02,040 then that would be the most up to date standards. 1083 00:54:02,040 --> 00:54:04,920 When they were first coming out with those wheels, 1084 00:54:04,920 --> 00:54:09,450 there was an issue I think with the golden like glass chip, 1085 00:54:09,450 --> 00:54:10,830 but that was so early. 1086 00:54:10,830 --> 00:54:12,964 I don't even know if they made it in the marketplace. 1087 00:54:12,964 --> 00:54:16,143 I know they sent some to us at Proctor to check. 1088 00:54:18,690 --> 00:54:19,523 Boy. 1089 00:54:21,660 --> 00:54:23,450 Again, there's so many things... 1090 00:54:24,420 --> 00:54:26,550 The Hannah meter gives you a precise reading, right? 1091 00:54:26,550 --> 00:54:30,507 But air bubbles and, you know, it can be... 1092 00:54:30,507 --> 00:54:34,650 There are several things that can throw that number off. 1093 00:54:34,650 --> 00:54:36,480 I guess if I had to go with one, 1094 00:54:36,480 --> 00:54:38,070 I would probably go with a Lovibond 1095 00:54:38,070 --> 00:54:40,803 because it does represent the minimum of each grade. 1096 00:54:42,540 --> 00:54:45,207 But it's interesting that you had used the Lovibond 1097 00:54:45,207 --> 00:54:46,713 and it got rejected. 1098 00:54:48,870 --> 00:54:50,550 -Did you get a number back? -When we are testing... 1099 00:54:50,550 --> 00:54:51,383 Oh, yeah. 1100 00:54:51,383 --> 00:54:52,730 -Go ahead. -No we didn't. 1101 00:54:52,730 --> 00:54:53,563 We didn't. 1102 00:54:55,080 --> 00:54:56,913 When you're testing with the Hannah, 1103 00:54:57,750 --> 00:55:01,710 is it better for it to be hot syrup or cold? 1104 00:55:01,710 --> 00:55:03,240 No, it should be room temperature. 1105 00:55:03,240 --> 00:55:04,320 -Room temp. -Yeah. 1106 00:55:04,320 --> 00:55:05,570 Hot syrup is... 1107 00:55:06,720 --> 00:55:09,690 And I don't have the manual with me, 1108 00:55:09,690 --> 00:55:14,690 but I'm pretty sure they suggest a temperature range to use. 1109 00:55:16,007 --> 00:55:16,840 Okay. 1110 00:55:16,840 --> 00:55:18,910 The manual is available online, 1111 00:55:18,910 --> 00:55:23,490 but, in general, things are happening, 1112 00:55:23,490 --> 00:55:26,640 things change so quickly with hot syrup. 1113 00:55:26,640 --> 00:55:31,560 I mean, it's not great to do hot syrup in a grade kit, 1114 00:55:31,560 --> 00:55:33,120 even a temporary kit, really, 1115 00:55:33,120 --> 00:55:36,958 just because it can be the density, 1116 00:55:36,958 --> 00:55:39,540 you have some expansion. 1117 00:55:39,540 --> 00:55:43,050 It's not huge, but it's different than when it cools. 1118 00:55:43,050 --> 00:55:48,050 So, in general, grading cooler syrup is better. 1119 00:55:48,090 --> 00:55:50,193 Not always possible, I recognize. 1120 00:55:54,120 --> 00:55:55,837 So I see Dan has a question. 1121 00:55:55,837 --> 00:56:00,000 "Any assistance advice with packing larger volume batches 1122 00:56:00,000 --> 00:56:01,533 in relation to density? 1123 00:56:02,520 --> 00:56:04,590 I haven't been as happy with the digital read 1124 00:56:04,590 --> 00:56:06,177 for syrup density." 1125 00:56:08,430 --> 00:56:10,350 Dan, is it possible for you to unmute 1126 00:56:10,350 --> 00:56:13,560 and clarify your question a little bit? 1127 00:56:13,560 --> 00:56:15,825 Are you seeing issues from start to finish of the batch? 1128 00:56:15,825 --> 00:56:18,120 Across the batch. 1129 00:56:18,120 --> 00:56:21,540 So are you using gas fired, 1130 00:56:21,540 --> 00:56:23,130 a fairly simple canning unit 1131 00:56:23,130 --> 00:56:26,401 or do you have a water jacketed canner. 1132 00:56:26,401 --> 00:56:30,213 It seems like that might be part of it, or could be. 1133 00:56:31,927 --> 00:56:34,173 "Steam pan through a press 1134 00:56:34,173 --> 00:56:37,230 and then water jacketed canner." 1135 00:56:37,230 --> 00:56:42,230 And so you're seeing big ranges in density 1136 00:56:42,270 --> 00:56:46,440 from when you start a batch to when you finish, I guess. 1137 00:56:46,440 --> 00:56:47,273 Is that... 1138 00:56:47,273 --> 00:56:48,513 Just clarifying. 1139 00:56:49,897 --> 00:56:52,980 "Almost one and a half Brix across." 1140 00:56:52,980 --> 00:56:54,810 Yeah, that's... 1141 00:56:54,810 --> 00:56:56,370 Considering that's almost all the way 1142 00:56:56,370 --> 00:56:58,290 through the range of density. 1143 00:56:58,290 --> 00:56:59,370 That's tough. 1144 00:56:59,370 --> 00:57:00,810 Are you filling one at a time 1145 00:57:00,810 --> 00:57:04,033 or do you have multiple fillers going at once 1146 00:57:06,930 --> 00:57:10,020 that you're just trying to shorten the time it takes 1147 00:57:10,020 --> 00:57:11,763 to get through a huge batch. 1148 00:57:11,763 --> 00:57:14,370 That's a big batch of syrup at a time. 1149 00:57:20,640 --> 00:57:22,660 Well, I don't have a ton of experience, Dan, 1150 00:57:22,660 --> 00:57:26,610 so I'm happy to ask around and try to get you an answer, 1151 00:57:26,610 --> 00:57:28,470 but I don't have anything. 1152 00:57:28,470 --> 00:57:31,020 It sounds like you're doing a lot of things 1153 00:57:31,020 --> 00:57:35,070 that I would expect to be ideal. 1154 00:57:35,070 --> 00:57:39,350 And you're taking it to 185 Fahrenheit, 1155 00:57:40,680 --> 00:57:45,210 not some extremely higher temperature. 1156 00:57:45,210 --> 00:57:46,140 All right, last question. 1157 00:57:46,140 --> 00:57:47,670 This is kind of funny. 1158 00:57:47,670 --> 00:57:49,770 Talking one and having the text come back. 1159 00:57:51,120 --> 00:57:54,780 But how long does it take you 1160 00:57:54,780 --> 00:57:59,780 to get through that 160 to 300 gallons? 1161 00:58:00,930 --> 00:58:01,763 Obviously it depends 1162 00:58:01,763 --> 00:58:03,600 on the type of container you're filling and stuff, 1163 00:58:03,600 --> 00:58:07,683 but how much time do you budget for that? 1164 00:58:10,680 --> 00:58:11,513 Few hours? 1165 00:58:11,513 --> 00:58:13,710 Okay, well, we do have your contact information 1166 00:58:13,710 --> 00:58:14,610 through registration, 1167 00:58:14,610 --> 00:58:17,130 so let me try to track down some answers 1168 00:58:17,130 --> 00:58:20,880 from people who have more experience and get back to you. 1169 00:58:20,880 --> 00:58:22,053 Any other questions? 1170 00:58:30,180 --> 00:58:31,440 Well, it's a lot to digest. 1171 00:58:31,440 --> 00:58:34,240 Appreciate everyone's attention and time and showing up. 1172 00:58:35,160 --> 00:58:36,840 I know we're coming out of this thing 1173 00:58:36,840 --> 00:58:38,370 and people are tired of webinars, 1174 00:58:38,370 --> 00:58:42,720 but we really appreciate your registering and showing up. 1175 00:58:42,720 --> 00:58:43,890 And there are more, 1176 00:58:43,890 --> 00:58:47,159 so please don't forget to sign up for the next one. 1177 00:58:47,159 --> 00:58:50,370 It's gonna be about SAP business. 1178 00:58:50,370 --> 00:58:54,300 And check out all the past webinars 1179 00:58:54,300 --> 00:58:56,190 that are available on maplemanager.org. 1180 00:58:56,190 --> 00:58:59,130 We got a ton of content there as well. 1181 00:58:59,130 --> 00:59:01,800 And, Mark, do you have anything to add 1182 00:59:01,800 --> 00:59:03,474 before we say goodnight? 1183 00:59:03,474 --> 00:59:05,250 No, thanks for the presentation, Mark. 1184 00:59:05,250 --> 00:59:06,720 It's great to have your knowledge. 1185 00:59:06,720 --> 00:59:08,010 Thanks for the questions, everyone. 1186 00:59:08,010 --> 00:59:10,713 And, yeah, have a great evening. 1187 00:59:12,060 --> 00:59:12,943 -All right. -Thanks, Mark. 1188 00:59:12,943 --> 00:59:15,030 -I really appreciate it. -Take care everyone. 1189 00:59:15,030 --> 00:59:15,863 Yup.